The Lindy Effect is a theory that the future life expectancy of specific non-perishable items, like a technology or idea, is proportional to their age.
Put simply, the longer it has already lasted, the higher the likelihood it will continue to last.
In 1637, the Dutch Republic erupted into a speculative fever over an unlikely item...the tulip.
— Sahil Bloom (@SahilBloom) November 9, 2020
Tulip Mania has become a legend synonymous with market euphoria and bubbles. But is this tale all it's cracked up to be?
Who's up for a story?
\U0001f447\U0001f447\U0001f447 pic.twitter.com/cvYHoTZgdf
1/ An Allegory of Finance
— Sahil Bloom (@SahilBloom) July 18, 2020
I have been posting a lot of educational (and humorous!) threads on finance, money, and economics.
My mission is simple: to demystify these concepts and make them accessible to everyone.
All of the threads can be found below. Enjoy and please share!
First principles thinking is a powerful mental model for driving non-linear outcomes. It also requires a willingness to ask difficult, uncomfortable questions.
— Sahil Bloom (@SahilBloom) March 14, 2021
Here are a few to help you get started: pic.twitter.com/KyuAr7IUf7
#PancakeSwap Welcomes @SoteriaFinance to Syrup Pool
— PancakeSwap \U0001f95e #BSC (@PancakeSwap) January 20, 2021
Stake $CAKE, Earn\xa0$wSOTE!https://t.co/liMimqoGDy
Learn how to trade your #BinanceSmartChain assets on the @OpenOceanGlobal DEX aggregator, from within the @TrustWalletApp DApp browser.
— Trust - Crypto Wallet (@TrustWalletApp) January 20, 2021
Combine the best rates for your trades, from 3-4 different exchanges \U0001f680
Step-by-step how-to guide, here \U0001f447
Bad ballot design led to a lot of undervotes for Bill Nelson in Broward Co., possibly even enough to cost him his Senate seat. They do appear to be real undervotes, though, instead of tabulation errors. He doesn't really seem to have a path to victory. https://t.co/utUhY2KTaR
— Nate Silver (@NateSilver538) November 16, 2018
I'm increasingly interested in the idea of "personal moats" in the context of careers.
— Erik Torenberg (@eriktorenberg) November 22, 2018
Moats should be:
- Hard to learn and hard to do (but perhaps easier for you)
- Skills that are rare and valuable
- Legible
- Compounding over time
- Unique to your own talents & interests https://t.co/bB3k1YcH5b
People talk about \u201cpassive income\u201d a lot but not about \u201cpassive social capital\u201d or \u201cpassive networking\u201d or \u201cpassive knowledge gaining\u201d but that\u2019s what you can architect if you have a thing and it grows over time without intensive constant effort to sustain it
— Andrew Chen (@andrewchen) November 22, 2018
Things that look like moats but likely aren\u2019t or may fade:
— Erik Torenberg (@eriktorenberg) November 22, 2018
- Proprietary networks
- Being something other than one of the best at any tournament style-game
- Many "awards"
- Twitter followers or general reach without "respect"
- Anything that depends on information asymmetry https://t.co/abjxesVIh9
Donald Barr had a way with words. pic.twitter.com/JdRBwXPhJn
— Rudy Havenstein, listening to Nas all day. (@RudyHavenstein) September 17, 2020