Your networks will become more personally meaningful and influential in your life.
— Jack Murphy \U0001f1fa\U0001f1f8 \u2694\ufe0f (@jackmurphylive) December 24, 2020
They will educate you and protect you and give you meaning in a way that today\u2019s institutions can not.
Networks will replace institutions.
Our institutions are failing.
You need a strong network to survive.
The #LiminalOrder is the fastest growing all men's network in the country.
Are you ready to become happier, healthier, + wealthier?
Tomorrow is your chance.
Step 1: join the list.
https://t.co/IFoLVqX2DA
Themes in 2021:
— Jack Murphy \U0001f1fa\U0001f1f8 \u2694\ufe0f (@jackmurphylive) December 28, 2020
- homesteading
- info homesteading
- strategic disconnection
- info militias
- off bad grids
- on good grids
- sovereignty
- masculinity
- brotherhood
- network calibration
- networks over institutions
Our institutions are captured and failing.
— Jack Murphy \U0001f1fa\U0001f1f8 \u2694\ufe0f (@jackmurphylive) December 29, 2020
You must rely on your network for survival.
If you don\u2019t have a network...
You better find one.
Universities
— Jack Murphy \U0001f1fa\U0001f1f8 \u2694\ufe0f (@jackmurphylive) December 29, 2020
Public health
Media
K-12 education
Mental health
Science
Government
Tech
Media
All captured.
All corrupted.
All condemned.
These institutions used to keep you safe.
Now they harm you.
And it will get worse \U0001f4af
Solution?
Networks.
May you find yours now.
Emergent networks will become more powerful than the old line institutions. It is the way. https://t.co/FWSqQixX1F
— Jack Murphy \U0001f1fa\U0001f1f8 \u2694\ufe0f (@jackmurphylive) December 24, 2020
Institutions have been captured.
— Jack Murphy \U0001f1fa\U0001f1f8 \u2694\ufe0f (@jackmurphylive) December 19, 2020
Networks must become more powerful.
This is the way.
We counted on our elites to process information and make decisions for us.
— Jack Murphy \U0001f1fa\U0001f1f8 \u2694\ufe0f (@jackmurphylive) April 3, 2020
They failed us.
They will continue to fail us.
The world is too complex. Our institutions too rigid. The process of reorienting on the fly is too slow.
We make bad decisions and stick with them.
The era of indiscriminate connection is over.
— Jack Murphy \U0001f1fa\U0001f1f8 \u2694\ufe0f (@jackmurphylive) April 3, 2020
The tide turns towards strategic disconnection.
We don\u2019t need to be connected to everything. Not every thing needs to go every place. And not every idea needs a free pass into your brain.
Curation now trumps connection.
More from For later read
@KevinCoates correct me if I'm wrong, but basic point seems to be that banning targeted ads will lower platform profits, but will mostly be beneficial for consumers.
Some counterpoints 👇
That targeted ads allow for "free" products for consumers is a common talking point and we're going to see more of it in the coming months.: https://t.co/Xty3My3f0u (1/14)
— Kevin Coates (@KevinCoates) February 16, 2021
1) This assumes that consumers prefer contextual ads to targeted ones.
This does not seem self-evident to me
Great post by @Sherman1890 got me thinking about the future of targeted ads.
— Dirk Auer (@AuerDirk) February 12, 2021
More and more tools (privacy labels, ad blockers, GDPR) enable consumers to opt-out from targeted ads - can limit the data platforms receive or block ads altogether.
The end of targeted ads? \U0001f9f5\U0001f447 https://t.co/MA6A3BrUWq
Research also finds that firms choose between ad. targeting vs. obtrusiveness 👇
If true, the right question is not whether consumers prefer contextual ads to targeted ones. But whether they prefer *more* contextual ads vs *fewer* targeted
2) True, many inframarginal platforms might simply shift to contextual ads.
But some might already be almost indifferent between direct & indirect monetization.
Hard to imagine that *none* of them will respond to reduced ad revenue with actual fees.
3) Policy debate seems to be moving from:
"Consumers are insufficiently informed to decide how they share their data."
To
"No one in their right mind would agree to highly targeted ads (e.g., those that mix data from multiple sources)."
IMO the latter statement is incorrect.
You May Also Like
He has been wrong (or lying) so often that it will be nearly impossible for me to track every grift, lie, deceit, manipulation he has pulled. I will use...
... other sources who have been trying to shine on light on this grifter (as I have tried to do, time and again:
Ivor Cummins BE (Chem) is a former R&D Manager at HP (sourcre: https://t.co/Wbf5scf7gn), turned Content Creator/Podcast Host/YouTube personality. (Call it what you will.)
— Steve (@braidedmanga) November 17, 2020
Example #1: "Still not seeing Sweden signal versus Denmark really"... There it was (Images attached).
19 to 80 is an over 300% difference.
Tweet: https://t.co/36FnYnsRT9
Example #2 - "Yes, I'm comparing the Noridcs / No, you cannot compare the Nordics."
I wonder why...
Tweets: https://t.co/XLfoX4rpck / https://t.co/vjE1ctLU5x
Example #3 - "I'm only looking at what makes the data fit in my favour" a.k.a moving the goalposts.
Tweets: https://t.co/vcDpTu3qyj / https://t.co/CA3N6hC2Lq