Imagine going against a belief held by EVERYONE.
Everyone telling you that if you did this thing, your body would break down...
and doing it anyway.
YOU VS THE WORLD (THREAD)
Let me tell you a story about Sir Roger Bannister.
He was the first man to run a mile in under four minutes
Before Sir Roger, it was the mainstream GLOBAL belief that it was IMPOSSIBLE for the human body to sustain such speeds without breaking down ..
Imagine going against a belief held by EVERYONE.
Everyone telling you that if you did this thing, your body would break down...
and doing it anyway.
It is impossible. You're crazy to even try!"
The 'experts' believed that the record could only be broken on a day with no wind, at 20 Celsius, on a hard dry clay track in front of a huge cheering crowd;
Ideal conditions.
It was cold, the track was wet, and there were only 3000 people in the the Iffley Road crowd.
Bannister had rested for five days before because he’d reached his peak, both physically and psychologically.
Bannister began his last lap with a time of 3.07. He needed to do the last one in 59 seconds.
He flew past Chataway onto the last straight. He knew this was it.
The world stood still.
Bannister had finished in 3:59.4
He’d done it.
He’d broken the world record
He’d done what so many believed was impossible.
So what's the lesson here?
if you feel it in your heart of hearts? - you have the absolute capacity to achieve the 'impossible'
Once the limiting belief was gone - many people broke the time. Once the spell was broken, people could be free.
If you aren't ever exposed to new realities or examples of whats possible, then its a lot harder to see what actually CAN be done.
The company you keep + your environment has a huge effect on you - through osmosis
Hundreds of other people like you who are all working as one to break free from the limits they place on themselves.
Doing everything possible to no longer be just a number in the matrix.
Exclusive webinars, lectures and content from industry leaders you won't see anywhere else.
A private community where you can share - unfiltered.
Join the movement here: https://t.co/TaKbtnmfNE
More from Celebrities
Britney Spears’ boyfriend, Sam Asghari, is speaking out in support of the pop star following the release of the FX documentary about her.
@NardineSaad reports
Asghari gave his support to Spears and was bluntly disparaging her father.
He said he has “zero respect” for the elder Spears, who has a court-approved conservatorship over the singer.
“Now it’s important for people to understand that I have zero respect for someone trying to control our relationship and constantly throwing obstacles our way,” he said on social media.
That's not all he said...
https://t.co/7QTq0nvMFr
Lawyers for Jamie Spears did not immediately respond to The Times’ requests for comment Tuesday.
Meanwhile, here's the story behind the couple, including how they met and social media posts they released
https://t.co/7QTq0nvMFr
Here's why Britney Spears doesn't appear in the new FX documentary about the conservatorship and the #FreeBritney movement
@NardineSaad reports
Asghari gave his support to Spears and was bluntly disparaging her father.
He said he has “zero respect” for the elder Spears, who has a court-approved conservatorship over the singer.
“Now it’s important for people to understand that I have zero respect for someone trying to control our relationship and constantly throwing obstacles our way,” he said on social media.
That's not all he said...
https://t.co/7QTq0nvMFr
Lawyers for Jamie Spears did not immediately respond to The Times’ requests for comment Tuesday.
Meanwhile, here's the story behind the couple, including how they met and social media posts they released
https://t.co/7QTq0nvMFr
Here's why Britney Spears doesn't appear in the new FX documentary about the conservatorship and the #FreeBritney movement
You May Also Like
The entire discussion around Facebook’s disclosures of what happened in 2016 is very frustrating. No exec stopped any investigations, but there were a lot of heated discussions about what to publish and when.
In the spring and summer of 2016, as reported by the Times, activity we traced to GRU was reported to the FBI. This was the standard model of interaction companies used for nation-state attacks against likely US targeted.
In the Spring of 2017, after a deep dive into the Fake News phenomena, the security team wanted to publish an update that covered what we had learned. At this point, we didn’t have any advertising content or the big IRA cluster, but we did know about the GRU model.
This report when through dozens of edits as different equities were represented. I did not have any meetings with Sheryl on the paper, but I can’t speak to whether she was in the loop with my higher-ups.
In the end, the difficult question of attribution was settled by us pointing to the DNI report instead of saying Russia or GRU directly. In my pre-briefs with members of Congress, I made it clear that we believed this action was GRU.
The story doesn\u2019t say you were told not to... it says you did so without approval and they tried to obfuscate what you found. Is that true?
— Sarah Frier (@sarahfrier) November 15, 2018
In the spring and summer of 2016, as reported by the Times, activity we traced to GRU was reported to the FBI. This was the standard model of interaction companies used for nation-state attacks against likely US targeted.
In the Spring of 2017, after a deep dive into the Fake News phenomena, the security team wanted to publish an update that covered what we had learned. At this point, we didn’t have any advertising content or the big IRA cluster, but we did know about the GRU model.
This report when through dozens of edits as different equities were represented. I did not have any meetings with Sheryl on the paper, but I can’t speak to whether she was in the loop with my higher-ups.
In the end, the difficult question of attribution was settled by us pointing to the DNI report instead of saying Russia or GRU directly. In my pre-briefs with members of Congress, I made it clear that we believed this action was GRU.
