1/8
Remember KP Yohanan?
Man behind #Sabrimala & whose NGO ws exposed in recent IT crackdown?
KP cld be connected to "killing" of Malayali journo, SV Pradeep--a man who hd crossed swords with Kerala CM & every Political party.
I hope central agency @NIA_India is aware of it. https://t.co/DyplfAU0Zj

2/8
SV Pradeep hd exposed a huge racket-- which he called the COFFIN racket (shava petti racket in malayalam). He apparently hd proof that KP's organisations wr running 20-25 crematories, and that the bodies turned into ashes in these places, wr UNACCOUNTED for.
But y?
3/8
SV pradeep ws killed in a hit & run case, on 15th Dec 2020.
This journo hd locked horns with almost every POLITICAL party in Kerala. He ws known for being one of the most brusque journalists in Kerala.
Bt he hd hurt commies & KP the most, with his reports.
4/8
In this youtube report👇 of Pradeep he hd exposed KP Yohanan, bt this ws not the 1st time he hd reported on KP.
He hd been doing it since sometime.

So why wld one suspect KP when Pradeep hd myriads of enemies?

https://t.co/lZxrvZ6RxU
5/8 It ws the TIMING of his killing which makes one suspicious. He ws killed during the LOCAL body elections in Kerala. No POLITICAL party wld want to commit suicide by getting rid of a nemesis during elections or immediately after that-- not even the commies!!!
6/8
The COFFIN racket exposed by SV Pradeep shld not be ignored by the central agencies like @NIA_India.
Which dead bodies get cremated in the crematories run by KP and his org?
why are the dead bodies unaccounted for?

SV Pradeep's past reports on this need to be revisited.
7/8
The CCTV pictures of SV Pradeep, moments b4 he ws hit by a truck, and the bike which was following him needs to be investigated too.
Many publishing houses hv pointed out that the truck hit him with the intentions of bumping him off.
https://t.co/uXMehFDlze
8/8 The popular theory behind his death is commies hd a hand. I believe going by the exhilarated reactions of commie leaders on SM, they wr NOT directly involved. That leaves an organisation which suffered massive damage in reputation bcoz of him. No points for guessing!
Many associate the above case with Kerala GOLD smuggling case.
I won't go by it.
That theory is a mere distraction!
Oh! I forgot to mention a word that SV pradeep had mentioned in his report-- ORGAN transplantations and deaths associated with it.
The gist of the above thread. https://t.co/2aXXPxL6K5

More from For later read

1. The death of Silicon Valley, a thread

How did Silicon Valley die? It was killed by the internet. I will explain.

Yesterday, my friend IRL asked me "Where are good old days when techies were


2. In the "good old days" Silicon Valley was about understanding technology. Silicon, to be precise. These were people who had to understand quantum mechanics, who had to build the near-miraculous devices that we now take for granted, and they had to work

3. Now, I love libertarians, and I share much of their political philosophy. But you have to be socially naive to believe that it has a chance in a real society. In those days, Silicon Valley was not a real society. It was populated by people who understood quantum mechanics

4. Then came the microcomputer revolution. It was created by people who understood how to build computers. One borderline case was Steve Jobs. People claimed that Jobs was surrounded by a "reality distortion field" - that's how good he was at understanding people, not things

5. Still, the heroes of Silicon Valley were the engineers. The people who knew how to build things. Steve Jobs, for all his understanding of people, also had quite a good understanding of technology. He had a libertarian vibe, and so did Silicon Valley
the whole point of Dunks was you could go cop them at VIM whenever you wanted for $65. this shit is like having to enter a raffle to buy milk.


like seriously why not make a ton more of them if they're gonna be so sought-after? they land at outlets? so? nike still makes money off that.

the only reason to keep making them so limited is that they KNOW all that matters is the profit on the flip and if they were readily available FEWER people would want them, not more

the whole system is super broken, but it's just gonna go the way it goes, because at this point it all caters to the secondary market. the only reason Nike can sell Jordan 1s for $200 is because the people buying them can flip them for $500

adjusted for inflation, a $65 AJ1 in 1985 is like $160—and modern-day AJ1s are made from cheaper materials in factories staffed by cheaper workers. they don't HAVE to be $200 retail. but the secondary market nuked the whole concept of what sneakers are "worth"

You May Also Like

1/“What would need to be true for you to….X”

Why is this the most powerful question you can ask when attempting to reach an agreement with another human being or organization?

A thread, co-written by @deanmbrody:


2/ First, “X” could be lots of things. Examples: What would need to be true for you to

- “Feel it's in our best interest for me to be CMO"
- “Feel that we’re in a good place as a company”
- “Feel that we’re on the same page”
- “Feel that we both got what we wanted from this deal

3/ Normally, we aren’t that direct. Example from startup/VC land:

Founders leave VC meetings thinking that every VC will invest, but they rarely do.

Worse over, the founders don’t know what they need to do in order to be fundable.

4/ So why should you ask the magic Q?

To get clarity.

You want to know where you stand, and what it takes to get what you want in a way that also gets them what they want.

It also holds them (mentally) accountable once the thing they need becomes true.

5/ Staying in the context of soliciting investors, the question is “what would need to be true for you to want to invest (or partner with us on this journey, etc)?”

Multiple responses to this question are likely to deliver a positive result.