Imposter Syndrome 101

What if, I’m not good enough? What if, I try it and fail? What if, I speak up and say something dumb? Surely, I’m out of my league here.

Sound familiar? That annoying inner-voice is more common than you may think.

Here’s Imposter Syndrome 101...

👇🏽👇🏽👇🏽

1/ First, what is it?

Imposter syndrome is a psychological phenomenon in which a person doubts their skills, talents, or accomplishments and has a persistent fear of being exposed as a fraud.

Essentially, you attribute your success to dumb luck and/or believe it is undeserved.
2/ A pair of psychologists, Suzanna Imes & Pauline Clance, first noted this phenomenon in the 1970’s while observing 178 high-achieving women.

Inexplicably, the women had convinced themselves they were not that smart, instead they had simply fooled anyone who thought otherwise.
3/ Initially, Imes & Clance believed this ‘imposter’ feeling was exclusive to women.

They theorized that since women were (wrongly) stereotyped as less capable at the time, these high-achievers rationalized their accolades by concluding it was all fake or perceived.
4/ In the time since researchers have established imposter syndrome can affect us all.

And, as many as 7 out of 10 of us have our own internal struggles with this self-defeating belief system.

As it turns out, high performers by their very nature are prone to imposter feelings.
5/ Even the guy who gave us e=mc^2, it seems, was at odds with this conflict of reality.

As Einstein confided to Queen Elisabeth, “the exaggerated esteem in which my life work is held makes me very ill at ease. I feel compelled to think of myself as an involuntary swindler.”
6/ But that’s just Einstein being, well, Einstein - right?!

Perhaps, but as @tomhanks put it, “no matter what we’ve done, there comes a point where you think, ‘How did I get here? When are they going to discover that I am, in fact, a fraud and take everything away from me?”
7/ As you might imagine, many who experience impostorism keep it to themselves—falsely believing they are alone in these feelings.

The result; anxiety, depression, low self-confidence, and rumination with the inability to meet ever-increasing standards of achievement.
8/ While a little self-doubt, humility, and a pesky internal voice that is never satisfied is likely necessary for high performers; too much can be debilitating.

Let’s look at some examples of how to spot impostorism in ourselves (and others), & what we can do to overcome it...
9/ The Perfectionist.

This person tends to micromanage and fails to delegate effectively due to the impossibly high standard of achieving perfection. As a result, less gets done.

🗝 Remember, “done is better than perfect.” Whatever it is you want to accomplish, just start!
10/ The Superhero.

This person tends to be a workaholic, largely as a cover for their insecurities. Craving external validation, they also take constructive criticism personal.

🗝 Practice breath as an anchor to the present. Power poses & positive self-talk to build confidence.
11/ The Natural Genius.

This person tends to be fixed-minded, judging their competence (and thus worth) by the speed & ease of their work.

🗝 Language —> “yet” can give a powerful framework to embrace the process of adding a new skill.

e.g. “I’m not good at that, ‘yet’.”
12/ The Soloist.

This person tends to take on everything by themselves. Asking for help, in their mind, would reveal them as a fraud.

🗝 Get comfortable with not knowing. Refrain from apologizing for simply asking a question. And, take solace knowing even Einstein needed help. https://t.co/J6R4dhBwM1
13/ The Expert.

This person tends to measure their competence based on what—and how much—they know or can do. They fear being exposed for not knowing enough.

🗝 Form a tribe of “experts” in related specialties to complement your skill set. Pay it forward by mentoring others.
14/ Sharing from my own personal tug-of-war with impostorism (The Perfectionist) - the power to overcome these self-limiting beliefs begins in 3 steps:

1. Awareness

2. Belonging - I’m not alone

3. Validation - Others I admire have, themselves, felt like a fraud
15/ I hope this helps inspire confidence to believe in—and bet on—yourself, even as it can feel lonely at times.

Take that risk.

And, as Marcus Aurelius reminds us, embrace “the tranquility that comes when you stop caring what *they* say. Or think, or do. Only what you do.”
16/ If you’re interested to dive deeper on the topic, ‘Presence’ by @amyjccuddy is an incredible resource!

https://t.co/TbU982nLOb

And here are a few quicker reads:

https://t.co/MBtJWvrzcL

https://t.co/qC5xdFg4l4

https://t.co/Zl0my08hOo
17/ With a thread on imposter syndrome, I would be remiss not to give a huge thank you to @SahilBloom for the push, and helping me build the confidence to ‘just start’ sharing 🙏🏽

And, for more inspiration check out the rest of my threads here 👇🏽 https://t.co/TcQ05vQ3rc

More from Life

How to get smarter very fast:

Interact with smart people here on Twitter who have different world-views than you do.

And let them change your mind on something.

Here are the 30 people you should follow (along with my favorite tweet from each)👇👇

Twitter can be terrible if you follow negative people.

It can also be more valuable than a college degree if you follow (and network with) the right people.

You get to look right into their brain and read a daily narrative of HOW they think.

Ok lets go:

#1: @ShaanVP

You know he's all about venture capital based entrepreneurship. I'm about small (non-sexy) business. We disagree on a lot of stuff.

But he's done it and he's won. Bonus follow: @theSamParr (@myfirstmilpod podcast


#2: @fortworthchris

He is where I want to be in 15 years. Has built a massive real estate private equity firm from the ground up. Super grounded with what the way he does business and his podcast @theFORTpodcast is top


#3: @Julian

I'm a scattered thinker and procrastinator.

Julian is a master of clear thinking and simple but effective writing. A world class example of content marketing and

You May Also Like

A brief analysis and comparison of the CSS for Twitter's PWA vs Twitter's legacy desktop website. The difference is dramatic and I'll touch on some reasons why.

Legacy site *downloads* ~630 KB CSS per theme and writing direction.

6,769 rules
9,252 selectors
16.7k declarations
3,370 unique declarations
44 media queries
36 unique colors
50 unique background colors
46 unique font sizes
39 unique z-indices

https://t.co/qyl4Bt1i5x


PWA *incrementally generates* ~30 KB CSS that handles all themes and writing directions.

735 rules
740 selectors
757 declarations
730 unique declarations
0 media queries
11 unique colors
32 unique background colors
15 unique font sizes
7 unique z-indices

https://t.co/w7oNG5KUkJ


The legacy site's CSS is what happens when hundreds of people directly write CSS over many years. Specificity wars, redundancy, a house of cards that can't be fixed. The result is extremely inefficient and error-prone styling that punishes users and developers.

The PWA's CSS is generated on-demand by a JS framework that manages styles and outputs "atomic CSS". The framework can enforce strict constraints and perform optimisations, which is why the CSS is so much smaller and safer. Style conflicts and unbounded CSS growth are avoided.
क्या आप जानते हैं कि क्या है, पितृ पक्ष में कौवे को खाना देने के पीछे का वैज्ञानिक कारण!

श्राद्ध पक्ष में कौओं का बड़ा ही महत्व है। कहते है कौआ यम का प्रतीक है, यदि आपके हाथों दिया गया भोजन ग्रहण कर ले, तो ऐसा माना जाता है कि पितरों की कृपा आपके ऊपर है और वे आपसे ख़ुश है।


कुछ लोग कहते हैं की व्यक्ति मरकर सबसे पहले कौवे के रूप में जन्म लेता है और उसे खाना खिलाने से वह भोजन पितरों को मिलता है

शायद हम सबने अपने घर के किसी बड़े बुज़ुर्ग, किसी पंडित या ज्योतिषाचार्य से ये सुना होगा। वे अनगिनत किस्से सुनाएंगे, कहेंगे बड़े बुज़ुर्ग कह गए इसीलिए ऐसा करना

शायद ही हमें कोई इसके पीछे का वैज्ञानिक कारण बता सके।

हमारे ऋषि मुनि और पौराणिक काल में रहने वाले लोग मुर्ख नहीं थे! कभी सोचियेगा कौवों को पितृ पक्ष में खिलाई खीर हमारे पूर्वजों तक कैसे पहुंचेगी?

हमारे ऋषि मुनि विद्वान थे, वे जो बात करते या कहते थे उसके पीछे कोई न कोई वैज्ञानिक कारण छुपा होता था।

एक बहुत रोचक तथ्य है पितृ पक्ष, भादो( भाद्रपद) प्रकृति और काक के बीच।

एक बात जो कह सकते कि हम सब ने स्वतः उग आये पीपल या बरगद का पेड़/ पौधा किसी न किसी दीवार, पुरानी

इमारत, पर्वत या अट्टालिकाओं पर ज़रूर देखा होगा। देखा है न?

ज़रा सोचिये पीपल या बरगद की बीज कैसे पहुंचे होंगे वहाँ तक? इनके बीज इतने हल्के भी नहीं होते के हवा उन्हें उड़ाके ले जा सके।
This is a pretty valiant attempt to defend the "Feminist Glaciology" article, which says conventional wisdom is wrong, and this is a solid piece of scholarship. I'll beg to differ, because I think Jeffery, here, is confusing scholarship with "saying things that seem right".


The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.


Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)


There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.


At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?