ZUCKERBERG'S ELECTION🚨
1/ Funded by $350 Million from Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg, activist organizations created a two-tiered election system that treated voters differently depending on whether they lived in Democrat or Republican strongholds.🔻
In Pennsylvania, $13,063,828 for Clinton and $692,742 for Trump.
CTCL hidden COVID-19 grant agenda was to increase the votes for Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden.🔻
The “Wisconsin Safe Election Plan” was not authored by the state. Effectively, CTCL managed the election in these five cities.
•Promote no voter ID "indefinitely confined"
•Drop Boxes breaching chain of custody
•Consolidating counting centers🔻
Election officials hired & trained by CTCL failed to provide meaningful bi-partisan observation. They gave direct access of state voter files to "leftist" groups like 'Rock The Vote'. Thousands of ballots were cured without oversight from bipartisan observers.🔻
CTCL paid election judges & election officials in Philadelphia mandated polling places & drop boxes.
In Democrat Delaware County, there was 1 drop box every 4 square miles.
In 59 Republican counties, there was 1 drop box every 1,100 square miles.🔻
Fulton County allowed private access directly to government voter registration files & access to early voting opportunities.
CTCL-funded counties had drop boxes every 14 square miles while unfunded counties had drop boxes every 294 square miles.🔻
Zuckerberg-money initiated the use of drop boxes for ballot collection, significantly breaching the chain of custody & failing to maintain proper logs to ensure all properly cast ballots were counted & all improperly cast ballots were not counted.🔻
Zuckerberg's charity, CTCL, paid for election judges, purchased the drop boxes, ordered the consolidation of the counting facilities, paid the election officials that boarded up the windows, & dictated the policies that undermined state law.🔻
Mahalo to @PhillDKline for fighting for election integrity as a private citizen and compiling this report on how private funds enabled election fraud in several key states.🔻
https://t.co/ekl5es8AnO
https://t.co/uGA5yeCEwB
CTCL\U0001f6a8
— Kanekoa (@KanekoaTheGreat) December 5, 2020
Zuckerberg donated $400M to help with local elections. In Philadelphia, CTCL dictated the polling places, paid the election officials, brought in drop boxes, consolidated the counting centers. In short, private partisan funds led to a violation of equal protection laws.\U0001f53b pic.twitter.com/8j7TxPldZ2
More from Kanekoa
There is overwhelming evidence of election fraud in all contested states. Therefore it is the duty of the Executive, Legislative, & Judicial branches to throw out the fraudulent votes & to honor their oath to protect & defend the Constitution of the USA.🇺🇸🦅
https://t.co/XP9LQuEPtY
*The Evidence Collection*
— Kanekoa (@KanekoaTheGreat) December 29, 2020
There is overwhelming evidence of election fraud. Therefore it is the duty of the Executive, Legislative, & Judicial branches to throw out the fraudulent votes & to honor their oath to protect & defend the Constitution of the USA.\U0001f1fa\U0001f1f8\U0001f985
A list below.\U0001f53b pic.twitter.com/x57NgPVhhd
https://t.co/LMeZ6uOfzW
Thread of my threads. pic.twitter.com/KCQ1AOoIn3
— Kanekoa (@KanekoaTheGreat) November 23, 2020
You May Also Like
It's all in French, but if you're up for it you can read:
• Their blog post (lacks the most interesting details): https://t.co/PHkDcOT1hy
• Their high-level legal decision: https://t.co/hwpiEvjodt
• The full notification: https://t.co/QQB7rfynha
I've read it so you needn't!
Vectaury was collecting geolocation data in order to create profiles (eg. people who often go to this or that type of shop) so as to power ad targeting. They operate through embedded SDKs and ad bidding, making them invisible to users.
The @CNIL notes that profiling based off of geolocation presents particular risks since it reveals people's movements and habits. As risky, the processing requires consent — this will be the heart of their assessment.
Interesting point: they justify the decision in part because of how many people COULD be targeted in this way (rather than how many have — though they note that too). Because it's on a phone, and many have phones, it is considered large-scale processing no matter what.
Always. No, your company is not an exception.
A tactic I don’t appreciate at all because of how unfairly it penalizes low-leverage, junior employees, and those loyal enough not to question it, but that’s negotiation for you after all. Weaponized information asymmetry.
Listen to Aditya
"we don't negotiate salaries" really means "we'd prefer to negotiate massive signing bonuses and equity grants, but we'll negotiate salary if you REALLY insist" https://t.co/80k7nWAMoK
— Aditya Mukerjee, the Otterrific \U0001f3f3\ufe0f\u200d\U0001f308 (@chimeracoder) December 4, 2018
And by the way, you should never be worried that an offer would be withdrawn if you politely negotiate.
I have seen this happen *extremely* rarely, mostly to women, and anyway is a giant red flag. It suggests you probably didn’t want to work there.
You wish there was no negotiating so it would all be more fair? I feel you, but it’s not happening.
Instead, negotiate hard, use your privilege, and then go and share numbers with your underrepresented and underpaid colleagues. […]