I saw this discussion going on yesterday
Wasn't able to comment for various reasons
There is a lot to unpack here so let's take a step back & look at this objectively & subjectively.

So let's look at this subjectively. This is where I feel the core of most of the disagreements yesterday were
Should the doctor in question have used more appropriate language in her history taking (questioning)?
Yes I feel so. It could have been worded better definitely. We can always improve we can always learn
Sex & marriage are not mutually dependent
This is where things get dicey
I know nothing of the people involved
I don't know the background of the people involved
Could both the doctor & the patient be a victim of their upbringing/cultural differences?
We don't know this. Easy to judge both from our own bias.
Can we hold it against the doctor for being like that? Depends on our own bias & where we stand in the cultural spectrum.
Since I've worked abroad my approach
would have been different. Just after coming back to India had a patient who I asked "are you sexually active"
The immediate reply with righteous indignation was "how dare you I'm not married!"
🤷♂️
This is a delicate issue. And it definitely could have been handled better by a person who claims to be a journalist QTing the original post.
Off the top of my head the choice of contraception suggested might be different if it was a fixed partner vs multiple partners.
Contraception is not only for preventing pregnancy but also to prevent STDs
So if the doctor was thinking like that then what is wrong with that line of questioning?