BC CRYPTO
Saved by @Alex1Powell

Many close calls later, BTC finally managed to break through $20k -- and it BLEW through it, barely slowing down til $22k. What was different this time?

A thread about man vs. machine.

https://t.co/mGRJ852xVb

 As has been pointed out, I've been adamant that the rallies in the past month or so have been heavily fueled by rampant liquidations on both BitMEX and Binance. And they have! But they were also fueled by organic buying among U.S. investors, as has been a popular narrative.
If anything, the narratives surrounding various U.S. funds and other companies buying BTC have gotten *stronger* in the past week or two than they were around Thanksgiving. More and more funds have announced their crypto holdings or plans to acquire them.
And direct signs of all this exist. Take a look at FTX's volume monitor: U.S. trading hubs like Coinbase having more volume than normal *is* a signal that U.S. customers are doing *something*, and when BTC is going up ...

(Coinbase even crashed from "heightened activity :P).
The DOW recently announced their new crypto indices, CME is listing ETH futures, Microstrategy putting $650M into BTC, GBTC AUM continuing to balloon, these all point in the same direction, and that direction is a resounding "up" for the crypto markets.
So, the institutional BTC buying is both more intense and more "robust" -- it's *everywhere*, not just a few firms.

But something else was different, too. Note in the volume monitor, Coinbase's volume is higher than usual -- but it's also really low globally.
Derivatives markets (outside the U.S.) still, of course, have the *vast* majority of volume -- they have leverage, so they almost have to. This was true in the last run-ups too -- but just "futures" isn't enough to tell the whole story.
The previous run-ups were dominated by aggressive buyers in a few markets with really high leverage -- Binance and BitMEX perps, mostly. This time, those were in the mix -- heavily! -- but not quite as heavily as some other products.
Here's a report one of Alameda's traders made that runs every hour and tells us about the products with the biggest OI changes, as well as their price moves. In the hour from the biggest moves right before BTC hit $20k, the biggest inflows were actually in ... March quarterlies?
And the returns column indicates that the premium on those quarterlies went up a TON more than other products' did -- these were AGGRESSIVE buyers, and they were buying a ton. This was the pattern for most of these inflows -- less BitMEX/Binance perps, more quarterlies/spot.
A big difference? These products (spot and the OK/HB quarterlies) tend to have way less leverage (possible or realized, as the case may be) -- the positions get held for more time, and buyers in them tend to indicate "I'm buying to hold" more than "I'm buying to scalp."
And they get liquidated less, too -- so these buys weren't apt to get undone as easily as 100x levered-long Binance perps would on the first draw-down. All this is to say: this rally was driven by more "organic" buying, in both spot and derivatives markets.
If you're just running a study on the past few weeks, you might come to the conclusion that selling near $20k is just an incredible trade -- we ran this study and came to that conclusion a few times! Here's a post I made in our "delta-force" channel on Slack:
You could imagine studies which nail things like "if it's these products leading do X near $20k, if these do Y" -- but there were like, 5 data points, and that's just not enough to optimize this. It's enough to think selling $19900 makes sense on average -- not much else.
So all our fancy data analysis wasn't going to be enough -- to really nail predicting what happened when BTC *did* break through $20k, you'd need human intuition -- noticing what I said about re: quarterlies being different, guessing that meant the inflows were "stickier."
Alameda did know things were different during the run-up, but I'll admit we didn't *nail* this -- we still thought that there'd be $20k resistance even though the U.S. / sticky inflows were definitely there. And, actually, there was a TON of $20k (and just above) selling ...
... but not enough to counter-act all the liquidations that happened as BTC crossed the $20k threshold :P (I didn't say they *didn't* happen). Indeed, remember all the levered-up shorts that got opened on Binance and BitMEX during the fall after the last $20k test?
Yeah: they got "rekt." TONS of liquidations during the rally above $20k, which is what allowed BTC to push through all the legitimate selling pressure. Here's another report Alameda uses to keep track of those sorts of things in aggregate (we also have loud alerts):
An interesting thing about these: liquidations by definition are *closing* someone's positions. But OIs did *not* go down by enough when these happened, and premia did *not* go up enough. This meant there was a LOT of selling -- about half as much as got liquidated.
With around half as many shorts getting liquidated? Probably the post-pop reversion here goes down a LOT more -- back down to 19700 or something? Unclear, liquidity got low. But back down for sure, at least temporarily (we now know people probably buy it back up :P).
What followed here was an exercise in favoring human intuition over a computer's studies -- what would the markets do in a new paradigm where waiting to pass the ATH wasn't a factor? Well, the new paradigm looked a lot like the old one in some ways ...
Liquidity was LOW (still sorta is, but that's changing). This meant that big orders had a LOT of impact, and as that impact (plus natural buying pressure) accrues, it compounds, as more shorts got liquidated. Sounds familiar!

https://t.co/POuO8KLNdf
A case study in how low liquidity got: BitMEX's ETH/BTC quanto perp is pretty liquid, usually -- it can absorb orders of several mil without much issue. When a $15M or so liquidation popped up? It was on the book for minutes! Stepping up and up and up.
(There's actually a cool trade there -- the bid gets richer and richer, and if you can buy ETH on other markets as it slowly steps up, which is sometimes possible if you're crafty, you can buy before all its impact and then sell the BitMEX bid rich, locking in fast profit.)
So, betting on momentum seemed likely still pretty good -- and it *really* has been! Our strategy sorta became "buy whenever we're near levels where we predict shorts might get liquidated" and that's gone quite well. But it is different, because there was no "top."
And, we *knew* there was real, organic selling interest somewhere. Ended up materializing a few times under $24k so far, and the low liquidity + new longs getting opened meant it was pretty possible for a HUGE draw-down -- so the momentum bets have been of a different nature.
Also, alts have been behaving with haphazard betas, and not having so consistent liquidations as they did in the last alt run-up -- it's because a lot of shorts already got liquidated last time, but it highlights another difference / way intuition needs to dominate strategy here.
But, something like recognizing XRP did GREAT during the last U.S.-driven BTC run-up might lead a human to think it might do that again -- even with just the one data point. And that intuition might lead you to put on some good deltas, if you timed it right!
So, what next? Who knows! This is pretty uncharted territory -- low liquidity, new price levels, new products dominating, maybe more U.S. stuff but is it over-impacted? Will alts catch up more robustly? Which? Sadly for us, studies probably gonna keep coming up short.
Alameda's doing a lot of *thinking* about what we should be doing on all but the shortest timescales, and a lot of it is gut-based (also news-based, staring at orders-based, and similar). I'm sure you're all doing the same -- may the best humans (or very impressive machines) win!

More from Crypto

\U0001f42e Mikko Ohtamaa
🐮 Mikko Ohtamaa...
@moo9000
1/ ERC-20 token standard approve() has caused an unnecessary cost of $53.8M for #Ethereum and #DeFi users

This is bad. Continue reading why and how to avoid this in the future.

👇👇👇


2/ Before you go all rage on the flaws of my analysis, please read the whole Twitter thread for disclaimers and caveats.


3/ approve() is an unnecessary step of ERC-20 tokens when they interact with smart contracts.

You know this because when you do a Uniswap trade you need press two transaction buttons instead of one.


4/ Why there is approve() - you can read the history in this Twitter


5/ I queried all approve() transactions on Google BigQuery public dataset and calculated their ETH cost and then converted this to the USD with the current ETH price.
CRYPTO
Jason Choi
Jason Choi
@mrjasonchoi
Crypto trading - some personal takeaways from 2020

Disclaimer: my job requires picking investments, at times with short/medium term view (days-months), many times with a long term view (years).

This is mostly a thread on reminders to myself relating mostly to the former.

Watch out for decisions based on fear & greed

Confirmation bias (ignoring contrary signals), anchoring bias (married to entry, trading PnL), sizing too big on low r/r trades, hesitating to buy cheap assets because "it's fallen/rallied too much".

/1

Minimize regret

Constantly question whether you have done all you could to maximize returns in the past month/quarter. Review all tools at your disposal (vol strats, momentum strats, fundamentals) but don't Dunning-Kruger yourself. There are no jack of all trades.

/2

You can't catch them all

Don't regret missing out on a few trades/ investments. Better to win big on 1 high conviction idea then win big on 100 small ones. Be ok with missing out but be ruthless with not learning from it.

/3
CRYPTO
Advertisement
Ben Kaufman
Ben Kaufman
@_benkaufman
🧵Thread: 10 Rules for Verification on a #Bitcoin Hardware Wallet 👇

Rule #1: DO NOT TRUST THE COMPUTER SCREEN.

The very reason for using a hardware wallet is that your computer IS compromised, trusting it makes using the hardware wallet an expensive security theatre (or 2FA at best).
Always verify on the HWW device screen!

Rule #2: Verify your "receive" addresses BEFORE accepting funds.

A compromised computer can be tricked into displaying addresses that belong to an attacker. The only way to make sure you own the addresses is to display them on the HWW device and verify they match.

Rule #3: Verifying change address should be done by the device when sending funds, not before like receive addresses!

It is pointless at best, and misleading at worst, to verify them beforehand like receive addresses...

All hardware wallets support verifying the change address belongs to you AT TIME OF SIGNING A TRANSACTION.
Verifying before that is pointless and error-prone.

Now let's talk some multisig...
CRYPTO
Vlad "BTCTKVR.com\u201d Costea \U0001f7e7
Vlad "BTCTKVR.com” Cos...
@TheVladCostea
I usually stay away from price predictions, but this time I couldn't help it. Just published "10 reasons why bitcoin will hit $100.000 in 2021".

Share it with a normie friend, maybe he/she will understand the value proposition of

Reason no. 1: during its 12 year-old existence, Bitcoin has performed a lot better as a store of value than gold.

Reason no. 2: Bitcoin is easier and less expensive to transfer than gold. This one is pretty self-explanatory, as gold is heavy and expensive to secure.

However, I believe that we should look up to gold a lot more often & look down to USD less

Reason no. 3: Bitcoins can be carried across borders a lot easier than gold and cash.

It's simple, really. With only a general-purpose electronic device (phone, laptop), piece of paper, or even 12 words that you memorize, you can move your wealth in a different country.

Reason no. 4: Bitcoin transactions cannot be censored.

In a world where PayPal and Visa can dictate your policy as a business and can shut you up from expressing political opinions, Bitcoin has a lot of value.
CRYPTO
Thetamind
Thetamind
@thetamind37
The new age of privacy, and the crypto ecosystem that will enable it.

A Thread.
$XHV $SCRT $RUNE
1/

Throughout my research, @HavenXHV The Haven protocol renewed my faith, that privacy wasn't just a temporary trend, but something with actual, sustainability. The creation of a private bank, exchange, and access to real world assets in completely privacy of my own vault. $XHV
2/

Haven's offering to the world, with it's private assets $xUSD $xEUR $xGOLD and xSilver, made me research what else can be done privately, now that I have private stable coin options. My first question was, if I wanted to sell my private assets, how would I do it? $XHV
3/

It didn't take me long before I discovered $RUNE and @thorchain_org and their cross chain liquidity pools and decentralized exchange capabilities. How anyone can offer liquidity and earn rewards and trading fees for doing so. But also,how all trading pairs,are interchangable.
4/

This made me realize that as Thorchain grows in popularity,they will provide the ability for everyone, across the cryptosphere,to trade any coin for any coin. Kind of like uniswap, but cross chain,and outside, yet including, the erc-20 ecosystem. It's uniswap on steroids. $XHV
5/
CRYPTO

You May Also Like

Aditya Todmal
Aditya Todmal
@AdityaTodmal
A THREAD ON @SarangSood

Decoded his way of analysis/logics for everyone to easily understand.

Have covered:
1. Analysis of volatility, how to foresee/signs.
2. Workbook
3. When to sell options
4. Diff category of days
5. How movement of option prices tell us what will happen

1. Keeps following volatility super closely.

Makes 7-8 different strategies to give him a sense of what's going on.

Whichever gives highest profit he trades in.


2. Theta falls when market moves.
Falls where market is headed towards not on our original position.


3. If you're an options seller then sell only when volatility is dropping, there is a high probability of you making the right trade and getting profit as a result

He believes in a market operator, if market mover sells volatility Sarang Sir joins him.


4. Theta decay vs Fall in vega

Sell when Vega is falling rather than for theta decay. You won't be trapped and higher probability of making profit.
OPTIONSLEARNINGS , OPTIONSBASICS , OPTIONSLEARNINGSSARANGSOOD
\u092c\u094d\u0930\u093e\u0939\u094d\u092e\u0923\u094b\u0902 \u0915\u093e \u0907\u0924\u093f\u0939\u093e\u0938\U0001f441\ufe0f\U0001f441\ufe0f
ब्राह्मणों का इतिहास👁️...
@BRAHMIN_0052
MOHIYAL_BRAHMIN_KING
RAJA_PORUS
King_Porus_History

1)King Porus was a famous Indian king, his real name was #Purushotama. He belonged to PURU tribe mentioned in #RIG_VEDA, the Ancient books of India.


2) Porus ruled the Punjab region and expanded his kingdom between the Jhelum River and Chenab River in the Indian Subcontinent. He was a legendary warrior and more war skills. He made the army most powerful with war skills. Even Alexander had also made difficulty to defeat Porus.

3)Word of Mouth Oral tradition in #Mohyal_Brahmin families since ancient times has kept the Great Saga of their Great Elder known to them as Maharaja “ #Puru” alive.

4) When #Alexander the Great invaded India in 326 BC he was challenged near Taxila by a mere chieftain of the Area. He was King #Porus, a #Vaid_Mohyal. After his encounter with Porus, Alexander met with more resistance near Multan where the forces were predominantly #Mohyal.

5)The Bali rulers of Multan fiercely engaged with Alexander's army in skirmishes in which many senior Generals died. Later during the long and bitter fighting in #Multan, Alexander got hurt by an arrow which pierced his chest ,
RELIGION
Advertisement
Anu Satheesh \U0001f1ee\U0001f1f3
Anu Satheesh 🇮🇳...
@AnuSatheesh5
Eri Katha Ramar Temple
Maduranthakam

Eri Katha Ramar temple is located at Maduranthakam near Chengalpattu of Tamil Nadu. Beautiful Kodanda Ramar of about 8ft holding Ma Sita's hand & with Lakshmana. This temple story is connected with Sri Ramanujar.
@LostTemple7


It was here Periya Nambigal performed Pancha Samskaaram to Ramanujar under Magizham tree.
Sri Ramanujar was on his way from Kanchipuram to meet Sri Periya Nambigal at Sri Rangam to become his disciple. Sri Periya Nambigal also started towards Kanchipuram to meet Ramanujar.


They both met here at Madurantakam.
Small Mandapam where Ramanujar undertook Pancha Samskaaram is seen in the temple. Separate sannidhi is for Periya Nambigal & Ramanujar & this is the only temple where Ramanujar is seen as a Grahastha (married person) and not in Sanyasa kolam.


Story says about an incident which occurred during British rule. The Madurantakam lake bund was about to breach, due to heavy rain & village will be flooded if it happened. Dt collector was Cl. Lionel Blaze who took efforts to protect the bund & asked for the piles of stones


in the temple to protect it. But it was meant for Janakavalli ( sita) Thayar sannidhi which faced shortage of fund. Lionel Blaze prayed Sri Ramar to save the bund and if so he will provide fund to construct.
That night he saw in the lightning, Sri Rama & Lakshmana walked along
ALL
FT Trading\u2503Stock Trader
FT Trading┃Stock Trade...
@FT__Trading
Ever wonder how traders get in stocks before they explode? 🧐

Or find options that move 1,000% in a single day/week?🤯

I made a thread going over exactly how I find these stocks BEFORE they take off 🚀
👇👇👇

So, let's start with the software I use…

Finviz!! Finviz is a free website that I use to scan for stocks.

They have a lot of other cool features as well, but I only use their scanner.
👇

Head on over to finviz and go to the screener

Click on the “All” tab on the top and put in the criteria in the next tweet
👇

This is the first scan that I use for bullish swing setups
✅Quarter +10%
✅Week Down
✅Vol over 400k
✅Optionable
✅Price > $20
👇


The next scan I use is the opposite of the first one.

Simply change:
✅Quarter +10% to -10%
✅Week Down to Week up

This is my bearish scan for swing setups. 👇
TRADINGTHREAD , OPTIONS
asif
asif
@aj_raja
PAKISTAN-INDIA WATER ISSUES – HOW INDIA STOPPED WATER IN PAKISTAN's CANALS IN 1948

Thread

After partition in 1947, the water system was also bifurcated between Pakistan n India.

India cheated Pakistan when on April 1, 1948, India suddenly n without warning stopped...
1/n


...the supply of waters flowing into Pakistan's Central Bari Doab and Dipalpur Canals.

The boundary award on the partition of the sub-continent had left the headworks of these canals in Indian territory, and in accepting it India had implied her willingness to leave...

2/n


...the historic distribution of common waters undisturbed.

India's action was therefore in flagrant disregard not only of international law n morality, but of her solemn commitments with Pakistan and a gross violation of this country's historical rights over common waters.

3/n

Faced with a threat of utter desolation of millions of acres of fertile land, Pakistan had perforce to sign a document with India in which she agreed to "India's progressively diminishing water supplies to these canals and to the West Punjab government's tapping...

4/n

...alternative resources".

A specific reservation was made in the document with regard to India's claim that she had full property rights over waters flowing into her territory, and could therefore use them as she liked.

The issue was, however, to be examined...

5/n
INDIA


Category Partner: Enkryptopedia