I am reading seed catalogs in the morning sun. A thread. ЁЯМ╗ЁЯежЁЯМ╜ЁЯНЕЁЯНЖЁЯеФЁЯеТ

Seed catalogs are good reading my friends. The best ones are little glimpse into possibilities emerging. Of course there's the possibility of your amazing next season garden. But also the possibility of change in the world.
Especially this is true for the companies with social missions, like worker-owned Johnny's or FEDCO. Both are more than 40 years old, part of the organic movement, the local food movement, and trusted providers of good seed and good advice in the northeast US.
Seed catalogs can be a connection to the past and to the future, especially the ones, like my favorites, that also encourage seed saving by offering open pollinated varieties, and tell the stories of some seeds origins.
They also reflect what's changing in the society. And there's a lot that is inspiring in my morning reading even before you get to the luscious tomatoes or the bright green peas and all the promises of the next growing season.
Women farmers are featured throughout. Both as seed growers and as featured customers. Diverse farms, speciality crops, all sorts of models. When I was a little girl who liked to look at seed catalogs, they didn't look like this. (yes I was *that* kind of little girl)
Then there's stories about communities responding to covid by growing and sharing more food and the ways these social mission seed companies have tried to help.
There are new structures emerging. FEDCO has a little blurb about a project that organized in March, all volunteer, that delivered free seed to 10,000 gardeners at cooperative gardens. Those are connections I expect will last long beyond COVID.
There are signs of growing accountability. FEDCO writes about their Indigenous royalties program. Some of the varieties are marked with a symbol that means they are seeds stewarded by an Indigenous tribe. A % of the price is passed back to the appropriate tribe.
That's not a panacea and there maybe further to go, but it feels like a start.
In FEDCO there's a note from a reader suggesting that the General Lee cucumber be renamed after someone who isn't a white supremacist icon. The company's response: we are looking for a new variety with the same properties to replace this one. Confederate cucumbers are falling
I know covid is raging and democracy is under attack and the climate is changing and these seed companies are probably not perfect either. But we shouldn't loose sight. People are trying. Experiments are happening. Connections are forging.
Seeds both literal and figurative are sprouting.
Seed catalogs may not be your thing. But I'm willing to bet, whatever your thing is, below the surface or out in plain sight, there are new models being tried out, hard history being looked at, and baby steps being taken.
Each and everyone one of those is place that could probably use your dollars, your excitement, your time. Knitters for racial equity. Romance novelists for environmental justice. Bakers for food sovereignty. I don't know where but I trust it's out there.
Well there's my Sunday morning thoughts, for whatever they are worth. Time for a fresh cup of tea and to narrow down this list of cantaloupe varieties. ЁЯНИЁЯНЕЁЯеХЁЯМ╜ЁЯеж

More from Book

рджреЛрди рд╡рд░реНрд╖рд╛рдВрдкреВрд░реНрд╡реА рдЬреЗрд╡реНрд╣рд╛ рдореА тАШрд▓реАрди рдЗрдитАЩ рд╣реЗ рдкреБрд╕реНрддрдХ рд╡рд╛рдЪрд▓реЗ рд╣реЛрддреЗ рддреЗрд╡реНрд╣рд╛ рдорд▓рд╛ рдХрдзреАрдЪ рд╡рд╛рдЯрд▓реЗ рдирд╡реНрд╣рддреЗ рдХреА рд╣реНрдпрд╛ рдкреБрд╕реНрддрдХрд╛рдЪрд╛ рдорд╛рдЭреНрдпрд╛рд╡рд░ рдХрд╛рдпрдордЪрд╛ рдкрд░рд┐рдгрд╛рдо рд╣реЛрдИрд▓.
тАЬрдЦрд░реЛрдЦрд░ рд╕рдорд╛рди рдЬрдЧ рдЕрд╕реЗ рдЖрд╣реЗ рдХреА рдЬреЗрдереЗ рдорд╣рд┐рд▓рд╛рдВрдиреА рдЖрдкрд▓реЗ рдЕрд░реНрдзреЗ рджреЗрд╢ рдЖрдгрд┐ рдХрдВрдкрдиреНрдпрд╛ рдЖрдгрд┐ рдкреБрд░реБрд╖рд╛рдВрдиреА рдЕрд░реНрдзреА рдШрд░рдВ рдЪрд╛рд▓рд╡рддреАрд▓. тАЬ
- рд╢реЗрд░рд┐рд▓ рд╕рдБрдбрдмрд░реНрдЧ.


рдЕрдзреНрдпрд╛рдп рд╡рд╛рдЪрддрд╛рдирд╛ рдорд▓рд╛ рдЬрд╛рдгрд╡рд▓рдВ рдХреА рдкреНрд░рддреНрдпреЗрдХ рдорд╣рд┐рд▓рд╛ рдЬрд┐рд▓рд╛ рддрд┐рдЪреНрдпрд╛ рдЖрд╡рдбреАрдирд┐рд╡рдбреАрдВрд╢реА рдХреЛрдгрддреАрд╣реА рддрдбрдЬреЛрдб рди рдХрд░рддрд╛ рд╕реНрд╡рдд: рдЪреЗ рдХрд░рд┐рдпрд░ рдмрдирд╡рд╛рдпрдЪреЗ рдЖрд╣реЗ, рддрд┐рдЪреНрдпрд╛рд╕рд╛рдареА рд╣рд╛ manifesto рдЖрд╣реЗ. рдпрд╛ рд╡рд╛рд╕реНрддрд╡рд╡рд╛рджреА рдкреБрд╕реНрддрдХрд╛рдЪреА рд▓реЗрдЦрд┐рдХрд╛ рд╢реЗрд░рд┐рд▓ рд╕рдБрдбрдмрд░реНрдЧ рдЖрд╣реЗ. рдкреНрд░рд╛рдорд╛рдгрд┐рдХ рдмреЛрд▓рдВ рддрд░ рдореА рддреНрдпрд╛рд╡реЗрд│реА рддрд┐рдЪрдВ рдирд╛рд╡ рдХрдзреАрдЪ рдРрдХрд▓реЗ рдирд╡реНрд╣рддреЗ.


рдХрд╛рд╣реА рдЦреБрд▓рд╛рд╕реЗ рдХрд░рдгрд╛рд░реЗ рддрдереНрдп рд╢реЛрдзрд▓реНрдпрд╛рдирдВрддрд░ рдореА рддрд┐рдЪреНрдпрд╛ рд╕рдВрджрд░реНрднрд╛рдд рдЕрдзрд┐рдХ рдорд╛рд╣рд┐рддреАрд╕рд╛рдареА рдереЛрдбрд╛ рдЗрдВрдЯрд░рдиреЗрдЯ рд╕рд░реНрдл рдХреЗрд▓рдВ. рд╣рд╛рд░реНрд╡рд░реНрдбрдордзреВрди рдЗрдХреЙрдиреЙрдорд┐рдХреНрд╕рдЪреА рдкрджрд╡реА рдШреЗрддрд▓реА рд╡ рдкрджрд╡реА рдкреВрд░реНрдг рдЭрд╛рд▓реНрдпрд╛рд╡рд░ рддрд┐рд▓рд╛ рдХреЙрд▓реЗрдЬрдордзреНрдпреЗ рд╡реБрдорди рдЗрди рдЗрдХреЙрдиреЙрдорд┐рдХреНрд╕ рдирд╛рд╡рд╛рдЪреА рдПрдХ рд╕рдВрд╕реНрдерд╛ рд╕реНрдерд╛рдкрд┐рдд рдХреЗрд▓реА. рдПрдХрд╛ рд╡рд░реНрд╖рд╛рд╕рд╛рдареА рд╡рд░реНрд▓реНрдб рдмрдБрдХреЗрдд рдХрд╛рдо рдХреЗрд▓реЗ рдЖрдгрд┐ рдХреБрд╖реНрдард░реЛрдЧрд╛рд╕ рдЖрд│рд╛


рдШрд╛рд▓рдгреНрдпрд╛рдЪреНрдпрд╛ рдПрдХрд╛ рдХрд╛рд░реНрдпрдХреНрд░рдорд╛рдЕрдВрддрд░реНрдЧрдд рддреНрдпрд╛рдВрдиреА рднрд╛рд░рддрд╛рддрд╣реА рдкреНрд░рд╡рд╛рд╕ рдХреЗрд▓рд╛. рдирдВрддрд░ рд╣рд╛рд░реНрд╡рд░реНрдб рдпреЗрдереЗ рдПрдордмреАрдП рдХреЗрд▓реЗ рдЖрдгрд┐ рд╡рд░реНрд╖рднрд░ рдореЕрдХрдХрд┐рдиреНрд╕реЗ рдЖрдгрд┐ рдХрдВрдкрдиреАрдмрд░реЛрдмрд░ рдХрд╛рдо рдХреЗрд▓реЗ. рдорд╛рдЭреНрдпрд╛рд╕рд╛рд░рдЦреНрдпрд╛ рднрд╛рд░рддреАрдп рдорд╣рд┐рд▓реЗрд╕рд╛рдареА, рддрд┐рдиреЗ рдЖрдкрд▓реНрдпрд╛ рдкреБрд╕реНрддрдХрд╛рдд рд▓рд┐рд╣реВрди рджрд┐рд▓реЗрд▓реНрдпрд╛ рдХрд╛рдорд╛рдЪреНрдпрд╛ рдард┐рдХрд╛рдгреА рдорд╣рд┐рд▓рд╛рдВрдЪреНрдпрд╛ рд╡рд╛рдЧрдгреБрдХреАрдЪреНрдпрд╛ рд╕рд╛рдзреНрдпрд╛ рд╕рд╛рдзреНрдпрд╛ рдирд┐рд░реАрдХреНрд╖рдгрд╛рджреНрд╡рд╛рд░реЗ

рдирд┐рд╢реНрдЪрд┐рддрдЪ рдПрдХ рдЖрджрд░реНрд╢ рдореНрд╣рдгреВрди рдХрд╛рдо рдХреЗрд▓реЗ. рдорд▓рд╛ рд╡реИрдпрдХреНрддрд┐рдХрд░рд┐рддреНрдпрд╛ рдХрд│рд▓реЗ рдХреА рдкреБрд╕реНрддрдХрд╛рдд рдиреЛрдВрджрд╡рд▓реЗрд▓реНрдпрд╛ рдмрд░реНтАНрдпрд╛рдЪ рдЕрдЬреНрдЮрд╛рдд, рдирдХрд│рдд рд╡рд░реНрддрди рддрдереНрдп рд╕рддреНрдп рдЖрд╣реЗрдд. рддреНрдпрд╛рдкреИрдХреА рдХрд╛рд╣реАрдВрдЪрд╛ рд╕рдорд╛рд╡реЗрд╢ рдЖрд╣реЗ рдХреА рдорд╣рд┐рд▓рд╛ рдЬреНрдпрд╛ рдкреНрд░рдХрд▓реНрдкрд╛рдд рдХрд╛рдо рдХрд░рддрд╛рдд рддреНрдпрд╛ рдХреЛрдгрддреНрдпрд╛рд╣реА рдкреНрд░рдХрд▓реНрдкрд╛рдд рдкреБрдврд╛рдХрд╛рд░ рдЕрд░реНрдерд╛рдд initiative рдШреЗрдд рдирд╛рд╣реАрдд,

You May Also Like

This is a pretty valiant attempt to defend the "Feminist Glaciology" article, which says conventional wisdom is wrong, and this is a solid piece of scholarship. I'll beg to differ, because I think Jeffery, here, is confusing scholarship with "saying things that seem right".


The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.


Also a "man" thingтАФphysical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)


There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.


At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?