Here’s a lengthy post asking: #WhatDoWeNow & I posit, #ArrestEmAll ! Let’s start w/ @dotjenna (now deleted)! She id’s as ‘radio host’ & flew on private jet to storm the capitol!

Below @mikegalsworthy captured her Twitter posts
1/?
@texasgop @tedcruz @KenPaxtonTX #txlege

How the world is, and has been controlled by the same families for millennia

These are the secret elite families that rule the world from behind the scenes and what we can do to change society for the better

💥MUST READ THREAD💥 SENSITIVE CONTENT💥

13 blood line families, the Venetian, they are the enemy of us all and they are chameleons rats that live underground...
They live by the law of the sea, they are pirate ships on maritime...
Everything they have done is unlawful of gods law

To be with god we have to raise our chrism oil to heave up to heaven up-on earth, these people don’t want to be near god so they are taking the adrenals for life giving properties, when they torture a sentinel life to the point of death the body is attempting to stay alive so...

enormously powerful secretion are realised into the system to put the body into shock so it doesn’t feel the horror of the pain, then to protect systems they can be put on bare minimum so they can survive. Our bodies are absolute miracles of creation, by the golden creator...

and we are golden children. This is why they take that from the sacred golden child, they take abortions, the babies are kept alive and harvested, this is divinity, they want a long life but don’t want to go through god so they take it by force.

Why would Intelligence be interested in faking a serial killer? Simple: to create instability and fear. This was one of the prime goals of Intelligence at the time, and of course it still is.

In the 1960's, the FBI had COINTELPRO and the CIA had CHAOS, and both programs have been partially declassified now, enough so that we know the one of the directives of each program was destabilization.

And this was not just destabilization of the “enemy.” This was a general destabilization of the whole society. Since the entire society was seen to be moving left in the 1960's, the FBI and the CIA felt that general destabilization was necessary to maintain control.

Of course they had been creating fear since the end of WW2, but that was mainly to keep military expenditures high. They needed to justify continued military spending, as well as spending to expand Intelligence, and the best way to do that was to manufacture conflict and fear.

The Cold War was manufactured by both sides, since it allowed for massive “defense” budgets both here and in Russia. The Red Scare in the 1950's was part of that creation of general fear.

Several questions about protecting the inaugural, put to me by @ShawnAndersonDC and @bhaseltonWTOP on the air @wtop today.

1. How is Secret Service planning to protect the Inauguration from the violence that occurred last week?

Planning is the key word. They’ve been planning this inauguration for more than a year. And it’s important to note that comparing security around the Capitol on an ordinary day and an inauguration are like comparing an Apple to an entire Orange tree.

On Inauguration Day there are many thousands of people involved in protection that we don't see. There are technological capabilities, military and cyber assets, There are #WMD assets. The air, water and land are covered like a blanket.

2. What kind of threats are you hearing about...not just for the 20th...but other days too?

Many looking to engage violence in the run up to or during the inaugural are really upset because some of their social media sites are being taken offline, but plenty of others are still active and they are STILL talking about violence on those sites.

The solution to knife crime is not a quick fix and it isn't something that is going to come cheaply, I have been involved in local task forces discussions with MP's and been on countless marches but the problem is no one listens to the people on the ground;

millions of pounds get wasted producing white papers;
that never get anything done. 

 The current Government rhetoric about being tough on crime ; is all well and good but being tough is not a deterrent,

nowhere in the world is there any evidence that supports the theory that harsher sentences reduce crime,
giving a bigger sentence for using, only deals with problem after the event;
what needs to happen is much early intervention and a deeper look at the
problems in society

It is no secret that crime and poverty are linked if you have more poverty you have more crime, if the environment that people live in is run down and uncared for, then you have more crime

There is also a link between crime, care, and school exclusions.  The current figures show that  you are  12 times more likely to end up in prison if you are excluded;  and in UK prisons it shows that around 63% of prisoners had some form of school exclusion