Crucial hearing in the farmers protests cases in the Supreme Court today.

A bench headed by Chief Justice of India will hear the cases post 11 AM.

#FarmersProtest
#FarmLaws

The Delhi police has filed an injunction application to stop the proposed tractor rally by protesting farmers on the Republic Day.

On January 12, the SC had issued notice on the petition. It will be considered today.

#FarmersProtest
#FarmLaws

https://t.co/KuBweGoKQb
In another significant development, one farmers' union, Bhartiya Kisan Union Lokshakti, filed an application seeking the complete reconstitution of the Committee constituted by the SC for negotiations. One member, BS Mann, had recused earlier.

https://t.co/kskfPAOn4w
On Jan 12, the top court had stayed the implementation of the farm laws after observing that the Centre has failed in its negotiations. The SC also constituted a committee for talks. However, the protesting unions said they will not appear before the committee.

#FarmersProtest
The SC observed in its order that the staying the implementation will "assuage hurt feelings of farmers" and will "encourage them to return".

Read Summary Of Supreme Court Directions

#FarmersProtest #FarmLaws

https://t.co/pvHi5Wz4uR
A notable feature of the composition of the committee was that all four members have expressed open views in support of implementation of farm laws.

BS Mann later recused.

SC Forms Committee On Farm Laws With Members Supporting Farm Laws Implementation

https://t.co/FdjKW0lGRD
There is a change in the composition of the bench today.

Justices L Nageswara Rao and Vineet Saran replace Justices AS Bopanna and V Ramasubramanian in the bench.

The bench sits at 11 AM.

Follow this thread for live updates from the hearing.

#FarmersProtests
#SupremeCourt
The bench comprising CJI SA Bobde, Justices L N Rao and Vineet Saran has assembled.

#FarmersProtests cases are listed as items 13 and 14.

Follow this thread for live updates from the hearing.
The Supreme Court has taken up the cases relating to farmers protests.

Follow this thread for live updates from #SupremeCourt

#FarmersProstests #FarmLaws
CJI : The question of entry into Delhi is a law and order situation that is to be determined by the police.

AG : This will be illegal. The entry of 5000 people into Delhi.

CJI : You are at liberty to invoke all powers under the law.

#SupremeCourt

#FarmersProstests #FarmLaws
CJI : We have told the AG and SG before that whether who should allow and who should not be allowed and the number of people who can enter are all matters of law and order to be dealt with the by the police. We are not the first authority.

#SupremeCourt

#FarmersProstests
AG : An order to that effect may be passed. That will strengthen our hands.

CJI : Does the Union of India want the court to say that you have powers under law?

AG : We are facing an unprecedented situation.

#SupremeCourt

#FarmersProstests #FarmLaws
AG: Since the court has taken up the issue...

CJI : We have not taken up the entire issue. The intervention of the court has been misunderstood.

#SupremeCourt

#FarmersProstests #FarmLaws
CJI : Anyway we are adjourning the case today. The other bench will consider day after tomorrow(a different bench composition is sitting today)

#SupremeCourt

#FarmersProstests #FarmLaws
CJI : Are farmers unions appearing today?

Dushyant Dava says he is appearing.

CJI : We will hear everyone day after.

#SupremeCourt

#FarmersProstests #FarmLaws

More from Live Law

#LIVE Delhi High Court Women Lawyers Forum in Association with LiveLaw is conducting a Webinar on the topic 'Attack On Love Marriages And Freedom Of Choice'.

#FreedomOfChoice


Watch the Webinar live at :

YouTube link:
https://t.co/l074foe9RA

Facebook link:
https://t.co/d0m3h0Ut1w

Instagram Link:

Advocate Kajal Chandra begins the webinar and introduces the panelist Justice AP Shah, Delhi High Court’s Former Chief Justice. Advocate Gayatri Virmani introduces Human Rights Activist Jagmati Sangwan.

#FreedomOfChoice

The moderator Adv Chandra questions Justice Shah: Do the freedom of Religious ordinance of laws stand the test of Constitutionality and in your opinion, do they violate the fundamental right of liberty including the freedom to choose? #FreedomOfOpinion

Delhi High Court’s Former Chief Justice AP Shah: This topic cannot be discussed without referring to the Indian Constitution that guarantees Justice, Liberty, Equality and Fraternity and protects dignity of individual and Unity and integrity of the Nation. #FreedomOfChoice

More from India

Now this is provoking me to write!

The schism of BJP- RSS ideology.

Full blown Schizophrenia if one wants to psychoanalyze BJP.
#doublebind where a parent keeps giving double messages to their confused children. They adore the parent for one thing and hate them for another.


How can BJP sustain itself with this kind of internal schism? In other words no samanjas or clarity of what they stand for?

Its exploding now. The madness.
People airing out Gandhi's sexuality out of context and irrelevant to him being killed by Godse.Supporting Godse's action

But not understanding that the same reasons why Godse was killed are the reasons why BJP leaders today hail Gandhi as Bapu or Mahatma. On #MartyrsDay
Very dangerous mind or #headgames being played out here. Our country is a large scale mental asylum with broken psyche.

Sanatana Dharma does not need more Nathuram Godses. We need more Shri Vidyaranyas and Adi Shankaras who would build Hindu Rajya through Raja and kshatriya Dharma.
Nathuram Godse as a Brahmana weakened his brahmanatwam by adopting a Nationalist ideology.

Instead he could have used his pourusham to garber a Sanatani movement to fight against INC and Gandhian ideology.

He dissented from RSS and started his own Hindu Rashtra Dal and also was a member of Hindu Mahasabha. However he did not fall back on our darshana s to understand
In his letters describing the India Mission, Carey has given us an insight into how the society functioned then, of how the minds of the people worked and what methods the missionaries used to approach and brainwash the common people.


It is entirely possible that,Carey in his arrogance of being the white man and hence more civilized,his inability to under the Hindu scriptures and his natural disdain for the learned community coupled with his inherent hatred for the idolaters may have exaggerated the incidents.

In fact, considering the venom with which he has spoken about Hinduism and it's practices, it's likely that he has exaggerated these incidents. But it cannot be denied that these incidents did happen even if they may not have been on scale at which Carey has described.

One of his journal entry mentions a debate which happened in a temple in front of around 200 people. Carey describes having debated with two learned men and goes on to say when both learned men failed to answer his questions, he went on to preach the gospel to the assembled crowd


In a letter dated 30th June,1795 he goes on to gleefully narate how Hindus were unaware of their own scriptures and how an supposed expert named a grammar book when he was questioned as which scripture said that the Murti is God.

You May Also Like

1/ Some initial thoughts on personal moats:

Like company moats, your personal moat should be a competitive advantage that is not only durable—it should also compound over time.

Characteristics of a personal moat below:


2/ Like a company moat, you want to build career capital while you sleep.

As Andrew Chen noted:


3/ You don’t want to build a competitive advantage that is fleeting or that will get commoditized

Things that might get commoditized over time (some longer than


4/ Before the arrival of recorded music, what used to be scarce was the actual music itself — required an in-person artist.

After recorded music, the music itself became abundant and what became scarce was curation, distribution, and self space.

5/ Similarly, in careers, what used to be (more) scarce were things like ideas, money, and exclusive relationships.

In the internet economy, what has become scarce are things like specific knowledge, rare & valuable skills, and great reputations.
A brief analysis and comparison of the CSS for Twitter's PWA vs Twitter's legacy desktop website. The difference is dramatic and I'll touch on some reasons why.

Legacy site *downloads* ~630 KB CSS per theme and writing direction.

6,769 rules
9,252 selectors
16.7k declarations
3,370 unique declarations
44 media queries
36 unique colors
50 unique background colors
46 unique font sizes
39 unique z-indices

https://t.co/qyl4Bt1i5x


PWA *incrementally generates* ~30 KB CSS that handles all themes and writing directions.

735 rules
740 selectors
757 declarations
730 unique declarations
0 media queries
11 unique colors
32 unique background colors
15 unique font sizes
7 unique z-indices

https://t.co/w7oNG5KUkJ


The legacy site's CSS is what happens when hundreds of people directly write CSS over many years. Specificity wars, redundancy, a house of cards that can't be fixed. The result is extremely inefficient and error-prone styling that punishes users and developers.

The PWA's CSS is generated on-demand by a JS framework that manages styles and outputs "atomic CSS". The framework can enforce strict constraints and perform optimisations, which is why the CSS is so much smaller and safer. Style conflicts and unbounded CSS growth are avoided.