2/20
THREAD on how economically Muslims maybe poorer (the state is overall also not as rich) in #Bengal but have relatively got socio-political empowerment (part of Threads I am writing for the understanding of Bengal politics in the context of upcoming assembly election):
1/20
2/20
3/20
4/20
5/20
6/20
7/20
9/20
10/20
11/
12/20
13/20
14/20
15/20
16/20
17/20
18/20
19/20
20/20
More from Economy
Latest @SouledOutWorld articles:
(Article Thread)
All in one convenient location to access.
https://t.co/TuyltZTyW0
https://t.co/XJJRvpLRQE
https://t.co/NeeFCfMkP2
https://t.co/yFtbIgqzzm
(Article Thread)
All in one convenient location to access.
https://t.co/TuyltZTyW0
True State of the Nation
— Secret SoSHHiety (@SouledOutWorld) December 19, 2020
You think you know what's coming... but you don't...https://t.co/MVoIuxgaWX pic.twitter.com/DtF2Q53HrT
https://t.co/XJJRvpLRQE
Truth About Antarctica
— Secret SoSHHiety (@SouledOutWorld) December 19, 2020
Why? Scalar EM Antennas are kept at Antarctica; Scalar EM weaponry is the anonymous weapon to be used by the White Horse of Rev 6.https://t.co/7CDzmQfLSX pic.twitter.com/0400oCN8io
https://t.co/NeeFCfMkP2
The Finger (fuck you/fuck the world)
— Secret SoSHHiety (@SouledOutWorld) December 18, 2020
The middle finger is the Saturn finger.https://t.co/BsrsBE3f5h pic.twitter.com/ZJqZll8lU1
https://t.co/yFtbIgqzzm
Bread and Circuses
— Secret SoSHHiety (@SouledOutWorld) December 18, 2020
Bring in the clowns & the fast food...https://t.co/SZAlfkqTI3 pic.twitter.com/gLys0mNMIq
You May Also Like
I just finished Eric Adler's The Battle of the Classics, and wanted to say something about Joel Christiansen's review linked below. I am not sure what motivates the review (I speculate a bit below), but it gives a very misleading impression of the book. 1/x
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x
As someone\u2019s who\u2019s read the book, this review strikes me as tremendously unfair. It mostly faults Adler for not writing the book the reviewer wishes he had! https://t.co/pqpt5Ziivj
— Teresa M. Bejan (@tmbejan) January 12, 2021
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x