If you're trying to analyze a company without using an adequate checklist, you may make a very bad investment" - Charlie Munger

Small Thread of Investment Checklist from Masters

1. Charlie Munger's Investment Checklist

2. Warren Buffett's Investment Checklist
3. Philip Fisher's 15 points Businesses Analysis Checklist
4. Peter Lynch's Investment Checklist
5. Mohnish Pabrai's Investment Checklist
Master Accounting Quality Checklist

Source: https://t.co/rjNqzkTRwd
7. Michael Shearn's Investment Checklist

Source: https://t.co/aADVMA4fNu
8. Li-Lu's Investment Checklist
9. The QGLP Checklist from Raamdeo Agrawal
If you enjoyed this thread please retweet it so it can reach every investor

https://t.co/lhGDWMHKYF
And don't forget to follow @InvestmentBook1 if you loved the thread :)

You can subscribe to our newsletter if you want to receive such curated investing content directly into your inbox

https://t.co/6Y6z9FvYme
WB's Checklist in 1 Page

More from Investment Books (Dhaval)

More from All

ChatGPT is a phenomenal AI Tool.

But don't limit yourself to just ChatGPT.

Here're 8 AI-powered tools you should try in 2023:

1. KaiberAI

@KaiberAI helps you generate beautiful videos in minutes.

Transform your ideas into the visual stories of your dreams with this Amazing Tool.

New features:
1. Upload your custom music
2. Prompt Templates
3. Camera Movements:

Check here

https://t.co/ivnDRf628L


2. @tldview TLDV

Best ChatGPT Alternative for meetings.

Make your meetings 10X more productive with this amazing tool.

Try it now:

https://t.co/vOy3sS4QfJ


3. ComposeAI

Use ComposeAI for generating any text using AI.

It’s will help you write better content in seconds.

Try it here:

https://t.co/ksj5aop5ZI


4. Browser AI

Use this AI tool to extract and monitor data from any website.

Train a robot in 2 minutes to do your work.

No coding required.

https://t.co/nNiawtUMyO

You May Also Like

This is a pretty valiant attempt to defend the "Feminist Glaciology" article, which says conventional wisdom is wrong, and this is a solid piece of scholarship. I'll beg to differ, because I think Jeffery, here, is confusing scholarship with "saying things that seem right".


The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.


Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)


There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.


At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?