Categories Finance
Inside: Competition is Killing Us; Predatory lender seeks national bank charter; Militarizing cops was a failure; and more!
Archived at: https://t.co/mFat1Fsadn
#Pluralistic
1/

Competition is Killing Us: Consumer harm considered harmful.
https://t.co/oJTENrDhFD
2/

2020 was a shitty year for most things, but it was a banner year for books about fighting monopolies, and for the fight itself.
— Cory Doctorow #BLM (@doctorow) January 8, 2021
It started (in Dec '19) with @matthewstoller's GOLIATH, a massive, comprehensive history of monopolies in America.https://t.co/qzY5dPnKRg
1/ pic.twitter.com/QrIiO9xpkC
Predatory lender seeks national bank charter: Oportun led America in suing latinx borrowers during the pandemic.
https://t.co/FPK6NTwFjj
3/

"Partner with us today to build a better tomorrow" - that's the slogan for @oportun, a predatory lender that sued more poor latinx people during the pandemic than any other.https://t.co/ULX8hBCO5a
— Cory Doctorow #BLM (@doctorow) January 8, 2021
1/ pic.twitter.com/iuAerlngZC
Militarizing cops was a failure: Water still wet.
https://t.co/OACizKzNru
4/

In 1997, the Clinton administration created the "1033" program, whereby the Pentagon gave away its "surplus" equipment to local law enforcement agencies, leading to the nationwide militarization of America's cops.
— Cory Doctorow #BLM (@doctorow) January 8, 2021
1/ pic.twitter.com/nfmqyqmGDx
#15yrsago Hollywood’s Canadian MP claims she’s no dirtier than the rest https://t.co/iOEH3n3sON
#15yrsago John McDaid’s brilliant sf story Keyboard Practice free online https://t.co/ciVbtorYiV
5/


I joined @senatorscarnati to intro a bill to expand voter access, implement greater efficiencies within Pennsylvania\u2019s voting process and maintain election security. It doesn\u2019t matter what the process is for casting a ballot if the results are in question. https://t.co/tEoC4YTuKI
— Senator Jake Corman (@JakeCorman) August 25, 2020
It's one of those small UK if-it-were-listed-in-the-US companies. Bidstack #BIDS and it puts advertising into major online games
It's rocketing - and there are some grounds to think that in quite short order it may be about to turn into a firework
Not Boku and not for widows & orphans but looking around here, it has the kind of following where rival factions of the warmer kind of bulletin board gang members gun each other down on twitter with rocket emojis but if the Swedes or Americans discover it, can it stay a \xa322M cap? https://t.co/Fa2r6JgTTq
— HRouge (@hareng_rouge) December 17, 2020
"May" and also:
- history of over promising and disappointing
- very much a AIM small cap
- burns cash
- will place and dilute
- has share price on homepage
- Glassdoor is not great
- emoji issues when discussed
*But* it may now be delivering for real. If so it may also be extremely cheap. How cheap?
20H1 was 2x sequentially and 10x YoY
It may be about to report H1-H2 sequential growth of 5x.
If so, FY20: 10x YoY.
Fwd 21 rev multiple? Perhaps half that number, perhaps even less.

I need to explain in some detail what they do because it's necessary to understand it to gauge not only the opportunity but also the risk - and also to be able to translate aspects of what the company put out in their releases. The juicy stuff comes after.
As simply as I can: Bidstack provide a SDK (software developer kit) to games companies: so far Sega and Codemasters
The SDK allows companies to create areas in their games where adverts can be placed by Bidstack.
The ads appear within the fabric of the game, natively
Many may think that the product @AlphaFinanceLab = Alpha Homora, but that would be akin to saying Adobe Photoshop is Adobe.

2) Alpha aims to be a suite of #DeFi products that looks for market opportunities in DeFi by solving its problems. They will identify a problem and then build quick to be the first mover.
3) Alpha Homora (leveraged yield farming) happens to be the first. Heck Homora could very well turn out to be its Adobe Prelude and we haven't even gotten to its flagship Photoshop yet.
4) In this thread I will focus on it's upcoming project AlphaX (beta testnet round2), because people are already familiar with Alpha Homora.
5) Here are 2 great threads if you want to look into Alpha Homora more in depth:
V2 overview - https://t.co/srsWaDoCyH
Ironbank (capital efficient lending) integration with @creamdotfinance $cream -
As the release of @AlphaFinanceLab Homora v2 seems to get closer by the day, let's take closer look at the protocol, the various components, and what's coming.
— Sawit Trisirisatayawong (@tansawit) January 24, 2021
\U0001f9f5\U0001f447
I guess much has been said/written/memed about the most recent r/WSB YOLO short squeeze, and tbh have nothing really smart to add... but i'm puzzled by the pro-investment community reaction to this (namely HFs, bank sales desks
and prop traders)...
While squeezing traders position has long been a guilty pleasure of the Hedge Fund community (and few aggressive banks, with questionable motives to skew prices), everybody seem to be shocked that retail traders do that, and running a decent risk management
scheme...
My best recollection of a brutal position squeeze was the $12bn JPM lost on CDX spread (aka, the London Whale)
https://t.co/bDHAL2UwpX
Back in these days the entire market knew that JP's trader was, in fact, the entire position in the illiquid index (off-the-run)
so almost every credit trader that I knew traded against that position... Now, that's perfectly legal right? it's not crossing any legal boundaries of price manipulation, so why is it ok for pro traders to do that but it becomes shocking when your neighbor's kid does that?
and the CDX example is only one of a handful of examples of skewed position that got squeezed hard, the only difference is the orderbook distribution...
While in "normal" markets orderbook distribution oscillates between normal to slightly skewed, in the YOLO case I think that
My take: the economics aren't very good, but the political economy may make such checks necessary 2/ https://t.co/XY7d9E8SDY

The key economic argument, which @crampell picks up on, is that given a slump that has affected people very unevenly, aid should concentrate on those actually suffering 3/
So if you have a fixed amount to spend, unemployment benefits and maybe small-business aid should be priorities, not checks that will in many cases go to people who are doing OK 4/
But is there a fixed amount to spend? No binding budget constraint for the feds, so this is all about politics. And my sense is that broad issuance of checks is actually kind of a loss leader, helping to sell a package that includes UI 5/