संस्कृतम् - Dead or Alive?

Came across a discussion on BVP that linked to a few leading western Indologists opining on the Sanskrit Revival movement & the spoken Sanskrit movement

https://t.co/KXFQU9exUx

Quite instructive!

The starting point - the famous chai video of Pollock (Padma Shri 2010)

Efforts to revive or ‘speak’ संस्कृतम् as exemplified by unwashed Hindoos trying to order चायपानीयम् in Sanscreet memorably filled Prof. Pollock with ‘nwosayae’ 😀 https://t.co/HMEfonAsnw
The evocatively titled Death of Sanskrit by Sheldon Pollock had crystallized the Indological view that Sanskrit is dead & its best left dead!

He also shared a horror of Hindoos, ‘Inheritors of a past that they did not create themselves’ actually daring to bring it back to life https://t.co/lnunp8639E
Now most संस्कृतम् learners will find it most perplexing !

Why should an Indologist, a lifelong Sanskritist have such a horror of संस्कृतम् springing back to life?

किमर्थं भोः?

To help संस्कृतानुरागिनः understand their PoV, an instructive thread is attached
Prof. Stella Sandahl, an Emeritus Professor at Dept. of East Asian Studies has this opening remark

‘How can we rescue Sanskrit from these vandals’?

She claims that speaking Sanskrit is correlated with demolishing temples & violating nuns!

This is a Professor & a Sanskritist!
A raft of Indian compradors & native informants support this view

For e.g an Indian ‘Professor of Sanskrit’ is echoing the pernicious nature of spoken संस्कृतम्

So, भवान् संस्कृतं जानाति किम्? may be the Hindoo revivalist equivalent of the infamous East Pakistani lungi test🤯
HH Hock, a leading Indologist, takes a more nuanced , but still negative view

Spoken सरलसंस्कृतम् is a pidgin & creates a false, manufactured sense of Identity!
George Hart, a Sanskritist & Tamizh Indologist & a Padma Shri (2015) has this to say

The trouble with spoken Sanskrit is that its dumbed down! It creates a sense of arrogance & ‘superiority’! Doesn’t make you rap like Kalidasa!
There are of course, sane views also

Heres one
Probably panicking at the thought of having stepped on a land-mine, Professor Sandahl asks plaintively

‘Why can’t we let it be, a beautiful dead language’?🤡

Apparently Panini assassinated Sanscreet!🤯
This topic is relevant given a recent tweet on ‘scholars’ & twitter folks who rubbish them

These above screenshots shows the nature of politics/views connected with Indology scholarship

Staggering hypocrisy!

No wonder hotheads on either side quickly escalate to गाल्यः।😂
And to conclude by following the sane advice ‘do they even read a line’ of what they discussed, here is what Sarala Samskritam sets out to do! https://t.co/ucYH5y5BuY
A few screenshots of the stated purpose & design of the सरलसम्स्कृतम् movement

Quite clear that it’s designed as a ‘gateway program’ & tries to be fully compliant with the Paninian framework
Coda

A whole bunch of privileged Indologists are fearful of unwashed masses learning संस्कृतम्, becoming aware & ‘horror of horrors’, ‘debating’ with them!

They fear संस्कृतम् will engender civilizational confidence

They fear a living संस्कृतम्।

पठतु संस्कृतम्। जयतु भारतम्।

More from All

How can we use language supervision to learn better visual representations for robotics?

Introducing Voltron: Language-Driven Representation Learning for Robotics!

Paper: https://t.co/gIsRPtSjKz
Models: https://t.co/NOB3cpATYG
Evaluation: https://t.co/aOzQu95J8z

🧵👇(1 / 12)


Videos of humans performing everyday tasks (Something-Something-v2, Ego4D) offer a rich and diverse resource for learning representations for robotic manipulation.

Yet, an underused part of these datasets are the rich, natural language annotations accompanying each video. (2/12)

The Voltron framework offers a simple way to use language supervision to shape representation learning, building off of prior work in representations for robotics like MVP (
https://t.co/Pb0mk9hb4i) and R3M (https://t.co/o2Fkc3fP0e).

The secret is *balance* (3/12)

Starting with a masked autoencoder over frames from these video clips, make a choice:

1) Condition on language and improve our ability to reconstruct the scene.

2) Generate language given the visual representation and improve our ability to describe what's happening. (4/12)

By trading off *conditioning* and *generation* we show that we can learn 1) better representations than prior methods, and 2) explicitly shape the balance of low and high-level features captured.

Why is the ability to shape this balance important? (5/12)

You May Also Like