#BANKNIFTY
Look how it took support of the upward sloping black trendline https://t.co/mhqkIzBkQN
#BANKNIFTY
— Nikita Poojary (@niki_poojary) February 6, 2022
\U0001d403\U0001d41a\U0001d422\U0001d425\U0001d432 \U0001d413\U0001d405: 38855 is the BO level on daily TF which was taken out on Feb 2 & if BNF sustains above 39500 level in the coming week then we can see a fresh leg of upmove
Formation of rising wedge i.e. HH & HL pattern
S/R on daily mentioned pic.twitter.com/liaqfEezkW
More from Nikita Poojary
Folks you can check his y'days video
Although, I have learnt this extended move set up from @iManasArora 🙌
Do follow him & check his timeline for such set ups!
#BANKNIFTY
— Nikita Poojary (@niki_poojary) November 30, 2021
90degree upmove qualifies for abnormality, be cautious \U0001f6a8 pic.twitter.com/uyFCMpGOuR
I shorted the ATM CE's which Subasish Pani does, and hence I mentioned strike selection inspired by Mr. Pani!
More from Banknifty
System says don't buy the dip
Wait for dip of dip of dip at 30500 #Banknifty & 15000 #Nifty
#Banknifty 33900-34100 zone has provided Support & bounce multiple times in last 12 months.
— Zafar Shaikh (@InvesysCapital) May 8, 2022
Watch this level carefully in current week. If 33900 goes, would open up big downside towards 30500 in May series ( Which is confluence of multiple support & AVWAP from Mar20 lows) pic.twitter.com/B7KUNkVVSE
You May Also Like
Imagine for a moment the most obscurantist, jargon-filled, po-mo article the politically correct academy might produce. Pure SJW nonsense. Got it? Chances are you're imagining something like the infamous "Feminist Glaciology" article from a few years back.https://t.co/NRaWNREBvR pic.twitter.com/qtSFBYY80S
— Jeffrey Sachs (@JeffreyASachs) October 13, 2018
The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.
Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)
There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.
At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?
Flat Earth conference attendees explain how they have been brainwashed by YouTube and Infowarshttps://t.co/gqZwGXPOoc
— Raw Story (@RawStory) November 18, 2018
This spring at SxSW, @SusanWojcicki promised "Wikipedia snippets" on debated videos. But they didn't put them on flat earth videos, and instead @YouTube is promoting merchandising such as "NASA lies - Never Trust a Snake". 2/
A few example of flat earth videos that were promoted by YouTube #today:
https://t.co/TumQiX2tlj 3/
https://t.co/uAORIJ5BYX 4/
https://t.co/yOGZ0pLfHG 5/