Thread on how atheism leads to mental retardation (backed with medical citations🧵💉)

To start with, atheism is an unnatural self-contradicting doctrine.

Medical terminology proves that human beings are naturally pre-disposed to believe in God. Oxford scientists assert that people are "born believers".

https://t.co/kE0Fi588yn
https://t.co/OqyXcGIMJn
It should be known that atheism could never produce an intelligently-functioning society and neither ever will.

Contrastingly, Islam produced several intellectuals & polymaths, was on the forefront of scientific development, boasting 100% literacy rates.

https://t.co/IHixP6D5AU
It is also scientifically proven that atheism led to lesser scientific curiosity and scientific frauds, which is also why atheists incline to pseudo-science.

Whereas, religion in general and Islam in particular boosted education.

https://t.co/19Onc84u3g
Atheists are also likely to affected by pervasive mental and developmental disorders like high-functioning autism.

Cognitive Scientists and renowned Neurologists found that more atheism is leads to greater autism.

https://t.co/zRjEyFoX3P
Highly intelligent people tend to be open-minded and have scientific curiosity.

Whereas, research indicated that atheists tend to be less open-minded and show greater intolerance to contradiction when their beliefs are challenged.

https://t.co/KRZNldiE8B
Religion also has neuroanatomical effects like thicker cerebral cortices & a greater ability to fight depression.

Atheism on the other hand has the highest suicide rates, a direct result of poor mental welfare.

https://t.co/YBk7VBgDQ6
Atheism also leads to lower IQs, a survey found that people who practice their religion by visiting religious institutions on a regular basis, tend to have higher IQs than atheists/irreligious people.

Source: Theodre Beale, General Social Survey (1972-2012)
Atheism also leads to an extremely low Emotional Quotient (EQ).

Atheists have a higher rate of having emotional problems when they disbelieve in God, whereas religiosity is positively associated with emotional intelligence.

https://t.co/L7hYG9UyOY
https://t.co/xehjeJ9Tmm
Atheists are also more likely to be evil psychopaths & criminals.

Science tells us that atheism is positively related to criminal traits which is why most of the mass-murderers historically were atheists.

https://t.co/vRTCth1ja9
Moreover, mental issues is a natural product of atheism.

Believing in God leads to better mental health. While countries like China (world's largest atheistic society) faces the highest number of Alzheimer's & Dementia cases.

https://t.co/UcflNU67Su
https://t.co/0obLKzsA5h
While religious beliefs have logical explanations using logical propositions, atheism has no rationale (is an acquired blunder as (i) explains)

Moreover, atheists are much more likely to believe in pseudo-science and superstition.

https://t.co/fDWo9jlmhV
https://t.co/kNfSI8DJZg
And what will be the fate of atheism?

Scientifically atheism will never survive, because they’re at a biological disadvantage.

In contrast, Islam will outshine other religions, whereas atheism is bound to extinct.
https://t.co/jYFp1vhmA6
https://t.co/tXUSkGPi5i

🧵

More from Health

🚨Important changes to lockdown/self-isolation regulations from 5pm

The Health Protection (Coronavirus, Restrictions) (All Tiers and Self-Isolation) (England) (Amendment) Regulations 2021

£800 'house party' FPN & police can now access track & trace data

https://t.co/k9XCpVsXhC


“Large gathering offence”

As trailed by Home Secretary last week there is now a fixed penalty notice of £800 (or £400 if you pay within 14 days) for participating in an gathering of over 15 people in a private residence


Fixed Penalty Notices double for each subsequent “large gathering offence” up to £6,400

Compare:
- Ordinary fixed penalty notice is £200 or £100 if paid in 14 days
- Holding or being involved in the holding of a gathering of over 30 people is £10,000


Second big change:

Since September has been a legal requirement to sell-isolate if you test positive/notified by Track & Trace of exposure to someone else who tested positive

Police can now be given access to NHS Track & Trace data if for the purpose of enforcement/prosecution


This will make it easier for police to enforce people breaking self-isolation rules. Currently there has been practically no enforcement.

Data says only a small proportion of people meant to be self-isolating are fully doing so.
Some thoughts on this: Firstly, it might be personal preference, but I am not keen on this kind of campaign as I feel like it trivialises cancer. Sometimes the serious message gets lost because people are sharing pics of cats or whatever and the important context is gone.


More importantly, the statistic being used in the campaign is misleading. It says 57% of women put off cervical screening if they can't get waxed. But on further investigation, that's not accurate.

The page here goes on to say "57% of women who regularly have their pubic hair professionally removed would put off attending their cervical screening appointment if they hadn’t been able to visit a beauty salon."

So the 57% represents a concern not across the whole population of women, but only those who regularly get waxed. So how big of an issue is this across the whole population? And what else is stopping people getting smears?

I think campaigns for cancer screening are really tricky because there is so much nuance that often doesn't fit into a catchy headline or hashtag. It's certainly not easy and is part of a bigger conversation.

You May Also Like

The UN just voted to condemn Israel 9 times, and the rest of the world 0.

View the resolutions and voting results here:

The resolution titled "The occupied Syrian Golan," which condemns Israel for "repressive measures" against Syrian citizens in the Golan Heights, was adopted by a vote of 151 - 2 - 14.

Israel and the U.S. voted 'No'
https://t.co/HoO7oz0dwr


The resolution titled "Israeli practices affecting the human rights of the Palestinian people..." was adopted by a vote of 153 - 6 - 9.

Australia, Canada, Israel, Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and the U.S. voted 'No' https://t.co/1Ntpi7Vqab


The resolution titled "Israeli settlements in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, and the occupied Syrian Golan" was adopted by a vote of 153 – 5 – 10.

Canada, Israel, Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and the U.S. voted 'No'
https://t.co/REumYgyRuF


The resolution titled "Applicability of the Geneva Convention... to the
Occupied Palestinian Territory..." was adopted by a vote of 154 - 5 - 8.

Canada, Israel, Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and the U.S. voted 'No'
https://t.co/xDAeS9K1kW