WHY IS GOLD SO PRECIOUS.?
Some have answered partially right
Will Try to Explain Both MODERN and ANCIENT Reasons.
Please READ Slowly ( #Thread )
MODERN REASON👇🏻
Only Few Can Answer the 3 Questions
1 Why is Gold a Precious Metal ?
2 Why Planets Spin and Never Stop?
3 Is so called Space-Time Fabric Real?
WHY IS GOLD SO PRECIOUS.?
Some have answered partially right
Will Try to Explain Both MODERN and ANCIENT Reasons.
Please READ Slowly ( #Thread )
MODERN REASON👇🏻
Gold VALUABLE in Sanatan Dharma.
MOBILE PHONES have 0.034gms of Gold used as connectors in circuits as it is the highest Conducting Material of electromagnentic waves &Cosmic Energies.
1. HINDU IDOLS and CHILDREN
Children and GOLD
Refer Tweet Below
https://t.co/FYkj0nx2FZ
https://t.co/7uKUoRrQTI
To Check More on
WOMEN and Gold
Refer Below Tweet
https://t.co/8ed87ltbD4
10/n #SAMASKAR - 4 ::JaatKaram (\u091c\u093e\u0924\u0915\u0930\u094d\u092e)
— RapperPandit \u2197\ufe0f \u0d07\u0d28\u0d4d\u0d24\u0d4d\u0d2f4\u0d15\u0d36\u0d4d\u0d2e\u0d40\u0d7c (@RapperPandit) May 12, 2020
IMP: Cleansing Baby & Prepare for-Rooting/Sucking+Breathing/Swallowing & Hearing
Purpose: Prepare Child before Breast Feeding, HOROSCOPE, WHISPERING Secret Name
What: Honey+Ghee fed with Gold spoon
When:On the Birth of the Child pic.twitter.com/12iJ0CpJnP
WHY PLANETS ROTATE
Mother Earth is a LIVING ENTITY.
1. Active Core and Magnetic Aura
2. 24hr rotational cycle
3. RichSoil that Gives& supports life like a Mother
4. DirectionalRivers & DirectionalOcean Currents GLOBAL CONVEYER BELT.
5. 70% water like our Body
Planets like Earth have Magnetic Core
Rotation of Magnet creates Electromagnetic Aura .Cooling of this Magnetic Core will Stop this Electromagnetic Aura which Protects Our Earth from Harmful Radiations
As per Western Science Preservation of Momentum ie formation of Solid Planets from rotating Gaseous entities.
HASNT BEEN ABLE TO EXPLAIN
VENUS AntiClockwise hence worshipped for Feminine Energies-Shukracharya derived from it
Rotation Of Planets Been Started by SHAKTI (FORCE)
Will Stop When the Kalpa Ends and Solar System Ends
To Know More About EARTH AS MOTHER SCIENTIFICALLY and KALPA and Annihilation Check this Thread.
https://t.co/eIPRwjk9qT
14/n SOIL is to EARTH What WOMB is to MOTHER !
— RapperPandit \u2197\ufe0f \u0d07\u0d28\u0d4d\u0d24\u0d4d\u0d2f4\u0d15\u0d36\u0d4d\u0d2e\u0d40\u0d7c (@RapperPandit) June 9, 2020
-Fluid in Amniotic Sac of WOMB: The Foetus in Womb grows due to Fluid which is Water& Electrolytes; by the 12-14th week also contains Proteins, Carbohydrates, Lipids & Phospholipids & Urea
-SOIL Contains All of These (Like MOTHER) pic.twitter.com/eXksqbMjOD
Read this
https://t.co/Ugnsz9EAis
4/n Vedic Astrology considers 9 \u0917\u0943\u0939 .
— RapperPandit \u2197\ufe0f \u0d07\u0d28\u0d4d\u0d24\u0d4d\u0d2f4\u0d15\u0d36\u0d4d\u0d2e\u0d40\u0d7c (@RapperPandit) September 13, 2020
Not Same as planets, but bodies/motions that have impact on Human Life and Events on Earth
SUN \u0930\u0935\u093f
MOON \u0938\u094b\u092e
MARS \u092e\u0902\u0917\u0932
MERCURY \u092c\u0941\u0927
JUPITER \u092c\u094d\u0930\u0939\u0938\u094d\u092a\u0924
VENUS \u0936\u0941\u0915\u094d\u0930
SATURN \u0936\u0928\u093f
RAHU (Point of Crossing Ecliptic)
KETU (180deg opposite Rahu)
What HOLDS PLANETS in A Perfect Elliptic Plane around sun..Means No Up Down, But Just Like in 1 Pane like Plate.
Read this Thread 👇🏻 to Know About SPACE TIME
https://t.co/Y2PGlxkW2F
Question: Where is East?
— RapperPandit \u2197\ufe0f \u0d07\u0d28\u0d4d\u0d24\u0d4d\u0d2f4\u0d15\u0d36\u0d4d\u0d2e\u0d40\u0d7c (@RapperPandit) September 14, 2020
Answer: Oh! Just look at the Sun !
Now, Imagine, You Landed at Sun,
Then where is East?
Let's Explore '\u0926\u093f\u0915\u094d' \u0906\u092f\u093e\u092e (heard \u0926\u093f\u0917\u094d\u0935\u093f\u091c\u092f)
& Truth of Space-Time #Thread pic.twitter.com/tZx0NsdbBO
More from RapperPandit ↗️ ഇന്ത്യ4കശ്മീർ
More from For later read
I should mention, this is why I keep talking about this. Because I know so many people who legally CAN'T.
How do I know they have NDAs, if they can't talk legally about them? Because they trusted me with their secrets... after I said something. That's how they knew I was safe.
Some of the people who have reached out to me privately have been sitting with the pain of what happened to them and the regret that they signed for YEARS. But at the time, it didn't seem like they had any other option BUT to sign.
I do not blame *anyone* for signing an NDA, especially when it's attached to a financial lifeline. When you feel like your family's wellbeing is at stake, you'll do anything -- even sign away your own voice -- to provide for them. That's not a "choice"; that's survival.
And yes, many of the people whose stories I now know were pressured into signing an NDA by my husband's ex-employer. Some of whom I *never* would have guessed. People I thought "left well." Turns out, they've just been *very* good at abiding by the terms of their NDA.
(And others who have reached out had similar experiences with other Christian orgs. Turns out abuse, and the use of NDAs to cover up that abuse, is rampant in a LOT of places.)
How do I know they have NDAs, if they can't talk legally about them? Because they trusted me with their secrets... after I said something. That's how they knew I was safe.
And if the environment at the org was toxic or abusive, it is not uncommon to not realize the extent of that toxicity/abuse until after you're out. But by the time you realize that you signed under duress and presumed good faith where none existed, you're out of options.
— Lauren Thoman (@LaurenThoman) February 16, 2021
Some of the people who have reached out to me privately have been sitting with the pain of what happened to them and the regret that they signed for YEARS. But at the time, it didn't seem like they had any other option BUT to sign.
I do not blame *anyone* for signing an NDA, especially when it's attached to a financial lifeline. When you feel like your family's wellbeing is at stake, you'll do anything -- even sign away your own voice -- to provide for them. That's not a "choice"; that's survival.
And yes, many of the people whose stories I now know were pressured into signing an NDA by my husband's ex-employer. Some of whom I *never* would have guessed. People I thought "left well." Turns out, they've just been *very* good at abiding by the terms of their NDA.
(And others who have reached out had similar experiences with other Christian orgs. Turns out abuse, and the use of NDAs to cover up that abuse, is rampant in a LOT of places.)
You May Also Like
I just finished Eric Adler's The Battle of the Classics, and wanted to say something about Joel Christiansen's review linked below. I am not sure what motivates the review (I speculate a bit below), but it gives a very misleading impression of the book. 1/x
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x
As someone\u2019s who\u2019s read the book, this review strikes me as tremendously unfair. It mostly faults Adler for not writing the book the reviewer wishes he had! https://t.co/pqpt5Ziivj
— Teresa M. Bejan (@tmbejan) January 12, 2021
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x
