THREAD
1/3
An investigation has revealed that Bill Gates has owned major shares in Pfizer since 2002.

He then “coincidentally” bought major shares in BioNTech in September 2019…

2/3
He is also the Primary Funder of the MHRA with a current $3 million investment.
In the clinical trial on children 86% suffered an adverse reaction to the Pfizer / BioNTech jab ranging from mild to extremely serious…
3/3

But the MHRA still gave emergency use authorisation for the Pfizer / BioNTech jab to be given to children.

That decision just made Bill Gates shares boom and means the MHRA can keep Bill Gates funding.

https://t.co/CVKsdXwDbt

You May Also Like

This is a pretty valiant attempt to defend the "Feminist Glaciology" article, which says conventional wisdom is wrong, and this is a solid piece of scholarship. I'll beg to differ, because I think Jeffery, here, is confusing scholarship with "saying things that seem right".


The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.


Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)


There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.


At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?