Michael Pettis @michaelxpettis argues that it is not always obvious who (China or the U.S.) adjusts best to "turbulent changes."
Bitcoin answers that question.
Thread:

World economies currently suffer four major redistribution challenges:
The most important is increasing government stealth use of the monetary system to confiscate assets from productive actors.
/2
That process is exacerbated by "Cantillon Effect" transfers to interest groups close to government ("the entitled class," public sector workers, the medical industrial complex, academia, etc....), which is destroying much of that wealth /3
The shadow nature (see Keynes) of government inflation makes the process unidentifiable, un-addressable and undemocratic.
The biggest victims (America's poorly educated young) are unequipped to counter generational confiscation tactics of today's wily senior beneficiaries. /4
Government control of the numéraire in key economic statistics (GDP, inflation, etc...) makes it impossible for economic actors to measure progress and liabilities. /5
Bitcoin, with its easily measurable money supply, has the potential to provide an objective assessment of the value that economic actors attach to government statistics.

Bitcoin is currently flashing serious warning signals that something is very wrong.
/6
For Bitcoin to continue to function as a warning signal, there must be forces in place to counterbalance "fractional reserve Bitcoin" providers such as PayPal, Bitcoin ETFs, other rehypothecation tools.
/7
This implies the need for increased use by private sector actors of multi-currency tools.
These include the Lightning Network, store of value payment systems such as BCH and BSV, and privacy coins. /8
In short - if America allows free market currency features to thrive, it will adjust better than China.

But America clamps down and incorporates Bitcoin into its existing Surveillance Coin system, China (which has far more experience in totalitarianism) will dominate. /9

More from Crypto

You May Also Like

“We don’t negotiate salaries” is a negotiation tactic.

Always. No, your company is not an exception.

A tactic I don’t appreciate at all because of how unfairly it penalizes low-leverage, junior employees, and those loyal enough not to question it, but that’s negotiation for you after all. Weaponized information asymmetry.

Listen to Aditya


And by the way, you should never be worried that an offer would be withdrawn if you politely negotiate.

I have seen this happen *extremely* rarely, mostly to women, and anyway is a giant red flag. It suggests you probably didn’t want to work there.

You wish there was no negotiating so it would all be more fair? I feel you, but it’s not happening.

Instead, negotiate hard, use your privilege, and then go and share numbers with your underrepresented and underpaid colleagues. […]