More from Intrinsic Compounding
More from Cdsl
Objective is to move higher towards
3.618%(1287)
4.236%(1476)
4.618%(1593)
#Probability^^^
#CDSL -1050
— MaRkET WaVES (DINESH PATEL ) Stock Market FARMER (@idineshptl) July 9, 2021
Now above 2.618% and objective is to move higher towards 3.618%
4.236% and 4.618%....
What will Drag lower this stock price \U0001f602 ?
Only if you can sell your holding
Means Verticle rise ?
Than why it decline from (486-180.)#Observation #Perspective pic.twitter.com/evxYOjH8Qv
CDSL
CMP: 1258.55
One of my long term PORTFOLIO STOCK is getting ready for the next phase.
Will be a good point to add more quantity. https://t.co/KaidnjSWpY
A lot of friends ask for stocks that they can invest for next 5 years. I personally believe and personally invested into
— TECHVESTOR (@AshrafZaman3) May 23, 2021
1. IEX
2 CDSL
3. IRCTC
4. NAZARA TECHNOLOGIES
Please do not take this as an investment recommendation. Also my entry price is lower.#investing pic.twitter.com/vKBLV9u4mL
You May Also Like
Imagine for a moment the most obscurantist, jargon-filled, po-mo article the politically correct academy might produce. Pure SJW nonsense. Got it? Chances are you're imagining something like the infamous "Feminist Glaciology" article from a few years back.https://t.co/NRaWNREBvR pic.twitter.com/qtSFBYY80S
— Jeffrey Sachs (@JeffreyASachs) October 13, 2018
The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.
Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)
There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.
At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?