You folks kept saying stuff flying in the air WITHOUT EVIDENCE! Who does that? Who?
Dear @aliciakeys, howdy?
I saw the Open Letter you & some fellows wrote, addressing President Buhari.
The letter was not only rude in tone & condensending, it lacked evidence, verbose & irrational.
How you didn't know the joke was on you guys is what I would need to think on.
You folks kept saying stuff flying in the air WITHOUT EVIDENCE! Who does that? Who?
No respect whatsoever sha!
Instead, 53 of you were just frothing in the mouth.
Wait, you did not get a lawyer to write that piece for you? Or you did? Who was the lawyer please?
We have enough IPOB terrorists race on this.
How dare you? Who the hell are you guys? Ehn?
Who sent you? IPOB, the terrorists? You think you can talk about Nigeria for Nigerians better than Nigerians?
You ought to have stick to the word, "some". Get sense!
*Shaking my head
1. NOBODY died at Lekki Toll Plaza on October 20, 2020.
2. There are no dead bodies or family or friends of any dead persons as you alluded.
3. You must apologize for that ill advices & saucy letter you wrote to President Buhari ASAP
4. Recant that letter
6. You cannot deceive the international community with WELL COOKED LIES because you are celebrities so-called.
7. Have your lawyers do a thorough job with the apology letter to President Buhari
9. All accounts frozen were done through the courts.
10. Apply to court seeking redress for the court ordered frozen accounts.
11. All criminal protester arrested will have their day in court.
12. Get your lawyers to do their jobs.
13. End.
More from Life
"I lied about my basic beliefs in order to keep a prestigious job. Now that it will be zero-cost to me, I have a few things to say."
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".
As a dean of a major academic institution, I could not have said this. But I will now. Requiring such statements in applications for appointments and promotions is an affront to academic freedom, and diminishes the true value of diversity, equity of inclusion by trivializing it. https://t.co/NfcI5VLODi
— Jeffrey Flier (@jflier) November 10, 2018
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".
