Reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

If you are one of those conservatives right now saying "we will not #Resist, we're better than the left" then FUCK YOU

YOU are the reason we're here right now

Anyone not declaring total war on this joke of an administration is beyond saving

1/

For the last four years these animals have weaponized the courts, the media, their bolshevik shock troops and generally made life nightmarish for anyone who opposed them

They committed to their ideology and realised that THIS IS NOT A GAME

2/
You are facing an enemy that is stronger, has greater reach, limitless resources and excels at propaganda

If you sit there talking about honour, decorum and "fair play" YOU WILL DESERVE EVERYTHING THAT HAPPENS OVER THE NEXT FOUR YEARS

3/

More from Law

Hot take: Courts might be able to review the legality of this impeachment, even under current political-question doctrine. Here’s why and how the issue might arise:


Suppose Senate convicts and disqualifies Trump from ever holding federal office. Trump files paperwork to run anyway, but state officials deny his application, citing his Senate impeachment judgment. Trump sues, arguing that the judgment is void.

Normally a legal dispute about a prospective candidates eligibility to run would certainly present a justiciable case or controversy. But are courts bound to accept the Senate impeachment judgment as valid? Maybe not. Here’s why:

According to Article I, “The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments.” This is a small amount of judicial power vested in Congress. When trying impeachments, the Senate sits as a court.

The Senate’s judicial power includes the power to decide relevant legal questions that arise, such as what procedures are sufficient to constitute a “trial” w/in the Constitution’s meaning. Such legal determinations are conclusive, as SCOTUS held in Nixon v. United States (1993).

You May Also Like