With the news that a dozen Republican senators plan to be openly hostile to #democracy on Jan. 6, and the understandable frenzy on social & the media about this, I want to be clear about 3 things:

1. Their stunt on Jan. 6 will fail. What happens after objections are raised to a state's slate of electors in both the House and the Senate, is that they each have to debate the issue and then vote. It can't take more than 2 hours.
The House has a Democratic majority, so there's zero chance that a state's electors will get thrown out. (Both the House and the Senate have to agree.) All this is, is political theatre and as such, it'll get a lot of attention and make Trump happy.
You don't have to take my word on this. Read @Teri_Kanefield's explainer here: https://t.co/wKLbeJoabx
2. So the obvious question is, if this stunt is doomed to fail, why in the world are these Republicans doing this?

Contrary to what this looks like, it's not about their fealty to Trump.
Ironically, it's about their OWN election hopes. The House Republicans who plan to object come from very red districts. They're worried about a primary from someone even more right-wing than they are in 2022. This vote is about shoring up the MAGA faithful vote.
The list of Senators who will object, including Hawley, are already on the list as potential 2024 presidential candidates (or are looking at a governor's seat.) Just wait for the avalanche of fundraising emails once they do this.
So, yes, it's deeply ironic that these Republicans are undermining a bedrock of our democracy -- free and fair elections and a peaceful transfer of power -- in order to get elected themselves.
3. My final point. Just because this is doomed to fail, and is only about their own re-election hopes, doesn't mean that this stunt isn't deeply, deeply damaging to our country.
Neither Trump nor the Republicans have a shred of evidence of voter fraud or irregularities with this election. No court, even up to SCOTUS, has agreed with any of their allegations. (Thank you, @marceelias)
What this is, is proof that @davidfrum was right all along when a few years ago he predicted this:

“If conservatives become convinced that they can not win democratically, they will not abandon conservatism. The will reject democracy.”
And so, while I want you to not worry about what will happen on Jan. 6, we need to have our eyes WIDE OPEN as to who these Republicans are: enemies of democracy.

I hope you will join me in pledging to protect our democracy, in every possible way, in the coming years.
#SeditionHasConsequences #SeditiousGOP

More from Government

You May Also Like

I hate when I learn something new (to me) & stunning about the Jeff Epstein network (h/t MoodyKnowsNada.)

Where to begin?

So our new Secretary of State Anthony Blinken's stepfather, Samuel Pisar, was "longtime lawyer and confidant of...Robert Maxwell," Ghislaine Maxwell's Dad.


"Pisar was one of the last people to speak to Maxwell, by phone, probably an hour before the chairman of Mirror Group Newspapers fell off his luxury yacht the Lady Ghislaine on 5 November, 1991."
https://t.co/DAEgchNyTP


OK, so that's just a coincidence. Moving on, Anthony Blinken "attended the prestigious Dalton School in New York City"...wait, what? https://t.co/DnE6AvHmJg

Dalton School...Dalton School...rings a

Oh that's right.

The dad of the U.S. Attorney General under both George W. Bush & Donald Trump, William Barr, was headmaster of the Dalton School.

Donald Barr was also quite a


I'm not going to even mention that Blinken's stepdad Sam Pisar's name was in Epstein's "black book."

Lots of names in that book. I mean, for example, Cuomo, Trump, Clinton, Prince Andrew, Bill Cosby, Woody Allen - all in that book, and their reputations are spotless.
Ivor Cummins has been wrong (or lying) almost entirely throughout this pandemic and got paid handsomly for it.

He has been wrong (or lying) so often that it will be nearly impossible for me to track every grift, lie, deceit, manipulation he has pulled. I will use...


... other sources who have been trying to shine on light on this grifter (as I have tried to do, time and again:


Example #1: "Still not seeing Sweden signal versus Denmark really"... There it was (Images attached).
19 to 80 is an over 300% difference.

Tweet: https://t.co/36FnYnsRT9


Example #2 - "Yes, I'm comparing the Noridcs / No, you cannot compare the Nordics."

I wonder why...

Tweets: https://t.co/XLfoX4rpck / https://t.co/vjE1ctLU5x


Example #3 - "I'm only looking at what makes the data fit in my favour" a.k.a moving the goalposts.

Tweets: https://t.co/vcDpTu3qyj / https://t.co/CA3N6hC2Lq