start of a long list of issues. First while you are seemingly secure in DC you are not across an ocean like the English King was in 1775. The Constitution provided remedies. When an independent judiciarybis no longer independent then there is another check

You are that check. You see here in America we are fed up with lockdowns, we are fed up with complacent legislatures, we are fed up with our protests being squashed with local government intervention. We have sought every avenue to have our voices heard.
Our protests were met with violence from the left, our affidavits were scorned and not given ear in the courts which are supposed to be unbiased and non partisan places for our offenses to be judged. We have protested the heavy ham handed lockdowns.
The media has turned a blind eye to our plea's instead siding with DC. Did anyone see the voting map? Little dots of blue in a sea of Red? Our forefathers who were quakers, protestants, and puritans were very patient with a King.
We are not quakers, protestants or puritans and we are fed up. The same issues facing Britain in 1776 now are present in America. You live in a city, DC that thinks the world revolves around it. It does not. You think you are insulated like a British King. You are not.
The Judiciary which is supposed to be the arbiter of justice has in fact presented itself as blinder than lady justice refusing like the courts of a British tyrant to hear a case or even give just cause for not hearing a case.
You appear to think you have been appointed by God when in fact none of you were elected by God to your position. You ran a race and common men voted so your power is not innate in any aspect. The power granted you was from the same people you seem to despise now
The utter arrogance of elected individuals to think that giving ear to the people who elected them is beneath them is astounding. You were granted by those people your position and those same people you scoff at from your seat are the same ones who will unseat you.
You have touted the Constitution but now think that questions of election fraud are beneath you since you got your seat. We shall see how that plays out. You have lost touch with the people you represent. In fact you seem only content to represent only your own
political interest and not the desire or the fortitude to seek the truth. When a king and his parliament and courts rejected redress and people exhausted their options a fire was stoked and a solution was acted upon.
You sit in very perilous situation. Voices lifted and unheard become actions of people who feel their rights are gone. I do not invoke open conflict. This is what courts were supposed to keep from happening by giving ear and weighing in and righting wrongs.
When all else fails it becomes incumbent upon the political body to step up with courage and either ask the courts to step in and adjudicate a solution or like our forefathers take on the issue despite the peril which might befall them. Do any of you have this fortitude?
WE ARE WATCHING, WE HAVE BEEN PATIENT, AND WE STILL HOPE THERE EXISTS MEN OF CHARACTER AND FORTITUDE WHO CAN AGAINST ALL POLITICAL, SOCIAL, AND SOCIETAL PERIL REALIZE THE REPUBLIC MUST SURVIVE.

More from History

You May Also Like

This is a pretty valiant attempt to defend the "Feminist Glaciology" article, which says conventional wisdom is wrong, and this is a solid piece of scholarship. I'll beg to differ, because I think Jeffery, here, is confusing scholarship with "saying things that seem right".


The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.


Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)


There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.


At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?
This is NONSENSE. The people who take photos with their books on instagram are known to be voracious readers who graciously take time to review books and recommend them to their followers. Part of their medium is to take elaborate, beautiful photos of books. Die mad, Guardian.


THEY DO READ THEM, YOU JUDGY, RACOON-PICKED TRASH BIN


If you come for Bookstagram, i will fight you.

In appreciation, here are some of my favourite bookstagrams of my books: (photos by lit_nerd37, mybookacademy, bookswrotemystory, and scorpio_books)