~ Julian Barnes
"I don't believe in God, but I miss him."
~ Julian Barnes 💎 #Botd 1946
~ Julian Barnes
~ Julian Barnes
~ Julian Barnes
~ Julian Barnes
~ Julian Barnes
~ Julian Barnes
~ Julian Barnes
~ Julian Barnes
~ Julian Barnes
More from Celebrities
Britney Spears’ boyfriend, Sam Asghari, is speaking out in support of the pop star following the release of the FX documentary about her.
@NardineSaad reports
Asghari gave his support to Spears and was bluntly disparaging her father.
He said he has “zero respect” for the elder Spears, who has a court-approved conservatorship over the singer.
“Now it’s important for people to understand that I have zero respect for someone trying to control our relationship and constantly throwing obstacles our way,” he said on social media.
That's not all he said...
https://t.co/7QTq0nvMFr
Lawyers for Jamie Spears did not immediately respond to The Times’ requests for comment Tuesday.
Meanwhile, here's the story behind the couple, including how they met and social media posts they released
https://t.co/7QTq0nvMFr
Here's why Britney Spears doesn't appear in the new FX documentary about the conservatorship and the #FreeBritney movement
@NardineSaad reports
Asghari gave his support to Spears and was bluntly disparaging her father.
He said he has “zero respect” for the elder Spears, who has a court-approved conservatorship over the singer.
“Now it’s important for people to understand that I have zero respect for someone trying to control our relationship and constantly throwing obstacles our way,” he said on social media.
That's not all he said...
https://t.co/7QTq0nvMFr
Lawyers for Jamie Spears did not immediately respond to The Times’ requests for comment Tuesday.
Meanwhile, here's the story behind the couple, including how they met and social media posts they released
https://t.co/7QTq0nvMFr
Here's why Britney Spears doesn't appear in the new FX documentary about the conservatorship and the #FreeBritney movement
You May Also Like
A brief analysis and comparison of the CSS for Twitter's PWA vs Twitter's legacy desktop website. The difference is dramatic and I'll touch on some reasons why.
Legacy site *downloads* ~630 KB CSS per theme and writing direction.
6,769 rules
9,252 selectors
16.7k declarations
3,370 unique declarations
44 media queries
36 unique colors
50 unique background colors
46 unique font sizes
39 unique z-indices
https://t.co/qyl4Bt1i5x
PWA *incrementally generates* ~30 KB CSS that handles all themes and writing directions.
735 rules
740 selectors
757 declarations
730 unique declarations
0 media queries
11 unique colors
32 unique background colors
15 unique font sizes
7 unique z-indices
https://t.co/w7oNG5KUkJ
The legacy site's CSS is what happens when hundreds of people directly write CSS over many years. Specificity wars, redundancy, a house of cards that can't be fixed. The result is extremely inefficient and error-prone styling that punishes users and developers.
The PWA's CSS is generated on-demand by a JS framework that manages styles and outputs "atomic CSS". The framework can enforce strict constraints and perform optimisations, which is why the CSS is so much smaller and safer. Style conflicts and unbounded CSS growth are avoided.
Legacy site *downloads* ~630 KB CSS per theme and writing direction.
6,769 rules
9,252 selectors
16.7k declarations
3,370 unique declarations
44 media queries
36 unique colors
50 unique background colors
46 unique font sizes
39 unique z-indices
https://t.co/qyl4Bt1i5x
PWA *incrementally generates* ~30 KB CSS that handles all themes and writing directions.
735 rules
740 selectors
757 declarations
730 unique declarations
0 media queries
11 unique colors
32 unique background colors
15 unique font sizes
7 unique z-indices
https://t.co/w7oNG5KUkJ
The legacy site's CSS is what happens when hundreds of people directly write CSS over many years. Specificity wars, redundancy, a house of cards that can't be fixed. The result is extremely inefficient and error-prone styling that punishes users and developers.
The PWA's CSS is generated on-demand by a JS framework that manages styles and outputs "atomic CSS". The framework can enforce strict constraints and perform optimisations, which is why the CSS is so much smaller and safer. Style conflicts and unbounded CSS growth are avoided.