@janethooton_ @ErinInTheMorn @fifi_EY 1/ The 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 government decided pediatric gender care in England would be a monopoly contract (a Labour minister, in 2008), despite all other NHS patients officially being entitled to a choice of providers, & second opinions on diagnoses & treatment, & gave it to GIDS, which has…

@73inlancs @janethooton_ @ErinInTheMorn @fifi_EY 2/…always advocated that trans minors & their families must have no alternative source of care, & subsequent Tory ministers have personally put their signature on renewals of it, and even personally rejected proposals for improvement that have been put forward by NHS England…
@73inlancs @janethooton_ @ErinInTheMorn @fifi_EY 3/…as a result of wider & public consultation. They & their civil servants listen only to GIDS on trans minors - it was GIDS advised against <18s being allowed #GenderRecognition in 2004, & since, on the basis that no one under 18 can be certain of their gender identity, just…
@73inlancs @janethooton_ @ErinInTheMorn @fifi_EY 4/…as many other staff at their trust wrote⬇️ to the press in 2002 (when the first instigator of this case, psychoanalyst Susan Evans was on staff too) that no trans people should be allowed that recognition but needed therapy…
https://t.co/JFD5efyEoq
@73inlancs @janethooton_ @ErinInTheMorn @fifi_EY 5/…to "cure" us instead. Yet GIDS proved incapable of defending its super-conservative protocol in court - no doubt because GIDS has always expected challenges to be from patients seeking care more like that elsewhere, arrogantly ignoring that services in countries where the…
@73inlancs @janethooton_ @ErinInTheMorn @fifi_EY 6/…challengers in this case have been operating in the past knew that only their approach was defensible from that direction, & worked with their patients rather than attempting conversion therapy by delay & frustration & ignoring #UNCRC, children's rights, not least to…
@73inlancs @janethooton_ @ErinInTheMorn @fifi_EY 7/…bodily autonomy. It is also on the English government that NHS England, despite being a co-defendant, wasn't in court, leaving no one there to speak for other vital services that rely upon the Gillick principles (which GIDS misuse since they deny parents the right to…
@73inlancs @janethooton_ @ErinInTheMorn @fifi_EY 8/…consent whereas Gillick is only supposed to be used when an <16yo refuses to involve their parents or parents disagree with the patient) in order to care for some of their patients. Could they not see the potential threat despite the lawyer acting for the claimants having…
@73inlancs @janethooton_ @ErinInTheMorn @fifi_EY 9/…a long history of anti-abortion & birth control cases & those backing his cases trying very publicly to use trans minors' care as a wedge issue in the US & elsewhere, or is the current English government - whose ideological backing largely comes from US think-tanks that…
@73inlancs @janethooton_ @ErinInTheMorn @fifi_EY 10/…are strongly anti-LGBT, anti-abortion, anti-birth control, anti-women's bodily autonomy generally, anti-NHS & anti-EU - secretly intending to travel in that direction too, after trans minors' care has been used as a wedge issue to open the way.

And was it down to 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿…
@73inlancs @janethooton_ @ErinInTheMorn @fifi_EY 11/…government pressure that the 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Children's Commissioner, legally responsible for protecting UNCRC rights, wasn't in court to speak up? Why does that government-appointed official choose to never speak up on the rights of trans minors under that UN convention, & under…
@73inlancs @janethooton_ @ErinInTheMorn @fifi_EY 12/… EA2010, even when a threat to them is a clear threat to other minors too, & the UN oversight committee for that convention has been specific that trans minors are included in its protections, if anyone ever had any doubt?

Yes, the 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 government is very much guilty on this.
@73inlancs @janethooton_ @ErinInTheMorn @fifi_EY 13/ And of course this ruling is oddly identical to the threat made by the Equalities Minister shortly after she'd met with The Heritage Foundation, whose ex-staffer serving in the Trump Dept HHS was attempting in court to have all protection for US trans healthcare removed 🤔
@73inlancs @janethooton_ @ErinInTheMorn @fifi_EY cc @threadreaderapp unroll SVP

More from Health

Thread on how atheism leads to mental retardation (backed with medical citations🧵💉)

To start with, atheism is an unnatural self-contradicting doctrine.

Medical terminology proves that human beings are naturally pre-disposed to believe in God. Oxford scientists assert that people are "born believers".

https://t.co/kE0Fi588yn
https://t.co/OqyXcGIMJn


It should be known that atheism could never produce an intelligently-functioning society and neither ever will.

Contrastingly, Islam produced several intellectuals & polymaths, was on the forefront of scientific development, boasting 100% literacy


It is also scientifically proven that atheism led to lesser scientific curiosity and scientific frauds, which is also why atheists incline to pseudo-science.

Whereas, religion in general and Islam in particular boosted education.

https://t.co/19Onc84u3g


Atheists are also likely to affected by pervasive mental and developmental disorders like high-functioning autism.

Cognitive Scientists and renowned Neurologists found that more atheism is leads to greater autism.

https://t.co/zRjEyFoX3P
You gotta think about this one carefully!

Imagine you go to the doctor and get tested for a rare disease (only 1 in 10,000 people get it.)

The test is 99% effective in detecting both sick and healthy people.

Your test comes back positive.

Are you really sick? Explain below 👇

The most complete answer from every reply so far is from Dr. Lena. Thanks for taking the time and going through


You can get the answer using Bayes' theorem, but let's try to come up with it in a different —maybe more intuitive— way.

👇


Here is what we know:

- Out of 10,000 people, 1 is sick
- Out of 100 sick people, 99 test positive
- Out of 100 healthy people, 99 test negative

Assuming 1 million people take the test (including you):

- 100 of them are sick
- 999,900 of them are healthy

👇

Let's now test both groups, starting with the 100 people sick:

▫️ 99 of them will be diagnosed (correctly) as sick (99%)

▫️ 1 of them is going to be diagnosed (incorrectly) as healthy (1%)

👇

You May Also Like

क्या आप जानते हैं कि क्या है, पितृ पक्ष में कौवे को खाना देने के पीछे का वैज्ञानिक कारण!

श्राद्ध पक्ष में कौओं का बड़ा ही महत्व है। कहते है कौआ यम का प्रतीक है, यदि आपके हाथों दिया गया भोजन ग्रहण कर ले, तो ऐसा माना जाता है कि पितरों की कृपा आपके ऊपर है और वे आपसे ख़ुश है।


कुछ लोग कहते हैं की व्यक्ति मरकर सबसे पहले कौवे के रूप में जन्म लेता है और उसे खाना खिलाने से वह भोजन पितरों को मिलता है

शायद हम सबने अपने घर के किसी बड़े बुज़ुर्ग, किसी पंडित या ज्योतिषाचार्य से ये सुना होगा। वे अनगिनत किस्से सुनाएंगे, कहेंगे बड़े बुज़ुर्ग कह गए इसीलिए ऐसा करना

शायद ही हमें कोई इसके पीछे का वैज्ञानिक कारण बता सके।

हमारे ऋषि मुनि और पौराणिक काल में रहने वाले लोग मुर्ख नहीं थे! कभी सोचियेगा कौवों को पितृ पक्ष में खिलाई खीर हमारे पूर्वजों तक कैसे पहुंचेगी?

हमारे ऋषि मुनि विद्वान थे, वे जो बात करते या कहते थे उसके पीछे कोई न कोई वैज्ञानिक कारण छुपा होता था।

एक बहुत रोचक तथ्य है पितृ पक्ष, भादो( भाद्रपद) प्रकृति और काक के बीच।

एक बात जो कह सकते कि हम सब ने स्वतः उग आये पीपल या बरगद का पेड़/ पौधा किसी न किसी दीवार, पुरानी

इमारत, पर्वत या अट्टालिकाओं पर ज़रूर देखा होगा। देखा है न?

ज़रा सोचिये पीपल या बरगद की बीज कैसे पहुंचे होंगे वहाँ तक? इनके बीज इतने हल्के भी नहीं होते के हवा उन्हें उड़ाके ले जा सके।