Asian Paints took a bounce exactly from the level given on 21st October.
It has string resistance at 3200, so fresh up-move will be confirmed only when it opens above 3220-3230 levels
#ASIANPAINT
#DKBPositional https://t.co/Q6fTbK5VHM
Asian Paints also at crucial support line, bulls desperately need a reversal here, else it'll go in hibernation..... pic.twitter.com/VTfaMfpHXs
— Professor (@DillikiBiili) October 21, 2021
More from Professor
More from Asianpaints
This Sector always rewarded with high Valuation by Mr. Market bcoz of must consumption business
Proxy for Housing and Infra Play
Charts attached - Price at Good Levels
@Vivek_Investor
@WealthEnrich
@caniravkaria https://t.co/ZJOxMx2J8S
Now Domestic Appliance Business
— Market Learner \U0001f3af (@MarketLearner7) June 13, 2021
A must consumption in Kitchen
Enjoying Duopoly in the business#TTK#Hawkins
Compared both players
Analyzed newly listed & Only listed Co in this business
Charts looking Great at CP @Vivek_Investor @vetris_stocks @Stockstudy8 @ca_mehtaravi https://t.co/kltgrigoml pic.twitter.com/VnbguRQd5X
You May Also Like
As a dean of a major academic institution, I could not have said this. But I will now. Requiring such statements in applications for appointments and promotions is an affront to academic freedom, and diminishes the true value of diversity, equity of inclusion by trivializing it. https://t.co/NfcI5VLODi
— Jeffrey Flier (@jflier) November 10, 2018
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".
If everyone was holding bitcoin on the old x86 in their parents basement, we would be finding a price bottom. The problem is the risk is all pooled at a few brokerages and a network of rotten exchanges with counter party risk that makes AIG circa 2008 look like a good credit.
— Greg Wester (@gwestr) November 25, 2018
The benign product is sovereign programmable money, which is historically a niche interest of folks with a relatively clustered set of beliefs about the state, the literary merit of Snow Crash, and the utility of gold to the modern economy.
This product has narrow appeal and, accordingly, is worth about as much as everything else on a 486 sitting in someone's basement is worth.
The other product is investment scams, which have approximately the best product market fit of anything produced by humans. In no age, in no country, in no city, at no level of sophistication do people consistently say "Actually I would prefer not to get money for nothing."
This product needs the exchanges like they need oxygen, because the value of it is directly tied to having payment rails to move real currency into the ecosystem and some jurisdictional and regulatory legerdemain to stay one step ahead of the banhammer.
