#APLAPOLLO
Waise
APL APOLLO ka bhi
Amitabh bachchan se koi Lena dena nahi hai.
#Influence
#Stock price
More from Waves_Perception(Dinesh Patel) Stock Market FARMER
More from Aplapollo
Three interesting players in the pipes industry have been covered on the SOIC platform! 🎉
Apollo Pipes was highly requested company after we released Prince Pipes analysis.
Hope this matches the expectation of the community. 🙏
Apollo Pipes was highly requested company after we released Prince Pipes analysis.
Hope this matches the expectation of the community. 🙏
Another Superb Blog by @badola_arjun . This time on Apollo Pipes \U0001f3d7\ufe0f\U0001f3d7\ufe0f
— Intrinsic Compounding (@soicfinance) September 8, 2021
This completes our PVC/CPVC pipes industry analysis. Done with Astral,Prince and Apollo \U0001f600
Link to read\U0001f517: https://t.co/Ib40q9Fg3g pic.twitter.com/TlN1Urgp01
You May Also Like
"I lied about my basic beliefs in order to keep a prestigious job. Now that it will be zero-cost to me, I have a few things to say."
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".
As a dean of a major academic institution, I could not have said this. But I will now. Requiring such statements in applications for appointments and promotions is an affront to academic freedom, and diminishes the true value of diversity, equity of inclusion by trivializing it. https://t.co/NfcI5VLODi
— Jeffrey Flier (@jflier) November 10, 2018
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".