I told you guys it was the tip of the iceberg, and Republicans would regret making comments. The reporting is finally catching up with the breadth of the scandal. Still, folks in the media don't want to go there entirely yet because the truth will tear this country apart.
More from Category
“Most secure election in US history...” Chris Krebs - Former United States Director of the Cybersecurity & Infrastructure Security Agency
Meanwhile Fulton County just hired top criminal defense attorneys to stop a civil lawsuit that recently unsealed ballots for forensic audit.
Meanwhile Fulton County just hired top criminal defense attorneys to stop a civil lawsuit that recently unsealed ballots for forensic audit.
GEORGIA! \U0001f6a8 @GaSecofState sent a letter to Congress on Jan 6th refuting claims of election fraud in GA asserting his office had thoroughly investigated. He now admits that transfer documents compromising hundreds of thousands of ballots in Fulton County are missing. @RealAmVoice https://t.co/w34gBN0Woq pic.twitter.com/TWmroCuJ7N
— Heather Mullins - Real America\u2019s Voice (RAV-TV) (@TalkMullins) June 15, 2021
You May Also Like
"I lied about my basic beliefs in order to keep a prestigious job. Now that it will be zero-cost to me, I have a few things to say."
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".
As a dean of a major academic institution, I could not have said this. But I will now. Requiring such statements in applications for appointments and promotions is an affront to academic freedom, and diminishes the true value of diversity, equity of inclusion by trivializing it. https://t.co/NfcI5VLODi
— Jeffrey Flier (@jflier) November 10, 2018
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".