🧵 So today we’ve got the Government’s vision for online harms legislation. It’s a landmark day for all of us who’ve worked for this for years. Some quick early (personal!) thoughts:

This is a systemic Duty of Care, with a requirement to risk assess - regularly - for reasonable foreseeable harms and to act on them. Supported by Codes but that serve as guardrails, not a prescriptive checklist
There’s a broad requirement on all services to tackle illegal content and to take measures to protect children. Worried that age assurance may be expected to do a lot of heavy lifting instead of proper moderation for legal but harmful, but we’ll see
The biggest weakness: enforcement measures. Criminal sanctions & named persons have deference value - that’s why industry pushed back strongly. But not for at least 2 years and even then only covering failure to comply with the regulator. If Govt thinks this is really enough...
Investigatory powers are OK (particularly pleased to see the inclusion of skilled persons reviews 😉). But the balance between investigatory powers and duties isn’t where it needs to be to drive culture change
It’s a bold and necessary step to have encryption and private messaging services in scope. It reflects the threat vectors for CSA, and regulation wouldn’t appropriately tackle child harms otherwise
An intriguing reference to Ofcom co-designating regulatory powers 🤔 But otherwise the Govt approach to user advocacy - leave it to Ofcom, without creating a funded user advocacy body - isn’t a level playing field and needs tightening in the Bill
There’s a MASSIVE gap around arrangements for platforms to tackle the cross-platform nature of risks, and to address material which facilitates CSAM. Regulator needs an approach that recognises the harm ecosystem and adopts an approach earlier in the abuse pipeline
This is an approach which rightly majors on children, but it arguably should have a broader focus for societal harms. We’re getting a real time lesson in disinformation, with the failure of platforms to moderate antivax an emerging and obvious public health risk
Is this world leading? We’ll see the #DSA later today. And on the surface, it has weaker enforcement powers than Ireland. But it’s still an important package, and there’s lots to fight for in the months ahead
One final thought: big shout out to some wonderful people that have worked tirelessly on this in past or current lives: @martha_kirby1 @_rosyrosyrosy @ga_hill @RuschenHannah @CharCallear. Heroes don’t always wear capes, but if you see them, you definitely owe them a pint

More from Government

Parents in cities, please pay attention to the reopening details from the Whitehouse.

Biden says "small classes". What we need to understand is how they plant to accomplish this.

Through "childcare programs in schools". We see this all over states w/ closed schools.


We need to grasp that the AFT, NEA, & local unions are systematically working to decouple education from childcare.

Their vision is your child sitting on a device all day, watched by a childcare worker, being "taught" from a Teacher working from

This isn't a paranoid conspiracy theory - it is already happening in the majority of districts across the US where schools are closed.

"Learning Hubs" open, supervised by childcare workers, sometimes in the same "unsafe" school

There is NO OTHER WAY to get "small classes" without Hybrid + wraparound childcare. Your child will spend 2-3 days per WEEK supervised by low wage workers and sitting on a laptop.

Here's

Fairfax,

You May Also Like