hey rabbi, could you also get @realfrostylady to apologize for the implicit threat of violence to a black woman mariah macaronio?

i really prefer nonviolence---and i don't want anyone to be in danger for caring about what is going on.

@LauraJedeed for the record nick lee @econbrkfst started bullying when a close friend was diagnosed with coronavirus. in respect of the tragic circumstances, i asked to be left alone. instead, econbrkfst bullied me mercilessly. my friend has died.

i don't think its reasonable to bully people, endanger them, violate their privacy, ridicule them, etc, as they process the death of their friends. if you knew the circumstances---which i tried to keep private---you would know why i feel injured by econbrkfst's harassment of me.

thank you for respecting my grieving at this time. i ask you to step back and not jump into any witch trial mob initiated by nick lee at @econbrkfst against me, or especially, black women. @twittersupport @twittersafety

City Attorney Young also claimed to Officer Long that “he would be considering
applying for protection orders against some of the leaders in the protest groups that he felt were
especially threatening and intimidating

City Attorney Young claimed to Moore that he had been the victim of Intimidating
a Public Servant under RCW 9A.76.180, and sought criminal charges against Mr. Gibson.

City Attorney’s Office does not have lawful authority to file felony charges.
As Young did not himself have authority to file felony charges, he pressured
Moore to arrest Mr. Gibson on alleged felony charges so that Clark County Prosecuting
Attorney’s Office could file charges.

initiated an internal investigation into Sergeant Moore for
allegedly being sympathetic to “Joey Gibson” and allegedly being unsympathetic to Antifa

p. 43

On August 3, 2020, defense counsel for Ms. Carroll filed a motion to dismiss
charges filed by VCA, arguing that the charges were unconstitutional selective prosecution in
retaliation for speech in violation of the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States
Constitution

@RabbiArielSton1 can you help me. i was concerned about the safety and well being of a person, who was alleged to have right leaning tendencies. in my concern, i reached out. his patterns escalated, and now i am constantly bullied with swastika imagery from antifa.

i have been a long term campaigner against nazi-ism in portland---and young antifa, refuse to research my work. due to my interest in de-radicalising someone, i am bullied by people like @realfrostylady who seek to punish me with brutal swastika imagery.

every time, careless antifa, blast my account with this horrifying image of swastikas, i feel persecuted, and they do not respect the way that it traumatic to me, to do this work, and have no respect. i have tried to educate on holocaust. worked at museum, read huge amounts.

my Jewish ancestry is less provable than many, and i have sincerely believed i have little bits of Jewish due to stories, and names. but does it matter? if i feel in my heart, connected to that pain, why must they brutally inflict more trauma on me. my loved ones from israel...

my loved ones from israel, are separated from me, and it was perhaps an original hate crime against me, that antifa seek to abuse me with further. perhaps it was to punish my many jewish friends, or past lovers. can you ask them to stop. the people involved with torturing me

All filings, including case initiating documents, may be submitted as PDF attachments to an
e-mail addressed to [email protected]. Documents e-mailed to other court email addresses will not be accepted for filing and will receive no response.

Failure to use the
correct e-mail address may result in revocation or restriction of e-mail filing privileges.

• All filings must include a case caption page that complies with Local Rule 10.
• The filing must be signed with s/ [filer's name] or bear a scanned handwritten signature.
• The e-mail must contain the party's name, address, and phone number.

For existing cases, the e-mail's subject line must state: Pro Se Filing [Insert Your Case
Number]. For new cases, the e-mail's subject line must state: Pro Se Filing in New Case.

• E-mails and filings that do not comply with these requirements will not be filed, and the
Court will request a revision that complies with this Order.

1/ #CapitolRiots fueled by #AlexJones’ propaganda.

Alex Jones paid $500K organize the event, admits he was directed by #Trump to lead the crowd to the Capitol.

.@FBI Pls Investigate Free Speech System’s & Trump’s communications, donors & pre-election funding of infowars.

2/ .@FBI please investigate. My kids were taken away for countermanding defamation & because I spoke out against infowars, which I used to own. Pls investigate due process violations in D-1-FM-15-005030 & official oppression to silence anti-Trump speech.

3/.@fbi investigate why Alex Jones’ DUI charge was dismissed w out trial and all Travis Co rulings to protect him, investigations not pursued by DA and (indicted) AG for racketeering, perjury. Investigate $6500 donation to judge prior to order entry...

4/Flashback to three weeks ago.

.@FBI whatcha waiting for?

Hey, .@SecretService

Active calls to more violence on Alex Jones’ “Banned Video” website.

Thought they moderated comments.
.@FBI

All filings, including case initiating documents, may be submitted as PDF attachments to an
e-mail addressed to [email protected]. Documents e-mailed to other court email addresses will not be accepted for filing and will receive no response.

Failure to use the
correct e-mail address may result in revocation or restriction of e-mail filing privileges.

• All filings must include a case caption page that complies with Local Rule 10.
• The filing must be signed with s/ [filer's name] or bear a scanned handwritten signature.
• The e-mail must contain the party's name, address, and phone number.

For existing cases, the e-mail's subject line must state: Pro Se Filing [Insert Your Case
Number]. For new cases, the e-mail's subject line must state: Pro Se Filing in New Case.

• E-mails and filings that do not comply with these requirements will not be filed, and the
Court will request a revision that complies with this Order.

A Supreme Court bench headed by CJI SA Bobde is hearing a PIL seeking the direction for the Ministry of Home Affairs, Law and Justice and Women and Child Development to make all the personal laws uniform.

Senior Adv. Pinky Anand is appearing for the Petitioners followed by Meenakshi Arora.
The plea seeks the removal of personal laws as they are discriminatory under Art. 14,15 and other provisions of International Covenants.

CJI: You want the abolishment of Personal Laws?
Pinky Anand: No
CJI: You are not saying it doesn't mean that's not the reality.

"You are asking us to encroach upon personal laws and remove the distinction that they create." CJI said.

Pinky Anand refers to the cases of Shayara Bano and Sarala Mudgal to argue that Courts on earlier occasions have struck down laws and gave directions for practices found to be unconstitutional.

Today is the last working day of the Supreme Court for the year 2020.
 
In a year of many unprecedented events, the Supreme Court has laid down many precedents, in more than one sense of the term. 

My list of the notables, but not necessarily in order of notability, is here👇

1. In re. problems and miseries of migrant workers: A petition seeking help for migrant workers affected by the COVID lockdown had been disposed off. Then the Court suo moto took up the miseries of workers and sought to oversee the facilities for the migrant workers.

2. Government passed orders directing employers to not stop paying wages to workers. Employers challenged this In Ficus pax v. Union of India. Supreme Court directed employers to negotiate with employees.

3. In a decision having bearing upon its own administration, in Chief Information Commissioner v. HC of Gujarat and Anr. the court held that where HC rules provide for a procedure to obtain certified copies, same cannot be obtained by RTI.

4. The 2013 Land Acquisition Act resulted in lapse of some acquisition proceedings under the old 1894 Act. 5 judges in Indore Development Authority v. Manoharlal clarified that proceedings will not lapse either compensation has been paid or physical possession has been taken.