@dmuthuk @unseenvalue @nishkumar1977 @connectgurmeet @ishmohit1 if you find it useful, kindly like or RT so that it reaches the wider audience.
My daughter has just finished reading 'Atomic Habits' and I have started to observe a few changes in her behavior, most notably, she is now better prepared for Sat 7AM swim session. Her swim bag and costume are right by her bedside the night before. I was impressed by this tiny
@dmuthuk @unseenvalue @nishkumar1977 @connectgurmeet @ishmohit1 if you find it useful, kindly like or RT so that it reaches the wider audience.
Lesson 1: Tiny changes lead to big improvements
“Atomic habits” is all about showing how small and seemingly unimportant changes and adjustments can lead to a massive
When we repeat 1% improvement, day after day, our small choices compound into significant improvements.
Success is the product of daily habits, not once-in-a-lifetime transformations.
After the 2nd world war, Japan started using a philosophy called ‘Kaizen’ that seeks to achieve small, incremental improvements in processes in order to improve efficiency and quality in personal or professional life.
These small incremental changes add
Essence to building a new habit or bringing in improvement in any areas in your personal/professional life is to
‘Start with the smallest and practice the easiest’.
We now know that all big things come from small beginnings and the seed of every habit is a single tiny decision.
If this is so simple, how is it that a lot of people find it difficult to build a habit? Answer lies in the fact that
Lesson 3: Forget about the goal & focus on the system instead
Goals are the results you
The main problem with goal driven behavior is that it tends to ignore the process of getting there and just concentrates on getting the final outcome.
If you want 6 pack abs, concentrate on
Winners and losers have the same goals; every Olympian wants to win a gold medal so it can’t be the goal that actually differentiates people.
Lesson 4: Transition from outcome-based habits to identity-based habits
“There are three layers of behavior change:
1. a change in your outcomes 2. a change in your processes or 3. a change in your identity.”
“Outcomes are about what you get. Processes are about what you do. Identity is about what you believe.”
With outcome based habits, focus is on what you want to achieve.
You may start a habit because of motivation, but the only reason you’ll stick with one is when it becomes part of your identity.
Ultimate form of intrinsic motivation is when a habit becomes part of our identity
When your behavior and identity are fully aligned, you are no longer pursuing behavior change. You are simply acting like the type of person you already believe yourself to be.
20. If you plan to run a marathon, you goal is not to run 26.2 miles but to become a runner, and being a runner is who you are, that’s your identity.
Every time you write a page, you are a writer.
Every time you start a workout, you are an athlete.
Becoming the best version of yourself requires you to start with the kind of person you want to become and
Lesson 5: How to build good habits & break bad habits:
The process of building a good habit can be divided into four steps:
1. Cue : Make it obvious
Cue triggers the brain to initiate an action, it is a bit of
2. Craving: Make it attractive
Craving is the motivational force behind every habit, without craving for a change - we have no reason to act
3. Response: Make it Easy
Response is the action or habit that we perform.
4. Reward: Make it satisfying
How to Break a Bad Habit:
Inversion of
. 1st Law (Cue): Make it Invisible.
· 2nd Law (Craving): Make it Unattractive.
· 3rd Law (Response): Make it Difficult.
· 4th Law (Reward): Make it Unsatisfying.
If you repeat this behaviour enough, watching Netflix or social media will become your natural response to boredom
All four steps are required to build any habit. Eliminate the cue and habit will never start.
- If you can’t focus on work, leave your phone in another room for a few hours
- If you are wasting too much time watching television, move the TV out of your bedroom
- If you are eating chocolate & other sweets food at home, don’t sweets at home.
This way you will make the cue invisible Without Cue, there will be no craving, and getting out of the home to buy chocolates makes it unattractive and mostly unsatisfying.
- If you want to go to the gym in the morning, prepare your clothes and shoes the night before and keep them next to your bed.
In order to create a new habit, we can take exercising, it’s better to go 3 times a week to the gym for a 10 minutes exercise than to go only once for a one hour exercise.
We will naturally gravitate toward the option that requires the least amount of work. Reduce the friction associated with good behaviors. When friction is low, habits are easy.
Lesson 7: How to Stop Procrastinating by Using the Two-Minute Rule
‘When you start a new habit, it should take less than two minutes to do.’
More from Books
40 Investing Books Recommendations from 20 Legendary Investors
Including Warren Buffett, Charlie Munger, Joel Greenblatt, Mohnish Pabrai, Guy Spier, Li Lu.......
Worth More than $100 Billion!
1. Warren Buffett
The Most Important Thing - https://t.co/9noBa9TIYk
The Outsider -
2. Charlie Munger
Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion - https://t.co/UnBFJ90J9o
The Warren Buffett Portfolio -
3. Mohnish Pabrai
100 Baggers - https://t.co/CrIt3kJlaF
A Gift to My Children: A Father’s Lessons for Life and Investing -
4. Chris Mayer
The Little Book That Beats the Market. - https://t.co/7NEKHgNCSD
100 to 1 in the Stock Market by Thomas Phelps -
Including Warren Buffett, Charlie Munger, Joel Greenblatt, Mohnish Pabrai, Guy Spier, Li Lu.......
Worth More than $100 Billion!
1. Warren Buffett
The Most Important Thing - https://t.co/9noBa9TIYk
The Outsider -
2. Charlie Munger
Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion - https://t.co/UnBFJ90J9o
The Warren Buffett Portfolio -
3. Mohnish Pabrai
100 Baggers - https://t.co/CrIt3kJlaF
A Gift to My Children: A Father’s Lessons for Life and Investing -
4. Chris Mayer
The Little Book That Beats the Market. - https://t.co/7NEKHgNCSD
100 to 1 in the Stock Market by Thomas Phelps -
You May Also Like
I just finished Eric Adler's The Battle of the Classics, and wanted to say something about Joel Christiansen's review linked below. I am not sure what motivates the review (I speculate a bit below), but it gives a very misleading impression of the book. 1/x
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x
As someone\u2019s who\u2019s read the book, this review strikes me as tremendously unfair. It mostly faults Adler for not writing the book the reviewer wishes he had! https://t.co/pqpt5Ziivj
— Teresa M. Bejan (@tmbejan) January 12, 2021
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x
The entire discussion around Facebook’s disclosures of what happened in 2016 is very frustrating. No exec stopped any investigations, but there were a lot of heated discussions about what to publish and when.
In the spring and summer of 2016, as reported by the Times, activity we traced to GRU was reported to the FBI. This was the standard model of interaction companies used for nation-state attacks against likely US targeted.
In the Spring of 2017, after a deep dive into the Fake News phenomena, the security team wanted to publish an update that covered what we had learned. At this point, we didn’t have any advertising content or the big IRA cluster, but we did know about the GRU model.
This report when through dozens of edits as different equities were represented. I did not have any meetings with Sheryl on the paper, but I can’t speak to whether she was in the loop with my higher-ups.
In the end, the difficult question of attribution was settled by us pointing to the DNI report instead of saying Russia or GRU directly. In my pre-briefs with members of Congress, I made it clear that we believed this action was GRU.
The story doesn\u2019t say you were told not to... it says you did so without approval and they tried to obfuscate what you found. Is that true?
— Sarah Frier (@sarahfrier) November 15, 2018
In the spring and summer of 2016, as reported by the Times, activity we traced to GRU was reported to the FBI. This was the standard model of interaction companies used for nation-state attacks against likely US targeted.
In the Spring of 2017, after a deep dive into the Fake News phenomena, the security team wanted to publish an update that covered what we had learned. At this point, we didn’t have any advertising content or the big IRA cluster, but we did know about the GRU model.
This report when through dozens of edits as different equities were represented. I did not have any meetings with Sheryl on the paper, but I can’t speak to whether she was in the loop with my higher-ups.
In the end, the difficult question of attribution was settled by us pointing to the DNI report instead of saying Russia or GRU directly. In my pre-briefs with members of Congress, I made it clear that we believed this action was GRU.