A Bench headed by Justice Ashok Bhushan will shortly hear a plea by Former CJ of Andhra Pradesh HC Justice V. Eshwaraiah against an order passed by HC directing for an investigation into his private telephone conversation regarding charges of misconduct against sitting SC judge.

Advocate Prashant Bhushan appears.

#SupremeCourt @pbhushan1
Sr. Adv. Kapil Sibal states that he’s appearing for the Intervenors and has nothing to say at the moment.

Bhushan narrates the events to the Bench.

#SupremeCourt @pbhushan1 @KapilSibal
Bhishan: How can a private conversation be made a subject of inquiry ? What is the crime in having a private conversation, even if it’s about the conduct of a SC judge ? Without even saying into me, the HC orders an inquiry ? How can that be done ?

#SupremeCourt @pbhushan1
Bhushan: Your Lordship will need to issue notice and stay the inquiry as the inquiry is completely out of order.

#SupremeCourt @pbhushan1 @KapilSibal
Justice Bhushan to Sibal: What do you want to say ?

Sibal: I just want you to issue notice on this Application. There is nothing private about this conversation. This is a motivated attack on the system.

#SupremeCourt @pbhushan1 @KapilSibal
Sibal: What is private about this conversation ?

Bhushan: It’s between two people.

Sibal: It’s a motivated attack.

#SupremeCourt @pbhushan1 @KapilSibal
Justice Bhushan: Do you admit that this conversation took place ?

Bhushan: The transcript is a bit incorrect, but it did take place.

Bench: File the correct transcript.

#SupremeCourt @pbhushan1 @KapilSibal
Bench: Let us see what you have stated about this conversation and what does your Affidavit say.

#SupremeCourt @pbhushan1 @KapilSibal
Bench: It is better if you file an Affidavit where you admit that the conversation took place and what needs to change. We’ll take it up then and pass the order.

#SupremeCourt @pbhushan1 @KapilSibal
Bench to Sibal: We will not hear intervention right now. Let him file Affidavit first.

Bhushan: We’ll file copy of PIL that was not filed before.

#SupremeCourt @pbhushan1 @KapilSibal
Matter will now be listed on Monday.

Bhushan: I’m surprised that Mr. Sibal and Mr. Salve are appearing for some intervenors.

Bench: It’s always a pleasure to hear everybody.

#SupremeCourt @pbhushan1 @KapilSibal

More from Live Law

More from India

You May Also Like

Recently, the @CNIL issued a decision regarding the GDPR compliance of an unknown French adtech company named "Vectaury". It may seem like small fry, but the decision has potential wide-ranging impacts for Google, the IAB framework, and today's adtech. It's thread time! 👇

It's all in French, but if you're up for it you can read:
• Their blog post (lacks the most interesting details):
https://t.co/PHkDcOT1hy
• Their high-level legal decision: https://t.co/hwpiEvjodt
• The full notification: https://t.co/QQB7rfynha

I've read it so you needn't!

Vectaury was collecting geolocation data in order to create profiles (eg. people who often go to this or that type of shop) so as to power ad targeting. They operate through embedded SDKs and ad bidding, making them invisible to users.

The @CNIL notes that profiling based off of geolocation presents particular risks since it reveals people's movements and habits. As risky, the processing requires consent — this will be the heart of their assessment.

Interesting point: they justify the decision in part because of how many people COULD be targeted in this way (rather than how many have — though they note that too). Because it's on a phone, and many have phones, it is considered large-scale processing no matter what.