#NIFTY in Regression Channel.
A rectangular consolidation around the central Line of Best Fit, with no such reversal characteristics on display yet.
For it to revisit the upper band, odds would increase only on a break above ~17450.
Else, it's a slippery slope.
More from Piyush Chaudhry
New All Time High.
#HINDUNILVR
EW
Long Term Chart of the Month. #HINDUNILVR
— Piyush Chaudhry (@piyushchaudhry) December 9, 2020
Sometime in the next decade I see a fair possibility of stock reaching 7000 odd.
Invalidation below Blue Trendline. #ElliottWave pic.twitter.com/uxQrzt1mbj
as per relative strength
One question that I often get is which of the two: #HINDUNILVR or #ITC would be a better Investment bet. While their individual charts are clear themselves, another approach is ratio chart. IMHO Lever should outperform ITC for several years going forward.https://t.co/3AFqm6FJ1Q pic.twitter.com/rLuIm8xyVw
— Piyush Chaudhry (@piyushchaudhry) December 30, 2020
More from Nifty
So now that Nifty has undergone ABC correction in the expected manner, what to expect next?
I think we have started larger degree wave 3, once 16800 was crossed.
16800 is the reference level now. We will get more sense by end of next week/ month. https://t.co/KsziuUpZxU
I am no expert in Wave Theory, but can this be a possible path over next few weeks/months?
— Mayank Narula (@Mayank_Narula1) December 6, 2021
Views requested. @idineshptl @indiacharts @nishkumar1977 pic.twitter.com/u3DjEeqoqB
#NIFTY
If 17445 is taken out, then may be we are heading to fresh new all time on Nifty.
Things may pan out way faster than expected.
#NIFTY
Zoomed in cross-section of the chart above.
Wave 3 of 1 should have started today, which can take Nifty to fresh all time highs.
#NIFTY
So now Nifty is moving more clearly on the expected path, what's next?
Nifty has started longer term wave 3 advancement, pending final confirmation of HH by crossing 17800.
In Wave 1 of 3, can expect a move to 20k+.
In terms of longer term wave structure:
Wave 1: 7500 to 18600
Wave 3: 15700 to 35000+
And this can pan out over next 2 years or so.
Since wave 2 was a shallow correction, wave 4 can potentially be a deeper correction.
Low made 17129.55
Objective 0.382% (17181) #done.
If nifty not sustain above today and high and gap remain gap than more downside open till Fibonacci retracement
0.50%(16893) and 0.618%(16604
#Probability
#NiFTY_50(17475)
— Waves_Perception(Dinesh Patel) \u092e\u0948\u0902Schedule Tribe) (@idineshptl) April 17, 2022
Daily chart and monthly chart.
Dail chart show Fibonacci retracement level 1st 0.236% done.
Next objetive is to test 2nd 0.382%17181 during the entire week and close near to it.#MACD#RSI pic.twitter.com/Bt9bJuHDFh
You May Also Like
Legacy site *downloads* ~630 KB CSS per theme and writing direction.
6,769 rules
9,252 selectors
16.7k declarations
3,370 unique declarations
44 media queries
36 unique colors
50 unique background colors
46 unique font sizes
39 unique z-indices
https://t.co/qyl4Bt1i5x
PWA *incrementally generates* ~30 KB CSS that handles all themes and writing directions.
735 rules
740 selectors
757 declarations
730 unique declarations
0 media queries
11 unique colors
32 unique background colors
15 unique font sizes
7 unique z-indices
https://t.co/w7oNG5KUkJ
The legacy site's CSS is what happens when hundreds of people directly write CSS over many years. Specificity wars, redundancy, a house of cards that can't be fixed. The result is extremely inefficient and error-prone styling that punishes users and developers.
The PWA's CSS is generated on-demand by a JS framework that manages styles and outputs "atomic CSS". The framework can enforce strict constraints and perform optimisations, which is why the CSS is so much smaller and safer. Style conflicts and unbounded CSS growth are avoided.
As someone\u2019s who\u2019s read the book, this review strikes me as tremendously unfair. It mostly faults Adler for not writing the book the reviewer wishes he had! https://t.co/pqpt5Ziivj
— Teresa M. Bejan (@tmbejan) January 12, 2021
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x