SSR Case Media Trial : Bombay High Court to pronounce verdict at 11 AM today on the PILs seeking regulation of 'media trial'. The PILs were filed in the context of reportage of Sushant Singh Rajput death case.

#BombayHighCourt
#SSRCase #MediaTrial

A division bench of Chief Justice Dipankar Dutta and Justice GS Kulkarni had reserved verdict on the PILs on November 6.
During the hearing, the bench made several sharp oral observations criticizing the media reports on #SSRCase.

Here is a recap :

#SushanthSinghRajput
(From October 29, 2020)

'Asking Public About Who To Be Arrested Is Investigative Journalism?' Bombay HC Asks Republic TV In SSR Media Trial Case -

@republic

#RepublicTV

https://t.co/r8pLUyiSHA
(From October 21, 2020)

'If You Become Investigator, Prosecutor & Judge, Why Are We Here?' Bombay HC Expresses Concerns Over Media Trial

#SushanthSinghRajput
#SSR

https://t.co/XGK9yixtV1
(From October 23, 2020)

Media Highly Polarized Now; Journalists Were Responsible & Neutral In Past, Bombay High Court Says While Hearing SSR Media Trial Case

#BombayHighCourt
#SSRCase

https://t.co/AcMrhaU2R4
(From October 29, 2020)

[SSR Medial Trial] 'We Would Like Media Not To Cross Boundaries': Bombay High Court Mulls Guidelines For Reporting On Investigation

https://t.co/q2hbnFhR8w
Bench of CJ Dipankar Dutta and GS Kulkarni convene for pronouncement of the #mediatrial judgement.

#BombayHighCourt
Bombay High Court will pronounce the Judgement at 2.30pm.

#MediaTrial
#SSR #SushantSinghRajput #BombayHighCourt
The bench starts pronouncement of verdict in the #MediaTrial case.

#MediaTrial
#SSR #SushantSinghRajput #BombayHighCourt
CJ Dutta : We have overruled the preliminary objections against the maintainability of the PILs

#MediaTrial
#SSR #SushantSinghRajput #BombayHighCourt
CJ Dutta : We have said that the trial by media interferes with the criminal investigation by police.

#MediaTrial
#SSR #SushantSinghRajput #BombayHighCourt
CJ Dutta : We have held that media trial runs counter to the program code framed under the Cable TV Act.

#MediaTrial
#SSR #SushantSinghRajput #BombayHighCourt
CJ Dutta : We have also issued guidelines for the print and electronic media regarding the reporting of cases of death and suicide. We have made the Press Council of India guidelines applicable to the electronic media as well.

#MediaTrial
#SSR #SushantSinghRajput
[Breaking] Bombay High Court observes that some reporting of the Republic TV @republic and Times Now @TimesNow against Mumbai police @MumbaiPolice in the SSR matter are "prima facie contemptuous" but refrains from taking action.
'Press/media ought to avoid discussions, debates relating to criminal investigation and should confine only to informative reports in such matters in public interest', Bombay HC observes.
'We observe that media should observe restraint in discussions about on going investigation so as to prejudice the rights of the accused and witness' - Bombay High Court
Publishing a confession alleged to have been made by an accused as if it is an admissible evidence without letting the public know about its inadmissibility should be avoided - Bombay High Court
While reporting suicide, to suggest that the person was of weak character, should be avoided - Bombay High Court.
Reconstructing of crime scenes, interviews with potential witnesses, leaking sensitive and confidential information should be avoided - Bombay High Court.
Investigative agencies are entitled to keep secrecy about the on going investigation and they are under no obligation to divulge information - Bombay High Court.
Bombay High Court says it is adopting the suggestion of Sr Adv Arvind Datar regarding the appointing of a public information officer by police to give authentic information about investigation.
'Findings and observations in the judgment are not a reflection on the pending investigations and the concerned criminal court should decide the issues uninfluenced by the observations' - Bombay High Court

More from Live Law

More from India

Now this is provoking me to write!

The schism of BJP- RSS ideology.

Full blown Schizophrenia if one wants to psychoanalyze BJP.
#doublebind where a parent keeps giving double messages to their confused children. They adore the parent for one thing and hate them for another.


How can BJP sustain itself with this kind of internal schism? In other words no samanjas or clarity of what they stand for?

Its exploding now. The madness.
People airing out Gandhi's sexuality out of context and irrelevant to him being killed by Godse.Supporting Godse's action

But not understanding that the same reasons why Godse was killed are the reasons why BJP leaders today hail Gandhi as Bapu or Mahatma. On #MartyrsDay
Very dangerous mind or #headgames being played out here. Our country is a large scale mental asylum with broken psyche.

Sanatana Dharma does not need more Nathuram Godses. We need more Shri Vidyaranyas and Adi Shankaras who would build Hindu Rajya through Raja and kshatriya Dharma.
Nathuram Godse as a Brahmana weakened his brahmanatwam by adopting a Nationalist ideology.

Instead he could have used his pourusham to garber a Sanatani movement to fight against INC and Gandhian ideology.

He dissented from RSS and started his own Hindu Rashtra Dal and also was a member of Hindu Mahasabha. However he did not fall back on our darshana s to understand

You May Also Like

This is a pretty valiant attempt to defend the "Feminist Glaciology" article, which says conventional wisdom is wrong, and this is a solid piece of scholarship. I'll beg to differ, because I think Jeffery, here, is confusing scholarship with "saying things that seem right".


The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.


Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)


There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.


At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?