Judicial System of India (Explained)
In this thread, U will understand-
1. How Indian Judiciary operates
2. How judges of SC, HC and SS r appointed
3. How they can be removed
4. Role of Law ministry
5. Judicial corruption
1/24
1. They r protector of constitution n they can go to any extent to protect constitution
2. They r the interpreter of constitution. Indian constitution is not descriptive, its one liners
Like India constitution use the word minority but doesn't define what is minority
So they interpreted in whatever way they wanted
1. District courts : Session courts, metropolitan courts, special courts. In every city
2. High court ; 1 in every state
3. Supreme court : 1 in country at New Delhi
In India Judges r not appointed by some entrance exam like IAS or IES. They r appointed straight away by a team of 5-7 Judges. That team is called collegium. This appointment procedure didn't mention in Indian constitution but was made by judges
S. P. Gupta v. Union of India - 1981 (also known as the Judges' Transfer case)
Supreme Court Advocates-on Record Association vs Union of India - 1993
In re Special Reference 1 of 1998
District Court :
there r 2 ways
high court can appoint any lawyer who have 7 year experience
or
By State judicial services exam n then interview by high-count
The SC collegium is headed by the CJI (Chief Justice of India) and comprises four other senior most judges of the court.
A HC collegium is led by its Chief Justice and four other senior most judges of that court.
-any advocate who has experience of 10 year can become high court judge
- proposal initiated by HC Collegium sent to Supreme Court collegium - law ministry - state govt - governor
Any person can become supreme court judge
- 5 year experience as judge in any HC
- 10 year experience as advocate in HC
Who will become next CJI is decided by current CJI on the basis on seniority
To Whomsoever these HC n SC judges decide they can make them Judge.
N this has become the major reason of nepotism in Indian judiciary.
Its said Judges recommends the name of only their relative family members.
Its impossible to those lawyers to get place in Indian judiciary who r not from elite melord family.
Currently there r 3 crore pending cases in India n Indian Judiciary works hardly 200 days in a year.
India Judiciary has 0 accountability that means u cant criticize them, make them legally responsible for their judgements.
In April 2017, a judicial Magistrate Debanjan Ghosh gave bail to a murder accused, and it is alleged that it is unusual unless huge money is involved.
n Dec 2009, Prashant Bhushan said, "out of the last 16 to 17 Chief Justices, half have been corrupt
Impeachment process of Judges is also so complex that its impossible to remove them.
1. Proposal is initiated by 100 Loksabha or 50 Rajya sabha MPs
2. Speakers make a inquiry committee. Who r the members of that committee ?
- Supreme court judge
- high court judge
- jurist
Till now no supreme court judge ever impeached in India.
One high court judge has been impeached for the corruption.
but in 2015, Supreme court dismissed this NJAC.
Nepotism in Indian judiciary
ref: https://t.co/Nj4hFjm57h
https://t.co/P3o7EJXoJ4
Why its impossible to become judge in India if u don't belong to elite group
Ref : https://t.co/seT61Xj3IY
A thread by @InfinityTarun
24/24
More from All
You May Also Like
The YouTube algorithm that I helped build in 2011 still recommends the flat earth theory by the *hundreds of millions*. This investigation by @RawStory shows some of the real-life consequences of this badly designed AI.
This spring at SxSW, @SusanWojcicki promised "Wikipedia snippets" on debated videos. But they didn't put them on flat earth videos, and instead @YouTube is promoting merchandising such as "NASA lies - Never Trust a Snake". 2/
A few example of flat earth videos that were promoted by YouTube #today:
https://t.co/TumQiX2tlj 3/
https://t.co/uAORIJ5BYX 4/
https://t.co/yOGZ0pLfHG 5/
Flat Earth conference attendees explain how they have been brainwashed by YouTube and Infowarshttps://t.co/gqZwGXPOoc
— Raw Story (@RawStory) November 18, 2018
This spring at SxSW, @SusanWojcicki promised "Wikipedia snippets" on debated videos. But they didn't put them on flat earth videos, and instead @YouTube is promoting merchandising such as "NASA lies - Never Trust a Snake". 2/
A few example of flat earth videos that were promoted by YouTube #today:
https://t.co/TumQiX2tlj 3/
https://t.co/uAORIJ5BYX 4/
https://t.co/yOGZ0pLfHG 5/
1/“What would need to be true for you to….X”
Why is this the most powerful question you can ask when attempting to reach an agreement with another human being or organization?
A thread, co-written by @deanmbrody:
2/ First, “X” could be lots of things. Examples: What would need to be true for you to
- “Feel it's in our best interest for me to be CMO"
- “Feel that we’re in a good place as a company”
- “Feel that we’re on the same page”
- “Feel that we both got what we wanted from this deal
3/ Normally, we aren’t that direct. Example from startup/VC land:
Founders leave VC meetings thinking that every VC will invest, but they rarely do.
Worse over, the founders don’t know what they need to do in order to be fundable.
4/ So why should you ask the magic Q?
To get clarity.
You want to know where you stand, and what it takes to get what you want in a way that also gets them what they want.
It also holds them (mentally) accountable once the thing they need becomes true.
5/ Staying in the context of soliciting investors, the question is “what would need to be true for you to want to invest (or partner with us on this journey, etc)?”
Multiple responses to this question are likely to deliver a positive result.
Why is this the most powerful question you can ask when attempting to reach an agreement with another human being or organization?
A thread, co-written by @deanmbrody:
Next level tactic when closing a sale, candidate, or investment:
— Erik Torenberg (@eriktorenberg) February 27, 2018
Ask: \u201cWhat needs to be true for you to be all in?\u201d
You'll usually get an explicit answer that you might not get otherwise. It also holds them accountable once the thing they need becomes true.
2/ First, “X” could be lots of things. Examples: What would need to be true for you to
- “Feel it's in our best interest for me to be CMO"
- “Feel that we’re in a good place as a company”
- “Feel that we’re on the same page”
- “Feel that we both got what we wanted from this deal
3/ Normally, we aren’t that direct. Example from startup/VC land:
Founders leave VC meetings thinking that every VC will invest, but they rarely do.
Worse over, the founders don’t know what they need to do in order to be fundable.
4/ So why should you ask the magic Q?
To get clarity.
You want to know where you stand, and what it takes to get what you want in a way that also gets them what they want.
It also holds them (mentally) accountable once the thing they need becomes true.
5/ Staying in the context of soliciting investors, the question is “what would need to be true for you to want to invest (or partner with us on this journey, etc)?”
Multiple responses to this question are likely to deliver a positive result.