I've spent the past year as angry as I've been since the early days of the AIDS epidemic when I had to bury friends in their 20s, 30s because our government didn't care if gay men lived or died from a new virus among us. 1/

Some were put off by my anger, some thought scientists shouldn't be political or if they were tone it down a bit. 2/
I work in public health. I am not a basic scientist or a theoretician. I work in a field that is hemmed in by history and politics on every side. 3/
From the 19th century onwards, we've known that who lives and who dies isn't just a function of biology. The data support this thesis, we call them the social determinants of health. 4/
My friend and colleague Paul Farmer calls out these determinants in more direct terms as pathologies of power, structural violence. 5/
The pathologies of power--have been on full display in 2020. The severity of the epidemic, who got sick, who died, were as much about social and economic forces as they were about a new virus #SARSCoV2. 6/
The health inequities that drove this pandemic were here long before @realDonaldTrump. Democrats & Republicans collectively created the conditions for what we've seen. A disinvestment in public health, a fractured health care system, a weak safety net. 7/ https://t.co/zwyI9hyX9D
If the Democrats win the Senate, the @GOP will still hold the majority of the blame for the carnage. It's all documented by journalists now, the incompetence, cruelty. They can try to spin it otherwise, but let the record show... 8/
But we have a new direction to choose. We can tinker, play the "austerity" politics of the 90s, 00s or think bigger. If we want "out" of #COVID19 and to be ready for the next big pandemic we need a New Deal for Public Health. 9/ https://t.co/7gAFq84QhN
Hope is on the horizon. The new Congress and @joebiden have to go big or go home. 10/
Many conservatives, particularly the @realDonaldTrump dead-enders think my fury is only for the @GOP. They see things in partisan terms. I ask: who has the power? Now @TheDemocrats will have the power. If they fail to deliver, guess what? 11/
I am pro-public health, so are the other activists out there who've been fighting for our lives, whether its been about AIDS, breast cancer, T1 diabetes, TB or HCV. So we will hold @joebiden, @chuckschumer & @SpeakerPelosi's feet to the fire. 12/
We're here to help. All of us would have rushed to help any administration who was serious about the pandemic. But we can't just dust ourselves off and pretend like we can go back to politics as normal. 13/
We need a new politics of care, we need to
"start to build a new movement that heals us and our body politic, and that will allow us—all of us—to survive a pandemic, and then, to thrive." 14/ https://t.co/kU65Lfqrvy
So there is hope this morning, if @senatemajldr is now Senate Minority Leader. He was the single most pernicious obstacle to getting ourselves out of this pandemic better than we came in. There's hope this morning. Who's in for the fight? end/

More from Gregg Gonsalves

And this pathetic move by @JDVance1 isn't what is so odious about him. He's just a phony, all ambition, no real interest in public service. He made a big show out of moving back to #Ohio to start a group to work on the #opioid epidemic. 1/


I work on the opioids, on research on the epidemic, its relationship with HIV/HCV, overdose. I work with data from Ohio, so care deeply about what is going on there. I was excited. Until I started digging. There's no there there. 2/

More here. 3/

You can even read their IRS-990-N filing. Sure looks like @JDVance1 tried real hard on combatting the opioid epidemic in his state. Um. Not. 4/

Now he's moved on to venture capital. Money is more interesting than the suffering of the people of #Ohio I guess. 5/

More from Life

1/“What would need to be true for you to….X”

Why is this the most powerful question you can ask when attempting to reach an agreement with another human being or organization?

A thread, co-written by @deanmbrody:


2/ First, “X” could be lots of things. Examples: What would need to be true for you to

- “Feel it's in our best interest for me to be CMO"
- “Feel that we’re in a good place as a company”
- “Feel that we’re on the same page”
- “Feel that we both got what we wanted from this deal

3/ Normally, we aren’t that direct. Example from startup/VC land:

Founders leave VC meetings thinking that every VC will invest, but they rarely do.

Worse over, the founders don’t know what they need to do in order to be fundable.

4/ So why should you ask the magic Q?

To get clarity.

You want to know where you stand, and what it takes to get what you want in a way that also gets them what they want.

It also holds them (mentally) accountable once the thing they need becomes true.

5/ Staying in the context of soliciting investors, the question is “what would need to be true for you to want to invest (or partner with us on this journey, etc)?”

Multiple responses to this question are likely to deliver a positive result.

You May Also Like

Recently, the @CNIL issued a decision regarding the GDPR compliance of an unknown French adtech company named "Vectaury". It may seem like small fry, but the decision has potential wide-ranging impacts for Google, the IAB framework, and today's adtech. It's thread time! 👇

It's all in French, but if you're up for it you can read:
• Their blog post (lacks the most interesting details):
https://t.co/PHkDcOT1hy
• Their high-level legal decision: https://t.co/hwpiEvjodt
• The full notification: https://t.co/QQB7rfynha

I've read it so you needn't!

Vectaury was collecting geolocation data in order to create profiles (eg. people who often go to this or that type of shop) so as to power ad targeting. They operate through embedded SDKs and ad bidding, making them invisible to users.

The @CNIL notes that profiling based off of geolocation presents particular risks since it reveals people's movements and habits. As risky, the processing requires consent — this will be the heart of their assessment.

Interesting point: they justify the decision in part because of how many people COULD be targeted in this way (rather than how many have — though they note that too). Because it's on a phone, and many have phones, it is considered large-scale processing no matter what.