She is also co-author if the Equal Treatment Bench Book and writes about how the judges are trained by Gendered Intelligence
Some WESC submissions that are worth a read....(my thread of bookmarks)
Judge Paula Grey is president of the Gender Recognition Panel
She doesn't make any recommendations, but she sets out how the process currently works
She is also co-author if the Equal Treatment Bench Book and writes about how the judges are trained by Gendered Intelligence
https://t.co/bOn9XecAkz
On single sex spaces they say the law is clear that service providers are able to restrict access to spaces on the basis of biological sex where there is clear justification.
Their members want trans survivors to get support they need but not by undermining their ability to serve women with female staff & female only services
They highlight lack of clarity
https://t.co/p7096sZcos
They have moved on alot - they have been consulting with members since last year, and have had the courage to say what their members told them, not what Stonewall wanted to hear
https://t.co/CM3V0mL02u
Something wrong with this listening process I think!
https://t.co/FxVIy3qLNk
@cwknews @charlesworth102 and the team
https://t.co/tXRoJuSSih
https://t.co/ESi59oPB65
Obviously they submitted this evidence before Keira Bell v Tavistock - maybe they will have a rethink?
They seem to have lost all sight of safeguarding principles https://t.co/xgnx7dLz0x
They want adults to keep secrets with children, and to lie to other children about sex.
They say that GD is neither a medical or a MH issue based on survey responses to the govts consultation.
What is the point of doctors or medical research, eh?
https://t.co/iZtRxHpsSK
(but they also seem to have forgotten sex in their commitment to equality, at paragraph 11. Sex Matters!)
https://t.co/DM6ICeysuA
https://t.co/7qUSga9Abl
These were *not* the findings of the Swedish study....
A lot of evidence was published by @Commonswomequ
— Maya Forstater (@MForstater) January 13, 2021
Its worth reading the additional evidence of @Docstockk Rosa Freedman and @ProfAliceS side by side with @alexsharpe64
They both talk about the Swedish Study..... https://t.co/nIewfDsSNrhttps://t.co/Yl5Vy7z2C6
More from Law
You May Also Like
The entire discussion around Facebook’s disclosures of what happened in 2016 is very frustrating. No exec stopped any investigations, but there were a lot of heated discussions about what to publish and when.
In the spring and summer of 2016, as reported by the Times, activity we traced to GRU was reported to the FBI. This was the standard model of interaction companies used for nation-state attacks against likely US targeted.
In the Spring of 2017, after a deep dive into the Fake News phenomena, the security team wanted to publish an update that covered what we had learned. At this point, we didn’t have any advertising content or the big IRA cluster, but we did know about the GRU model.
This report when through dozens of edits as different equities were represented. I did not have any meetings with Sheryl on the paper, but I can’t speak to whether she was in the loop with my higher-ups.
In the end, the difficult question of attribution was settled by us pointing to the DNI report instead of saying Russia or GRU directly. In my pre-briefs with members of Congress, I made it clear that we believed this action was GRU.
The story doesn\u2019t say you were told not to... it says you did so without approval and they tried to obfuscate what you found. Is that true?
— Sarah Frier (@sarahfrier) November 15, 2018
In the spring and summer of 2016, as reported by the Times, activity we traced to GRU was reported to the FBI. This was the standard model of interaction companies used for nation-state attacks against likely US targeted.
In the Spring of 2017, after a deep dive into the Fake News phenomena, the security team wanted to publish an update that covered what we had learned. At this point, we didn’t have any advertising content or the big IRA cluster, but we did know about the GRU model.
This report when through dozens of edits as different equities were represented. I did not have any meetings with Sheryl on the paper, but I can’t speak to whether she was in the loop with my higher-ups.
In the end, the difficult question of attribution was settled by us pointing to the DNI report instead of saying Russia or GRU directly. In my pre-briefs with members of Congress, I made it clear that we believed this action was GRU.
