How to write a cover letter?

Here is a general structure you can use.

🧵👇

◻️ 1. Opening

- Dear Sir / Madam
- Dear *company name*
◻️ 2. Reason for writing

- I am writing to express my interest in the position of...
- I wish to apply for the position of...
- I am writing in response to your advertisement for...
- I am writing to enquire as to whether there are any vacancies...
◻️ 3. Introducing yourself

- I am currently working on... / I am currently studying...
- At present, I am working for... where I am responsible for...
- I have been working in my current position for the past(time)
◻️ 4. Talking about your education/experience

- I graduated from University X with a degree in...
- The nature of my studies has prepared me well for a position such as...
- As you can see from my CV, I have worked for... and gained experience in... working on...
◻️ 5. Why you are the best for this position

- I feel, I am suitable for this role as I have a great deal of experience in...
- I consider myself to be friendly, efficient, and enthusiastic...
- I believe I would be the ideal, candidate based on the fact that I...
◻️ 6. Closing comments

- Thank you for taking the time to consider my application
- I am available for contact and/or interview at any time
- If you wish to contact me, you can do so on...
- Should you require more information, do not hesitate to contact me
◻️ 7. Signing off

- I look forward to hearing from you
- Yours sincerely...
- Best regards...
Anything else to add?

More from Marketing

25 Marketing Threads That Will Teach You More Than Any Marketing Class 🧵

1. 10 Marketing Lessons From Steve Jobs That Every Marketer Must Know


2. The Ad Campaign That Changed Advertising Forever


3. How Absolut Vodka Went From 2% Market Share to 50% With One Ad Campaign


4. Why Jeff Bezos named his online bookstore,

You May Also Like

This is a pretty valiant attempt to defend the "Feminist Glaciology" article, which says conventional wisdom is wrong, and this is a solid piece of scholarship. I'll beg to differ, because I think Jeffery, here, is confusing scholarship with "saying things that seem right".


The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.


Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)


There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.


At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?
"I really want to break into Product Management"

make products.

"If only someone would tell me how I can get a startup to notice me."

Make Products.

"I guess it's impossible and I'll never break into the industry."

MAKE PRODUCTS.

Courtesy of @edbrisson's wonderful thread on breaking into comics –
https://t.co/TgNblNSCBj – here is why the same applies to Product Management, too.


There is no better way of learning the craft of product, or proving your potential to employers, than just doing it.

You do not need anybody's permission. We don't have diplomas, nor doctorates. We can barely agree on a single standard of what a Product Manager is supposed to do.

But – there is at least one blindingly obvious industry consensus – a Product Manager makes Products.

And they don't need to be kept at the exact right temperature, given endless resource, or carefully protected in order to do this.

They find their own way.
"I lied about my basic beliefs in order to keep a prestigious job. Now that it will be zero-cost to me, I have a few things to say."


We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.

Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)

It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.

Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".