Your Higher SELF is orchestrating and managing many energy downloads and integrations of High vibrational LIGHT CODES into your Physical, Mental, Emotional and Etheric bodies.
Asara Adams
ENERGY UPDATE BY THE PLEIADIAN-SIRIAN – ARCTURIAN COUNCIL OF LIGHT ~ November 22, 2020
“We are Here NOW.
We LOVE you.
We are you, from your future, to assist you on your path.

Your Higher SELF is orchestrating and managing many energy downloads and integrations of High vibrational LIGHT CODES into your Physical, Mental, Emotional and Etheric bodies.
You are Evolving into a NEW HUman.
Now, any response that is less than LOVE feels very uncomfortable for many of you.
When this happens you have the opportunity to make different choices to align your SELF with the HIGHER vibrational experience.
Sometimes, this involves making changes in your life.
That’s when things are less in the flow in different areas of your life…
Embrace the Change within your SELF…
Embrace that you are BEcoming a NEW person…
Embrace that you are BEcoming more Heart centered…
Soon, the veil will drop and you will be able to perceive the Higher Dimensions and all Higher Realms.
Soon, you will be able to Enter these Higher Realms, as you are Shifting and ...
We are holding the vision of the New Earth with you and from our vantage point it is Glorious.
We are with you, every step of the way.
You are Loved beyond measure.
We are with you, every step of the way.
You are Loved beyond measure.
We are with you… Always. We LOVE You.
WE are YOU.
Namaste.”
More from Fun
You May Also Like
This is a pretty valiant attempt to defend the "Feminist Glaciology" article, which says conventional wisdom is wrong, and this is a solid piece of scholarship. I'll beg to differ, because I think Jeffery, here, is confusing scholarship with "saying things that seem right".
The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.
Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)
There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.
At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?
Imagine for a moment the most obscurantist, jargon-filled, po-mo article the politically correct academy might produce. Pure SJW nonsense. Got it? Chances are you're imagining something like the infamous "Feminist Glaciology" article from a few years back.https://t.co/NRaWNREBvR pic.twitter.com/qtSFBYY80S
— Jeffrey Sachs (@JeffreyASachs) October 13, 2018
The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.

Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)

There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.

At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?