Options used to be close to irrelevant for bitcoin's price.

Until now.

At current price levels, hedging large option notionals has a major impact on price.

Here's a quick thread on options 👇

Let's start with the meaning of delta.

Delta is the rate of change of an option's price relative to a change in the price of its underlying.

For example, the price of a 50 delta option will move 50% as much as the underlying.
For practical purposes, think of it as how much of the underlying you have:

- if long 50 delta call on 1 BTC => long 0.5 BTC
- if long 50 delta put on 1 BTC => short 0.5 BTC
- if short 50 delta call on 1 BTC => short 0.5 BTC
- if short 50 delta put on 1 BTC => long 0.5 BTC
An option where the option's strike (i.e. exercise price) is equal to current spot price is known as an at-the-money option (ATM). ATM options have a delta of 50, while deep in the money options have a delta of close to 100.
Can also think of delta as probability. A 50 delta option has a 50% chance of expiring in the money.

For a call, the higher price goes => the more in the money the call => the higher the delta.

Once delta gets close to 100, odds are ~100% the option will expire in the money.
Gamma is the rate of change of an option's delta relative to a change in the price of its underlying.

When you buy an option, you are long gamma.

That means the further in the money the option goes, the faster the option's price will increase.

That's positive convexity.
Can also think of Delta as speed and Gamma as acceleration.
Delta and Gamma together with Vega and Theta are part of *the Greeks*.

The greeks all measure the sensitivity of an option to various changes.

There are other greeks, such as Rho, Volga and Vanna, but understanding these is not necessary now.
Vega is the rate of change of an option's price relative to a change in its implied volatility.

Theta is the rate of change of an option's price relative to a change in time to expiry.
When buying an option, a trader is long gamma (convexity), long vega (volatility), and short theta (time decay).

The option loses value as time passes. A trader who is long an option compensates time decay with convexity.
Imagine an options seller (a dealer) who wants to hedge his delta exposure. By doing so he becomes delta neutral.

Say he sold a BTC call, so he buys bitcoin to hedge. As price goes up, to remain delta neutral, he buys more bitcoin.
The dealer is short gamma. So the more price goes up, the more the dealer has to buy to remain delta neutral, generating on the extremes what is known as a Gamma Squeeze.

Gamma is the key.

Or more precisely, the gamma position of those who hedge their delta (mostly dealers).
When dealers gamma profile is negative, they will buy on the way up, and sell on the way down, amplifying market moves.

Conversely, when dealers have positive gamma, they will buy on the way down, and sell on the way up, dampening moves.

TL;DR Negative Gamma = Violent Moves
This shows why this is relevant now

https://t.co/LJ6eYYRctX

More from Crypto

2020 was a game changer for Ethereum.

The vast majority of its success was fueled by #DeFi.

Here's what happened in 5 Tweets 🔽

1) Governance Tokens 🪙

Projects gave complete ownership of billion dollar protocols to their users, often using retroactive airdrops.

Early adopters earned tokens for past usage, and token-based voting now dictates all technical


2) Liquidity Mining ⛏️

Power users were the first to earn on-going distribution by providing liquidity.

$COMP sparked the wave, with $BAL coining the term a few weeks


3) Yield Faming 🌾

Projects coupled liquidity mining and governance tokens to boost 'yields' by combining lending rates with an incentive layer.

APYs peaked as high as 1M% during 'DeFi summer', leading to a 'food coin' craze like $YAM and


4) Fair Launches ✅

Who needs investment when you can launch using yield farming?

@iearnfinance debuted $YFI with no formal funding, seeding a community treasury for self-sustainability.

The notion of a core team and community became one and the
Back with another #FreeLoveFriday. Last time, we covered how Mastercoin/@Omni_Layer pioneered digital asset issuance on blockchains. Today, let’s discuss @Chainlink and the vital role it plays in connecting blockchains to the real world.


I have said repeatedly that digital asset issuance is the killer application for blockchains. The next frontier is bringing real world assets to networks like @AvalancheAVAX, but we often face a significant problem:

Namely, how do you get data from the real world onto blockchains and into applications running on them? More critically, how do you achieve that securely and transparently in real-time? Smart contracts are tamper-proof, but they're only as reliable as their input data.

Enter ChainLink in September 2017, with a whitepaper outlining a vision for a decentralized network of “oracles,” entities that inject facts from the external world into blockchains in a suitable format for smart contracts.

Until ChainLink, oracles were trusted and centralized. This is a huge problem for high-value assets and smart contracts. High value projects, such as @CelsiusNetwork, @synthetix_io, @Aaveaave and others depend critically on oracle data.

You May Also Like