#Nifty
1. 17400 to 18115 (Expected)
2. 18115 to 16825 (Actual)
Its playing out. Need to form bottom to call higher low n start moving up to confirm it. Lets get the reversal sign from 16620-16900 zone which is 200dema,50-61.8% fibo
I see this as higher bottom formation process
More from Shivaji Vitthalrao🇮🇳
What was on the charts ?
Once 135 was crossed there was no looking back @moneyworks4u_fa
Lots of hints given 😊🙏
#NTPC -- On the verge of 13yr breakout above 140-144 can do 170-180 pic.twitter.com/eDBGHVqlYz
— Shivaji Vitthalrao\U0001f1ee\U0001f1f3 (@shivaji_1983) March 24, 2022
More from Nifty
So now that Nifty has undergone ABC correction in the expected manner, what to expect next?
I think we have started larger degree wave 3, once 16800 was crossed.
16800 is the reference level now. We will get more sense by end of next week/ month. https://t.co/KsziuUpZxU
I am no expert in Wave Theory, but can this be a possible path over next few weeks/months?
— Mayank Narula (@Mayank_Narula1) December 6, 2021
Views requested. @idineshptl @indiacharts @nishkumar1977 pic.twitter.com/u3DjEeqoqB
#NIFTY
If 17445 is taken out, then may be we are heading to fresh new all time on Nifty.
Things may pan out way faster than expected.
#NIFTY
Zoomed in cross-section of the chart above.
Wave 3 of 1 should have started today, which can take Nifty to fresh all time highs.
#NIFTY
So now Nifty is moving more clearly on the expected path, what's next?
Nifty has started longer term wave 3 advancement, pending final confirmation of HH by crossing 17800.
In Wave 1 of 3, can expect a move to 20k+.
In terms of longer term wave structure:
Wave 1: 7500 to 18600
Wave 3: 15700 to 35000+
And this can pan out over next 2 years or so.
Since wave 2 was a shallow correction, wave 4 can potentially be a deeper correction.
You May Also Like
RT-PCR corona (test) scam
Symptomatic people are tested for one and only one respiratory virus. This means that other acute respiratory infections are reclassified as
4/10
— Dr. Thomas Binder, MD (@Thomas_Binder) October 22, 2020
...indication, first of all that testing for a (single) respiratory virus is done outside of surveillance systems or need for specific therapy, but even so the lack of consideration of Ct, symptoms and clinical findings when interpreting its result. https://t.co/gHH6kwRdZG
2/12
It is tested exquisitely with a hypersensitive non-specific RT-PCR test / Ct >35 (>30 is nonsense, >35 is madness), without considering Ct and clinical context. This means that more acute respiratory infections are reclassified as
6/10
— Dr. Thomas Binder, MD (@Thomas_Binder) October 22, 2020
The neither validated nor standardised hypersensitive RT-PCR test / Ct 35-45 for SARS-CoV-2 is abused to mislabel (also) other diseases, especially influenza, as COVID-19.https://t.co/AkFIfTCTkS
3/12
The Drosten RT-PCR test is fabricated in a way that each country and laboratory perform it differently at too high Ct and that the high rate of false positives increases massively due to cross-reaction with other (corona) viruses in the "flu
External peer review of the RTPCR test to detect SARS-CoV-2 reveals 10 major scientific flaws at the molecular and methodological level: consequences for false positive results.https://t.co/mbNY8bdw1p pic.twitter.com/OQBD4grMth
— Dr. Thomas Binder, MD (@Thomas_Binder) November 29, 2020
4/12
Even asymptomatic, previously called healthy, people are tested (en masse) in this way, although there is no epidemiologically relevant asymptomatic transmission. This means that even healthy people are declared as COVID
Thread web\u2b06\ufe0f\u2b07\ufe0f
— Dr. Thomas Binder, MD (@Thomas_Binder) December 16, 2020
The fabrication of the "asymptomatic (super) spreader" is the coronation of the total nons(ci)ense in the belief system of #CoronasWitnesses.
Asymptomatic transmission 0.7%; 95% CI 0%-4.9% - could well be 0%!https://t.co/VeZTzxXfvT
5/12
Deaths within 28 days after a positive RT-PCR test from whatever cause are designated as deaths WITH COVID. This means that other causes of death are reclassified as
8/8
— Dr. Thomas Binder, MD (@Thomas_Binder) March 24, 2020
By the way, who the f*** created this obviously (almost) worldwide definition of #CoronaDeath?
This is not only medical malpractice, this is utterly insane!https://t.co/FFsTx4L2mw