Health in Europe starts 2021 by going global! Join us for a panel discussion on the new EU health policy special issue of @JHPPL and "European" health care! 12pm (UK) Weds 13 Jan 2021 - [email protected] for info/access. (1/8)

Professor Katherine Fierlbeck @kfierlbeck (2/8)
https://t.co/ZhLbUZDXe1
Dr Tomislav Sokol @TomislavSokol (3/8)
https://t.co/jVQo6WfI9H
Dr Eleanor Brooks @Ellie_Brooks (4/8)
https://t.co/aw3IRSJcRy
Professor Tamara Hervey @TamaraHervey (5/8)
https://t.co/sgU6eCmvh0
Dr Olga Löblová @olgaloblova (6/8)
https://t.co/xgAMruuXMh
Professor Dorte Sindbjerg Martinsen and Dr Reini Schrama @dm_martinsen (7/8)
https://t.co/aK8sVfjVc7
Dr Bruno Nikolič (8/8)
https://t.co/brrhQh4iWH
@threadreaderapp unroll

More from Health

You May Also Like

"I lied about my basic beliefs in order to keep a prestigious job. Now that it will be zero-cost to me, I have a few things to say."


We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.

Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)

It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.

Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".