Hydra vulgaris Series of video clips
Part 1
...inserting an ingredient derived from
a marine invertebrate, mNeonGreen, 💉... mNeonGreen has unknown antigenicity.
Download doc here: https://t.co/HIVJSs9zsH
Sauce: https://t.co/8YDBxyGKeM
Archive: https://t.co/HZem1rXWJz
Revelation 13:1
The Beast out of the Sea
The dragon [a] stood on the shore of the sea. And I saw a beast coming out of the sea. It had ten horns and seven heads, with ten crowns on its horns, and on each head a blasphemous name.
Diminutive from the same as thera; a dangerous animal -- (venomous, wild) beast.
θήρα (théra): a hunting, prey
Usage: hunting, entrapping; prey, game; a net, means of capture. 🤔
Blasphemous evil reverses spiritual and moral realities
A venomous sea (water) arose creature from out of the sea (water) with heads and horns hunting prey of a blasphemous character, evil against moral realities not from GOD... 🤔 genetically modified🤔
Cell lines were inoculated with the SARS-CoV-2 reporter virus encoding mNeonGreen (icSARS-CoV-2-mNG) and infected cells (green fluorescence).
Sauce: figure 1 https://t.co/hZuzsNrZY6
H/t @DrutangAtHome
Hydra=skull head octopus tentacles
Octopus = Rockfeller
The group OCTOGON & WEF
Skull = skull and bones
ALL Pushing toward a technocrat authoritarian one world gov...
Stange Coincidence... or something else entirely...🤔
@elleprovocateur https://t.co/1t7Ben3xUe
Learning thread.
— Cory Morningstar (@elleprovocateur) October 2, 2021
"By 2030, our goal is to enable access to #digitalidentity for every person on the planet." \u2014 2017 ID2020 Summit
2014: ID2020 public-private p'ship
2016: ID2020 Alliance: Accenture, #Microsoft, #Gavi, #Rockefeller, IDEO
2021: #ID2020 launches #GoodHealthPass pic.twitter.com/nehdGsjkxe
More from TXgrlWatching🌏WakeUp⚔🛡
Reminder America has been in State of Emergency since 1933...
Senate Report Written in 1973, says “Since March 9, 1933, the United States has been in a state of declared national emergency…Under the powers delegated by these statutes, the president may: seize property;…
seize commodities; assign military forces abroad; institute martial law; seize and control all transportation and communication;…restrict travel; and, in a plethora of particular ways, control the lives of all American citizens.”
The president can act through Executive Order, Presidential Proclamation, or through his many agencies, which include most of the alphabet agencies.
Senate Report🔻
https://t.co/1WaeF2Rxf6
In the introduction to Senate Report 93-549:
"A majority of the people of the united States have lived all their lives under emergency rule.-(Exhibit 2)
Remember, this report was produced in 1973. The introduction goes on to say:
"For 40 years, freedoms and governmental procedures guaranteed by the Constitution have, in varying degrees, been abridged by laws brought into force by states of national emergency."
Senate Report Written in 1973, says “Since March 9, 1933, the United States has been in a state of declared national emergency…Under the powers delegated by these statutes, the president may: seize property;…
— Bad Legal Takes (@BadLegalTakes) June 24, 2021
seize commodities; assign military forces abroad; institute martial law; seize and control all transportation and communication;…restrict travel; and, in a plethora of particular ways, control the lives of all American citizens.”
The president can act through Executive Order, Presidential Proclamation, or through his many agencies, which include most of the alphabet agencies.
Senate Report🔻
https://t.co/1WaeF2Rxf6
In the introduction to Senate Report 93-549:
"A majority of the people of the united States have lived all their lives under emergency rule.-(Exhibit 2)
Remember, this report was produced in 1973. The introduction goes on to say:
"For 40 years, freedoms and governmental procedures guaranteed by the Constitution have, in varying degrees, been abridged by laws brought into force by states of national emergency."
You May Also Like
This is a pretty valiant attempt to defend the "Feminist Glaciology" article, which says conventional wisdom is wrong, and this is a solid piece of scholarship. I'll beg to differ, because I think Jeffery, here, is confusing scholarship with "saying things that seem right".
The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.
Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)
There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.
At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?
Imagine for a moment the most obscurantist, jargon-filled, po-mo article the politically correct academy might produce. Pure SJW nonsense. Got it? Chances are you're imagining something like the infamous "Feminist Glaciology" article from a few years back.https://t.co/NRaWNREBvR pic.twitter.com/qtSFBYY80S
— Jeffrey Sachs (@JeffreyASachs) October 13, 2018
The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.
Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)
There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.
At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?
Trump is gonna let the Mueller investigation end all on it's own. It's obvious. All the hysteria of the past 2 weeks about his supposed impending firing of Mueller was a distraction. He was never going to fire Mueller and he's not going to
Mueller's officially end his investigation all on his own and he's gonna say he found no evidence of Trump campaign/Russian collusion during the 2016 election.
Democrats & DNC Media are going to LITERALLY have nothing coherent to say in response to that.
Mueller's team was 100% partisan.
That's why it's brilliant. NOBODY will be able to claim this team of partisan Democrats didn't go the EXTRA 20 MILES looking for ANY evidence they could find of Trump campaign/Russian collusion during the 2016 election
They looked high.
They looked low.
They looked underneath every rock, behind every tree, into every bush.
And they found...NOTHING.
Those saying Mueller will file obstruction charges against Trump: laughable.
What documents did Trump tell the Mueller team it couldn't have? What witnesses were withheld and never interviewed?
THERE WEREN'T ANY.
Mueller got full 100% cooperation as the record will show.
BREAKING: President Donald Trump has submitted his answers to questions from special counsel Robert Mueller
— Ryan Saavedra (@RealSaavedra) November 20, 2018
Mueller's officially end his investigation all on his own and he's gonna say he found no evidence of Trump campaign/Russian collusion during the 2016 election.
Democrats & DNC Media are going to LITERALLY have nothing coherent to say in response to that.
Mueller's team was 100% partisan.
That's why it's brilliant. NOBODY will be able to claim this team of partisan Democrats didn't go the EXTRA 20 MILES looking for ANY evidence they could find of Trump campaign/Russian collusion during the 2016 election
They looked high.
They looked low.
They looked underneath every rock, behind every tree, into every bush.
And they found...NOTHING.
Those saying Mueller will file obstruction charges against Trump: laughable.
What documents did Trump tell the Mueller team it couldn't have? What witnesses were withheld and never interviewed?
THERE WEREN'T ANY.
Mueller got full 100% cooperation as the record will show.
