Whoever loves his wife, loves himself!

Very early in my marriage, I remember vividly my wife complained about her phone which was not working well anymore due to battery 'ish' and distaste; so she was stylishly demanding for a new phone.

There's a particular kind of romantic partnership, with a certain sort of person, that I've wanted since I became a self-aware, directed agent at around age 15.

Empirically, this kind of relationship has been hard to achieve. It hasn't worked out yet, at least.

And this sometimes leaves me wondering if my standards are unreasonable.

In years past that desire was often very alive.

These days, I'm rarely directly or viscerally in contact with it.

I sometimes contemplate aiming for some other kind of romantic and/or sexual relationship instead. In part because I might be more effective if I...I don't know, got laid more? But that's not really the thing. More like, if I had someone around whom I could regularly relax.

But mostly, I don't pursue those alternative relationship-setups out of a sense of something like loyalty to myself + a vague sense of wrongness and/or sadness about it. It often feels like giving up or giving in.

[I might elaborate on the wrongness sometime.]

6th SUNDAY SPECIAL #ShoutOut

Hard Core Right Wingers

Step 1-Retweet ALL Lists

Step 2-Follow ALL 289 Handles in ALL 17 Lists

Step 3-Honestly FOLLOW BACK the ONEs who follow u

Earlier Lists welcome for Multiplying

सब जुड़ जाओ, एक हो जाओ

RW को फ़ौलाद💪बना दो

#HinduEcosystem

List 1

@FltLtAnoopVerma
@mickeyanoop
@Bharatiyasatyam
@ModIfiedAksHIT
@AshishMakhijani
@AbePappi
@Neh_hope_faith
@VenkateshBung
@IndianSarthak01
@iMuditJain
@ShravanBJYM
@DrxPragya
@isinghDeepanshu
@suyashdeep
@SuyashJ09
@TusharKant_Naik
@arunkdimpu
@Coachketang

#HinduEcosystem

List 2

@thisissAnjaliG
@Naiktanmay111
@NikhilChelsea12
@IvaSaina
@neil_sane
@aarti162004
@AppamWidUndhiyu
@The_NitinD
@Nitin_vn46
@NikhilBhamre8
@C_JackMH26
@SimzAU
@Impregnable007
@Manika_0315
@BhatiaCrish
@LibtardsKaDoc
@Horse_stable13
@oldschoolmonk1
@Anu_2208
#HinduEcosystem

List 3

@Aartitva
@TraderChirag
@ibonthewayindia
@RubishRaja
@NidarAryan
@doubtfulLucifer
@pandey_kill_bil
@PrathamShashank
@SanataniMarwadi
@DubeyYash1911
@bayonetwarrior
@satyamev21
@parasadukia
@Sanghi_wrath
@hritwik_paul
@just_bhakt
@ss_aarthi
@JRamlingam

#HinduEcosystem

List 4

@UshaNirmala
@Ajusan123
@Nayak1812
@Ayush_Shah_25
@shakti050
@kunaljain_19
@HashtagAviral
@abhi_rocks1004
@sanghini_
@GouriBhide
@KhamanDhokIa
@Shreyas54125712
@Shreya1176
@shubham_ag7
@proudsanghii
@sanghialien
@_Sanghi_Saffron
@saffronpride_
@BHARTIYFOJI
#HinduEcosystem

@ImPranav_M @GunduHuDuGa That's a good qsn, if not a bit nuanced. Avataras are of many varieties and frankly, most of the classification is only for our understanding and not really binding on Paramatma Himself. We can take several approaches to understanding this. If you go by a Vedantic approach,+

@GunduHuDuGa Avatara means that which descends from an exalted state (Taara). Going by Upanishadic observaton of Purnam adham purnam idham, every manifestation of Bhagavan is indeed wholesome. In fact, Avataras usually happen when Iswara is propitiated with certain qualities already+

@GunduHuDuGa described in the Vedas by other Devatas. So, in order to please them, He assumes the form that best envisages the said Vaidika tatvam. For example, Varaha and Nrusimha avatars, though they have sthoola prayojanas, also exemplify the Tejovanna tatvam propounded by Upanishads.+

@GunduHuDuGa All these tatvams ultimately emanate from Him so whatever form He takes is indeed Purna. Now, one may ask then if that's the case, why such a distinction had to be made in the first place. That is because of upasana vidhis and understanding of how Bhagavad tatvam shines+

@GunduHuDuGa with each Leela being performed. Let's take Nrusimha avatar. The purpose of the avatar is neither to save Hiranyakasipu nor rescue Prahlada. For that He need not descend down as H's boons are applicable only for Brahman's creation and not Paramatma Himself.+

Christianity has been a weapon used by systems of oppression to call that which is harmful and abusive; good and God’s will. It has been a weapon to normalize hegemonic power, and keep people from questioning it or challenging it because “it comes from God.”

1/

Gender “norms,” harmful ideas about sexuality, social hierarchy, the construct of race, notions of nuclear family, toxic ideologies of work, bodies, finances, government, relationships, parenting, or criminal justice; are all rooted in Christianity and...

2/

backed up by verses of the Christian Bible taken out of context, to assert that this isn’t just normal, but what God desires. And who dares challenge God?

Christianity has allowed for people w/power to use the idea of god, and *his* “word,” to pass their ideas as God ideas.
3/

This is one of the reasons why people react so violently when we say the Bible is not the word of God, they can’t accept that everything they’ve been given as normal, good, ideal, God’s will... may just not be so.

4/

Their nervous systems tells them it is better to maintain the certainty of what is in their hands; even though it causes harm; than to give into the uncertainty of imagining a different world where equity is possible.

And then their ego gets involved, and admitting they’ve

5/