APOLLOPIPE
Double Top Buy triggered above 1608.64 daily close on 1% Box Size chart. https://t.co/7jxOpBHGUO
APOLLOPIPE
— Saket Reddy (@saketreddy) July 26, 2021
Double Top Buy & T20 Pattern - Bullish above 1204.85 daily close on 3% Box Size chart. pic.twitter.com/009A5IXJeP
More from Saket Reddy
The Home Building Theme has just broadened itself and is moving in top gear!
The best ways to play the real estate revival theme instead of buying the home builders :-
— Saket Reddy (@saketreddy) November 21, 2020
1. Ceramics (CERA, KAJARIA)
2. Pipes (ASTRAL, SUPREME, APLAPOLLO)
3. Paints (ASIAN, BERGER)
4. Cement (JKCEM, SHREEC)
5. Construction Chemicals (PIDILITE)
6. Electricals (POLYCAB, HAVELLS)
Double Top Buy above 2864.83 daily close on 1% Box Size chart. https://t.co/oP7KnYn7R8
HDFC
— Saket Reddy (@saketreddy) February 2, 2021
High Quality standalone business, Holds double digit stakes in High quality group companies like HDFCBANK & HDFCLIFE.
Double Top buy & ABC Pattern breakout above 2698.8 daily close on 1% box size chart & Double top buy above 2756.62 on 3% box size chart. https://t.co/6ozyrPMgIG pic.twitter.com/fXRcAI9Kws
More from Aplapollo
Apollo Pipes was highly requested company after we released Prince Pipes analysis.
Hope this matches the expectation of the community. 🙏
Another Superb Blog by @badola_arjun . This time on Apollo Pipes \U0001f3d7\ufe0f\U0001f3d7\ufe0f
— Intrinsic Compounding (@soicfinance) September 8, 2021
This completes our PVC/CPVC pipes industry analysis. Done with Astral,Prince and Apollo \U0001f600
Link to read\U0001f517: https://t.co/Ib40q9Fg3g pic.twitter.com/TlN1Urgp01
You May Also Like
This New York Times feature shows China with a Gini Index of less than 30, which would make it more equal than Canada, France, or the Netherlands. https://t.co/g3Sv6DZTDE
That's weird. Income inequality in China is legendary.
Let's check this number.
2/The New York Times cites the World Bank's recent report, "Fair Progress? Economic Mobility across Generations Around the World".
The report is available here:
3/The World Bank report has a graph in which it appears to show the same value for China's Gini - under 0.3.
The graph cites the World Development Indicators as its source for the income inequality data.
4/The World Development Indicators are available at the World Bank's website.
Here's the Gini index: https://t.co/MvylQzpX6A
It looks as if the latest estimate for China's Gini is 42.2.
That estimate is from 2012.
5/A Gini of 42.2 would put China in the same neighborhood as the U.S., whose Gini was estimated at 41 in 2013.
I can't find the <30 number anywhere. The only other estimate in the tables for China is from 2008, when it was estimated at 42.8.
He has been wrong (or lying) so often that it will be nearly impossible for me to track every grift, lie, deceit, manipulation he has pulled. I will use...
... other sources who have been trying to shine on light on this grifter (as I have tried to do, time and again:
Ivor Cummins BE (Chem) is a former R&D Manager at HP (sourcre: https://t.co/Wbf5scf7gn), turned Content Creator/Podcast Host/YouTube personality. (Call it what you will.)
— Steve (@braidedmanga) November 17, 2020
Example #1: "Still not seeing Sweden signal versus Denmark really"... There it was (Images attached).
19 to 80 is an over 300% difference.
Tweet: https://t.co/36FnYnsRT9
Example #2 - "Yes, I'm comparing the Noridcs / No, you cannot compare the Nordics."
I wonder why...
Tweets: https://t.co/XLfoX4rpck / https://t.co/vjE1ctLU5x
Example #3 - "I'm only looking at what makes the data fit in my favour" a.k.a moving the goalposts.
Tweets: https://t.co/vcDpTu3qyj / https://t.co/CA3N6hC2Lq