Your networks will become more personally meaningful and influential in your life.
— Jack Murphy \U0001f1fa\U0001f1f8 \u2694\ufe0f (@jackmurphylive) December 24, 2020
They will educate you and protect you and give you meaning in a way that today\u2019s institutions can not.
Networks will replace institutions.
Our institutions are failing.
You need a strong network to survive.
The #LiminalOrder is the fastest growing all men's network in the country.
Are you ready to become happier, healthier, + wealthier?
Tomorrow is your chance.
Step 1: join the list.
https://t.co/IFoLVqX2DA
Themes in 2021:
— Jack Murphy \U0001f1fa\U0001f1f8 \u2694\ufe0f (@jackmurphylive) December 28, 2020
- homesteading
- info homesteading
- strategic disconnection
- info militias
- off bad grids
- on good grids
- sovereignty
- masculinity
- brotherhood
- network calibration
- networks over institutions
Our institutions are captured and failing.
— Jack Murphy \U0001f1fa\U0001f1f8 \u2694\ufe0f (@jackmurphylive) December 29, 2020
You must rely on your network for survival.
If you don\u2019t have a network...
You better find one.
Universities
— Jack Murphy \U0001f1fa\U0001f1f8 \u2694\ufe0f (@jackmurphylive) December 29, 2020
Public health
Media
K-12 education
Mental health
Science
Government
Tech
Media
All captured.
All corrupted.
All condemned.
These institutions used to keep you safe.
Now they harm you.
And it will get worse \U0001f4af
Solution?
Networks.
May you find yours now.
Emergent networks will become more powerful than the old line institutions. It is the way. https://t.co/FWSqQixX1F
— Jack Murphy \U0001f1fa\U0001f1f8 \u2694\ufe0f (@jackmurphylive) December 24, 2020
Institutions have been captured.
— Jack Murphy \U0001f1fa\U0001f1f8 \u2694\ufe0f (@jackmurphylive) December 19, 2020
Networks must become more powerful.
This is the way.
We counted on our elites to process information and make decisions for us.
— Jack Murphy \U0001f1fa\U0001f1f8 \u2694\ufe0f (@jackmurphylive) April 3, 2020
They failed us.
They will continue to fail us.
The world is too complex. Our institutions too rigid. The process of reorienting on the fly is too slow.
We make bad decisions and stick with them.
The era of indiscriminate connection is over.
— Jack Murphy \U0001f1fa\U0001f1f8 \u2694\ufe0f (@jackmurphylive) April 3, 2020
The tide turns towards strategic disconnection.
We don\u2019t need to be connected to everything. Not every thing needs to go every place. And not every idea needs a free pass into your brain.
Curation now trumps connection.
More from For later read
@Daoyu15 @lab_leak @walkaboutrick @ydeigin @Ayjchan @franciscodeasis @TheSeeker268 @angie_rasmussen
28. Before moving on to DARPA, let's look at DTRA:
— Billy Bostickson \U0001f3f4\U0001f441&\U0001f441 \U0001f193 (@BillyBostickson) July 31, 2020
A must read!
It is astonishing the number of pies they had their dirty little fingers poking into:
Note John Epstein and Kevin Olival from EcoHealth Alliance are key figures in DTRA:https://t.co/O4QwVWrm7m pic.twitter.com/cnNGZ7AApj
@Daoyu15 @lab_leak @walkaboutrick @ydeigin @Ayjchan @franciscodeasis @TheSeeker268 @angie_rasmussen
24. DTRA Network for Collection of Viruses
— Billy Bostickson \U0001f3f4\U0001f441&\U0001f441 \U0001f193 (@BillyBostickson) January 9, 2021
7. DTRA - Metabiota - One Health - Ecohealth
Bat Research Networks and Viral Surveillance: Gaps and Opportunities in Western Asia pic.twitter.com/SOqSSXF3pa
@Daoyu15 @lab_leak @walkaboutrick @ydeigin @Ayjchan @franciscodeasis @TheSeeker268 @angie_rasmussen
That is the key question
— Billy Bostickson \U0001f3f4\U0001f441&\U0001f441 \U0001f193 (@BillyBostickson) January 5, 2021
1. DARPA/DTRA use NGOs like Ecohealth or Metabiota to collect new pathogens
2. They are sent to US labs (Mailman, Rocky Mountain, Atlanta CDC, UNC, USAMRIID) for GOF work by Lipkin, Nichols, Rasmussen, Baric, Dension, Munster, etchttps://t.co/wqhHK7uZO6
@Daoyu15 @lab_leak @walkaboutrick @ydeigin @Ayjchan @franciscodeasis @TheSeeker268 @angie_rasmussen
1. I wonder why Dr. Angela Rasmussen is so so upset & full of almost palpable venom about a Hypothesis and a "What if" question by @nicholsonbaker8 in the @NYMag https://t.co/a6lxtJLpKR
— Billy Bostickson \U0001f3f4\U0001f441&\U0001f441 \U0001f193 (@BillyBostickson) January 5, 2021
Did I hear someone say "DARPA"?
Did I hear someone say "DTRA"?https://t.co/i27mpxJDw2 pic.twitter.com/x4X3QPnTMS
You May Also Like
Imagine for a moment the most obscurantist, jargon-filled, po-mo article the politically correct academy might produce. Pure SJW nonsense. Got it? Chances are you're imagining something like the infamous "Feminist Glaciology" article from a few years back.https://t.co/NRaWNREBvR pic.twitter.com/qtSFBYY80S
— Jeffrey Sachs (@JeffreyASachs) October 13, 2018
The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.
Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)
There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.
At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?