The farmer is not our saintly anadata!

Yes they deserve respect for what they do but it's fact that he doesn't do anyone else a favour by growing foodgrains. Remember farming is his occupation that earns him a livelihood that provides for his family. Just like the rest of us.
1

No one is forcing a #farmer to carry on farming if he can't make it pay for itself.

We have witnessed farmers migration for better life in states like Bihar, Jharkhand and UP.

2
We know that farmers are given free power, free water, subsidies on seed, subsidies on fertiliser, MSP, and others. Farmers are not even charged income tax.

Even after all this benefits if "Large Farmers" can't be profitable there is something wrong in their intention!

3
It is true that farming is subsidised around the world. But not to the extent that is being demanded in India. Both in absolute terms and in relative terms our farm subsidies are very high.

It is still ok but the benefits should be given to small and marginal farmers

4
We need to allow consolidation of farm holdings and our subsidies need to be rationalised.

More than our farmers it is the landless labour of rural and urban India that deserves our sympathy and government support.

5
In India, government and taxpayers have been supporting them for long. What else is needed to manage a profitable show

.. problem is these "Large Farmers" are exploiting these benefits for there advantage and small farmers are struggling for livelihood.

5
If after all these measures farming isn't remunerative, let's do ourselves a favour and give it up

Can we not start an agitation that benefits should only go to small and marginal farmers?

Can people in any other occupation hold the rest of us to ransom for similar benefits?

6
In a democracy there are two ways to make laws

1. through an elected legislature 2. through legal challenges mounted through constitutional courts. There is no third way

Please explore -

What this agitation all about?
Who is funding this agitation?
Why only Large Farmers?

7
Blocking highways, trains and threatening to destroy property and indulge in violence against the state and private property is not democratic protest

It is hooliganism and thuggery by #LargeFarmers, and those egging it on are no better than hooligans and criminals themselves

8
The farmers' agitation has clearly been infiltrated by forces that have little to do with farmers' welfare.

It is nothing more than a large political campaign by #LargeFarmers

9
While opposition parties are well within their rights to support their demands in the hope of reaping future electoral benefits.

But foreign leaders and anti India organisations housed in countries are totally not welcome to butt in.

Don't make our internal issue global

10
Yes, It's true that farming is susceptible to a lot of vagaries of weather, disease, market forces, but then that is true of most occupations.

Why should the farmer have the first call on our collective sympathy and resources.

11
India's villages are no islands of pastoral and progressive virtue. They are bastions of feudalism, casteism, communalism and patriarchy. By uncritically supporting their economic and political demands we are unwittingly strengthening these damaging social pathologies as well.
12
While crony capitalism is a very genuine concern in a general sense, at this stage it is simply premature to say that the farming sector reforms are done with any specific corporates in mind.

Our farm sector needs a shake up. period!

More from Farmer protest

You May Also Like

A brief analysis and comparison of the CSS for Twitter's PWA vs Twitter's legacy desktop website. The difference is dramatic and I'll touch on some reasons why.

Legacy site *downloads* ~630 KB CSS per theme and writing direction.

6,769 rules
9,252 selectors
16.7k declarations
3,370 unique declarations
44 media queries
36 unique colors
50 unique background colors
46 unique font sizes
39 unique z-indices

https://t.co/qyl4Bt1i5x


PWA *incrementally generates* ~30 KB CSS that handles all themes and writing directions.

735 rules
740 selectors
757 declarations
730 unique declarations
0 media queries
11 unique colors
32 unique background colors
15 unique font sizes
7 unique z-indices

https://t.co/w7oNG5KUkJ


The legacy site's CSS is what happens when hundreds of people directly write CSS over many years. Specificity wars, redundancy, a house of cards that can't be fixed. The result is extremely inefficient and error-prone styling that punishes users and developers.

The PWA's CSS is generated on-demand by a JS framework that manages styles and outputs "atomic CSS". The framework can enforce strict constraints and perform optimisations, which is why the CSS is so much smaller and safer. Style conflicts and unbounded CSS growth are avoided.