Complete guide to land on your first job as web3 developer 🧵

1/ Learn Web3 development

Roadmap ↓

https://t.co/y0Nx9KTk1b
2/ Build projects ( DApps ) and those on Github.

Learn 🔗

https://t.co/WAxuup4rL2
3/ Participate in a hackathon

- build real life projects
- build connection with developer
- Earn Prizes

participate in web3 hackathons

https://t.co/i4SIlJbufb
4/ Network with other web developers

- Join web3 learning web3 communities
- Share your work in Public
- build your connection on Twitter

Join now web3 learning ccommunity on Twitter

https://t.co/JyyThyWHsb
4/ Learn new , Relevant skills

- learn and build different niche of projects in Web3 like NFT projects , De-fi projects , build your own DAO , and many other project.

- like people shift from truffle to hardhat

- Always learn new tech in web3. bcoz web3 is moving so fast.
5/ Refine your Resume

- fill your resume with strong projects

- like ,If you want a job in De-fi , build Defi projects

- Never mention buildspace projects in your resume or any other tutorial based projects.
7/ Start your job Hunt

https://t.co/Y0qJFjbyi0

More from All

You May Also Like

This is a pretty valiant attempt to defend the "Feminist Glaciology" article, which says conventional wisdom is wrong, and this is a solid piece of scholarship. I'll beg to differ, because I think Jeffery, here, is confusing scholarship with "saying things that seem right".


The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.


Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)


There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.


At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?