~ Julian Barnes
"I don't believe in God, but I miss him."
~ Julian Barnes 💎 #Botd 1946
~ Julian Barnes
~ Julian Barnes
~ Julian Barnes
~ Julian Barnes
~ Julian Barnes
~ Julian Barnes
~ Julian Barnes
~ Julian Barnes
~ Julian Barnes
More from Celebrities
Britney Spears’ boyfriend, Sam Asghari, is speaking out in support of the pop star following the release of the FX documentary about her.
@NardineSaad reports
Asghari gave his support to Spears and was bluntly disparaging her father.
He said he has “zero respect” for the elder Spears, who has a court-approved conservatorship over the singer.
“Now it’s important for people to understand that I have zero respect for someone trying to control our relationship and constantly throwing obstacles our way,” he said on social media.
That's not all he said...
https://t.co/7QTq0nvMFr
Lawyers for Jamie Spears did not immediately respond to The Times’ requests for comment Tuesday.
Meanwhile, here's the story behind the couple, including how they met and social media posts they released
https://t.co/7QTq0nvMFr
Here's why Britney Spears doesn't appear in the new FX documentary about the conservatorship and the #FreeBritney movement
@NardineSaad reports
Asghari gave his support to Spears and was bluntly disparaging her father.
He said he has “zero respect” for the elder Spears, who has a court-approved conservatorship over the singer.
“Now it’s important for people to understand that I have zero respect for someone trying to control our relationship and constantly throwing obstacles our way,” he said on social media.
That's not all he said...
https://t.co/7QTq0nvMFr
Lawyers for Jamie Spears did not immediately respond to The Times’ requests for comment Tuesday.
Meanwhile, here's the story behind the couple, including how they met and social media posts they released
https://t.co/7QTq0nvMFr
Here's why Britney Spears doesn't appear in the new FX documentary about the conservatorship and the #FreeBritney movement
You May Also Like
I just finished Eric Adler's The Battle of the Classics, and wanted to say something about Joel Christiansen's review linked below. I am not sure what motivates the review (I speculate a bit below), but it gives a very misleading impression of the book. 1/x
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x
As someone\u2019s who\u2019s read the book, this review strikes me as tremendously unfair. It mostly faults Adler for not writing the book the reviewer wishes he had! https://t.co/pqpt5Ziivj
— Teresa M. Bejan (@tmbejan) January 12, 2021
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x