கோவை திமுக ஹோட்டல் நடத்துநரின் வாட்ஸ் ஆப் பதிவின் சுருக்கம். #திருட்டு_திமுக
சாந்தி கியர்ஸ் சுப்ரமணியம் மலிவு விலை சமூக உணவகத்தை ஆரம்பித்து மற்ற ஹோட்டல்கள் உணவை விட தரமான உணவை அவர்கள் விற்கும் விலையில் மூன்றில் ஒரு பங்கு விலைக்கு கொடுக்க ஆரம்பித்தவுடன் பல ஹோட்டல்கள் அதனால்
சில நாட்களில் அந்த ஏரியா திமுக செயலர் அப்பகுதி அனைத்து ஹோட்டல்காரர்களையும் திரட்டி சுப்பிரமணியம் அவர்களை சந்திக்க அழைத்து சென்று விலையை ஏற்ற வேண்டும் என்று அவர்கள் முன்னிலையில் மிரட்டியிருக்கிறார். அசராத சுப்ரமணியம் இன்னும் விலையை
More from அன்பெழில்
More from All
You May Also Like
"I lied about my basic beliefs in order to keep a prestigious job. Now that it will be zero-cost to me, I have a few things to say."
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".
As a dean of a major academic institution, I could not have said this. But I will now. Requiring such statements in applications for appointments and promotions is an affront to academic freedom, and diminishes the true value of diversity, equity of inclusion by trivializing it. https://t.co/NfcI5VLODi
— Jeffrey Flier (@jflier) November 10, 2018
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".
